Re: Lawyers/Politicians
By: metalhead to Daryl Stout on Mon Jul 25 2016 11:42 am
I think it's obvious that a lot of money is wasted on making all these officials comfortable. But couldn't a factory worker, or a police officer attend meetings on the side, and be a full time day laborer and congressman at the same time? Only 1 job puts food on the table, and the
Since the founding, the rationale behind paying elected officials has been to ensure it isn't just the already-wealthy who have time for public service.
This is how things were in Britain, where Members of Parliament were all of
the aristocracy, because the laborers and merchants were too busy working to survive or to tend to their businesses. Aristocrats already had their lives taken care of, so they had the time to devote to public service. Unfortunately, their idea of service was maintaining their position in society. Taking care of elected officials' financial concerns is the way the US, and other modern democracies, have decided is the best way to open up governance to all.
There is another reason we pay elected officials at least a bit over the average salary. It discourages bribery. Of course, the truly greedy or power hungry will still seek corrupt avenues, but most congress people will make enough not to become so desperate financially that a corrupt lobbyist can come in with a small stack of money for this month's rent in exchange for a vote on a bill.
I don't think it's feasible to expect elected officials to need to actively maintain other jobs during their terms. If you're elected US Senator from South Dakota, how are you going to make it to the Capitol for session after you get off your office job in Pierre? For that matter, if you're elected a member of the New York Assembly, how do you make it to Albany for session every day after work at your factory in Buffalo?
Yes, we probably should discuss whether our representatives are being paid too much, but we also shouldn't cut their salaries to anything less than enough to not have to worry about finances while under term. It may not seem fair to pay members of Congress when they're not currently doing a good job, but the alternative is having only the rich in Congress and the White House. They're the only ones who could afford to take 2-6 years off minimum to serve in Washington.
-J
---
þ Synchronet þ Basement Theory BBS þ basement.synchro.net