• Fake moon landings, not.

    From cybergod@VERT to Hylian on Mon Oct 31 03:48:00 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Hylian to Mro on Sat Jun 20 2015 07:14 am

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Mro to Hylian on Fri Jun 19 2015 10:23 pm

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Hylian to Mro on Thu Jun 18 2015 10:43 pm

    people could record videos and do tricks with photos back then. shooting people into space and getting them on the moon and back in jus seems doubtful to me.
    Seriously, didn't you see my original post about this?

    Faking the moon landing was not possible in 1969. The technology did n exist.

    sure it did.
    We did and do have the technology right now to land on the moon.
    Don't confuse lack of will with lack of ability.
    We also shoot lasers at reflective materials we put on the moon. It's we know the moon is slowly drifting further away from the earth.

    i just dont think that in 1969 we had a flawless mission where we brought humans to the moon, had them walk around and brought them back alive.

    You say we did have the technology to create this hoax, but you give zero percent proof of your claim, while I posted a video with my first post that a veteran of filmography that was shooting video back then give evidence to contrary.

    So I know he is right, and I know you are not. Just saying "sure it did" doe not sprinle magic fairy dust on this pretend moon hoax to make it real.

    Mean while his thoughtful, meticulous and fact checked statements give him t credence. In other words, he came at it with cold hard undeniable fact.

    You came at it with "sure it did."

    Sorry, humans went to and came back to earth alive in 1969.

    No point in talking about this anymore. You couldn't sway my mind now with a mack truck.

    -Denny
    Denny's Computers - "Not profit seeking" PC Repair - http://dpccom.blogspot.



    now you just made a statement with no proof! "I know a vetran photographer" prove it, prove he is a vetran and furthermore, prove that he is qualified to judge wether or not a hoax could be made believable with 1960's tech.

    by the way anyone who thinks we never landed on the moon is a morron, we braught back rocks from the moon that are rich with helium 3, helium 3 only exists on the moon, there is none on earth. fit that into your conspiracy calculations, i cant wait to see what lunacy everyone comes up with.

    you all talk like you are an authority on the subject, you are all an authority on nothing. none of you have any proof and none of you know what you are talking about..


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Welcome to METALLIC DREAMS!! - bbs.metallic-dreams.com
  • From echicken@VERT to cybergod on Tue Nov 1 09:00:20 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to Hylian on Mon Oct 31 2016 03:48:00

    now you just made a statement with no proof! "I know a vetran photographer" prove it, prove he is a vetran and furthermore, prove that he is qualified to judge wether or not a hoax could be made believable with 1960's tech.

    He provided a link to a video in an earlier post; the name of the filmmaker in question is available there. You can look up the "veteran photographer" and make your own judgements about whether or not they are qualified.

    by the way anyone who thinks we never landed on the moon is a morron, we

    I'm pretty sure the guy you're raging at here actually agrees with you on this point. You seem to have difficulty with reading comprehension and following discussion threads; not a great combo for someone who wants to debate stuff online.

    conspiracy calculations, i cant wait to see what lunacy everyone comes up

    Heh, "lunacy".

    you all talk like you are an authority on the subject, you are all an authority on nothing. none of you have any proof and none of you know what you are talking about..

    Prove that they're not! Prove that you're qualified to pass judgement on their qualifications! PROVE IT! PROVE IT!

    ---
    echicken
    electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com - 416-273-7230
    þ Synchronet þ electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com
  • From Mro@VERT to cybergod on Wed Nov 2 22:48:04 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to Hylian on Mon Oct 31 2016 03:48 am

    you all talk like you are an authority on the subject, you are all an authority on nothing. none of you have any proof and none of you know what you are talking about..


    i am an authority on this subject and i damn your respect and obediance.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From cybergod@VERT to echicken on Mon Nov 14 01:16:00 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: echicken to cybergod on Tue Nov 01 2016 10:00 am

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to Hylian on Mon Oct 31 2016 03:48:00

    now you just made a statement with no proof! "I know a vetran photographer" prove it, prove he is a vetran and furthermore, prove tha he is qualified to judge wether or not a hoax could be made believable with 1960's tech.

    He provided a link to a video in an earlier post; the name of the filmmaker question is available there. You can look up the "veteran photographer" and make your own judgements about whether or not they are qualified.

    by the way anyone who thinks we never landed on the moon is a morron, w

    I'm pretty sure the guy you're raging at here actually agrees with you on th point. You seem to have difficulty with reading comprehension and following discussion threads; not a great combo for someone who wants to debate stuff online.

    conspiracy calculations, i cant wait to see what lunacy everyone comes

    Heh, "lunacy".

    you all talk like you are an authority on the subject, you are all an authority on nothing. none of you have any proof and none of you know w you are talking about..

    Prove that they're not! Prove that you're qualified to pass judgement on the qualifications! PROVE IT! PROVE IT!


    im not even sure why im responding to you since you obviously have reading comprehension issues, you seem to miss the psrts of the message i am replying about, butno matter, you want to know my qualifications, well i was not going to say this since the morrons will say im full of shit, but i worked for N.A.S.A. though the united space alliance as an engineer with a TS SCI (top secret) clearance and i can only assure you we have been to the moon, now that i have said that, i amm done with this converation, i really dont care what you think, i know the truth and if you think we have done anything other then go to the moon (or anyone else) you are all fools, you can all go back to your magic world of conspiracies and evil government plans to decieve the world to believe we never went to the moon for reasons only you are aware of... bye bye now!!


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Welcome to METALLIC DREAMS!! - bbs.metallic-dreams.com
  • From echicken@VERT to cybergod on Mon Nov 14 10:18:29 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to echicken on Mon Nov 14 2016 01:16:00

    im not even sure why im responding to you since you obviously have reading comprehension issues, you seem to miss the psrts of the message i am

    I parsed your garbled message just fine, and kept in mind who you were replying to and what they had previously said.

    With the exception of one point (clearly a sore point for you) you have ignored everything that I said.

    replying about, butno matter, you want to know my qualifications, well i

    No, I don't want to know your qualifications. I don't care. I was mocking your own insistence that someone else back up a citation with proof of some third party's qualifications. They had already given you enough to go on.

    i worked for N.A.S.A. though the united space alliance as an engineer with a TS SCI (top secret) clearance and i can only assure you we have been to

    If you say so. No offense, but you don't give off the air of an intelligent or learned individual, so this is hard to accept as truth.

    the moon, now that i have said that, i amm done with this converation, i really dont care what you think, i know the truth and if you think we have done anything other then go to the moon (or anyone else) you are all

    I didn't say what I believed on this subject one way or the other. Reading comprehension, son. The purpose of my original message was to point out that you were arguing with a guy who seemed to be in agreement with you.

    For what it's worth - and to the extent that I even give enough of a fuck to form an opinion - I believe that the moon landings happened. IMHO it'd be simpler to get to the moon than to get away with fakery for so long. Occam's razor, and so forth.

    for reasons only you are aware of... bye bye now!!

    Dropping the mic works better when you've delivered a solid, final message. Nice one, though. Bye bye!

    ---
    echicken
    electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.c
  • From cybergod@VERT to Mro on Mon Nov 14 01:20:00 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Mro to cybergod on Wed Nov 02 2016 11:48 pm

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to Hylian on Mon Oct 31 2016 03:48 am

    you all talk like you are an authority on the subject, you are all an authority on nothing. none of you have any proof and none of you know wha you are talking about..


    i am an authority on this subject and i damn your respect and obediance.


    what ever you say dude....


    ---
    þ Synchron
  • From Mro@VERT to cybergod on Wed Nov 16 18:22:53 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to Mro on Mon Nov 14 2016 01:20 am

    i am an authority on this subject and i damn your respect and obediance.


    what ever you say dude....


    *demand
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - fre
  • From cybergod@VERT to echicken on Sat Nov 19 04:00:00 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: echicken to cybergod on Mon Nov 14 2016 10:18 am

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to echicken on Mon Nov 14 2016 01:16:00

    im not even sure why im responding to you since you obviously have read comprehension issues, you seem to miss the psrts of the message i am

    I parsed your garbled message just fine, and kept in mind who you were reply to and what they had previously said.

    With the exception of one point (clearly a sore point for you) you have igno everything that I said.

    replying about, butno matter, you want to know my qualifications, well

    No, I don't want to know your qualifications. I don't care. I was mocking your own insistence that someone else back up a citation with proof of some third party's qualifications. They had already given you enough to go on.

    i worked for N.A.S.A. though the united space alliance as an engineer w a TS SCI (top secret) clearance and i can only assure you we have been

    If you say so. No offense, but you don't give off the air of an intelligent learned individual, so this is hard to accept as truth.

    the moon, now that i have said that, i amm done with this converation, really dont care what you think, i know the truth and if you think we h done anything other then go to the moon (or anyone else) you are all

    I didn't say what I believed on this subject one way or the other. Reading comprehension, son. The purpose of my original message was to point out tha you were arguing with a guy who seemed to be in agreement with you.

    For what it's worth - and to the extent that I even give enough of a fuck to form an opinion - I believe that the moon landings happened. IMHO it'd be simpler to get to the moon than to get away with fakery for so long. Occam's razor, and so forth.

    for reasons only you are aware of... bye bye now!!

    Dropping the mic works better when you've delivered a solid, final message. Nice one, though. Bye bye!


    im just gonna say this and then i am not going to continue this STUPID conversation with and uneducated person... there is a TON of PHYSICAL evidence that we landed on the moon, and nothing to disprove it except your word... end of conversation!!


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Welcome to METALLIC DREAMS!! - bbs.metallic-dreams.com
  • From echicken@VERT to cybergod on Sun Nov 20 02:10:18 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to echicken on Sat Nov 19 2016 04:00:00

    im just gonna say this and then i am not going to continue this STUPID conversation with and uneducated person... there is a TON of PHYSICAL

    I'd take your opinion of me more seriously if there were the slightest indication that you'd read what I had written. This is like a blind person telling me how ugly I look; somewhat perplexing, but not so hurtful.

    evidence that we landed on the moon, and nothing to disprove it except your word... end of conversation!!

    Look ... I don't know what to tell you at this point. I literally just agreed with you (that the moon landing(s) actually happened). You missed my point entirely. No matter; this is the second time you've quit this conversation, and I'll still be here to make fun of you if/when you return. For now I'm just gonna say this: NASA or not, you're a fucking moron.

    your word... end of conversation!!

    No it isn't. See? I just continued it!

    The moon landings were an inside job! Investigate Apollo/11! loldongs!

    ---
    echicken
    electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com - 416-273-7230
    þ Synchronet þ electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com
  • From Tim Smith@VERT to cybergod on Sun Nov 20 05:43:13 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to echicken on Sat Nov 19 2016 04:00 am

    im just gonna say this and then i am not going to continue this STUPID conversation with and uneducated person... there is a TON of PHYSICAL evidence that we landed on the moon, and nothing to disprove it except your word... end of conversation!!

    I cannot believe this fucking stupid moonlanding bitchfest is still going on.. Supertroll got fed and most of had enough leftovers to share with others.
    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA
  • From Tim Smith@VERT to echicken on Sun Nov 20 05:55:45 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: echicken to cybergod on Sun Nov 20 2016 02:10 am

    No it isn't. See? I just continued it!

    The moon landings were an inside job! Investigate Apollo/11! loldongs!


    Come on man... MRO started this shit.. and you just keep trolling it on.. I bet he's at home masturbating to this..
    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA
  • From Tim Smith@VERT to echicken on Sun Nov 20 05:58:53 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Tim Smith to echicken on Sun Nov 20 2016 05:55 am

    The moon landings were an inside job! Investigate Apollo/11!
    loldongs!


    Come on man... MRO started this shit.. and you just keep trolling it on.. I bet he's at home masturbating to this..


    and... I thought you were much cooler than to stoop to his level..
    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA
  • From Mro@VERT to Tim Smith on Sun Nov 20 08:56:51 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Tim Smith to cybergod on Sun Nov 20 2016 05:43 am

    im just gonna say this and then i am not going to continue this STUPID conversation with and uneducated person... there is a TON of PHYSICAL evidence that we landed on the moon, and nothing to disprove it except your word... end of conversation!!

    I cannot believe this fucking stupid moonlanding bitchfest is still going on.. Supertroll got fed and most of had enough leftovers to share with others.


    no way did they make it there, take the pictures and make it back alive. technology wasnt even that good back then. it was 1969
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From echicken@VERT to Tim Smith on Sun Nov 20 15:06:34 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Tim Smith to echicken on Sun Nov 20 2016 05:58:53

    Come on man... MRO started this shit.. and you just keep trolling it
    on.. I bet he's at home masturbating to this..

    I can't poke fun at the subject matter? It's a silly conversation, and I was just stepping in to try to help a guy who had clearly gotten confused.

    and... I thought you were much cooler than to stoop to his level..

    I guess I'm not. Sorry to disappoint. I forgot that this moon landing stuff was serious business.

    ---
    echicken
    electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com - 416-273-7230
    þ Synchronet þ electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com
  • From Meh@VERT to Tim Smith on Sun Nov 20 14:34:52 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Tim Smith to cybergod on Sun Nov 20 2016 05:43 am

    I cannot believe this fucking stupid moonlanding bitchfest is still going on Supertroll got fed and most of had enough leftovers to share with others.

    Some people just can't let crap go. IGNORE the cretin :-)
    He probably believes 9/11 was a conspiracy also.
    Ralph Smole,Sysop.
    The Nimbus BBS
    Briar,TX

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Nimbus BBS - nimbus.synchro.net
  • From Meh@VERT to Tim Smith on Sun Nov 20 14:36:09 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Tim Smith to echicken on Sun Nov 20 2016 05:55 am

    Come on man... MRO started this shit.. and you just keep trolling it on.. I he's at home masturbating to this..

    BWAHAHAHAHA :-) With pictures of Oprah and Rosie O'Donnell.
    Ralph Smole,Sysop.
    The Nimbus BBS
    Briar,TX

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Nimbus BBS - nimbus.synchro.net
  • From Digital Man@VERT to Meh on Sun Nov 20 14:02:16 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Meh to Tim Smith on Sun Nov 20 2016 02:34 pm

    He probably believes 9/11 was a conspiracy also.

    What's funny about statement: 9/11 was clearly a conspiracy. The generally accepted narrative is that the 4 plane-attacks were all coordinated, which required the parcipitants to "conspire". It would have been an amazing coincidence if 19 those jiadhists just happened to take the same planes (and different planes) with the idea to hijack them and crash them into the towers, the pentagon and the U.S. capital/White House all on the same day. Without a doubt, 9/11 was a conspiracy.

    I'm pretty sure you're referring to the alternative conspiracy theories (e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9%2F11_conspiracy_theories), so I got your meaning.

    digital man

    Synchronet/BBS Terminology Definition #33:
    LF = Line Feed (ASCII 10, Ctrl-J)
    Norco, CA WX: 63.5øF, 71.0% humidity, 11 mph ESE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs ---

  • From Tim Smith@VERT to echicken on Sun Nov 20 19:14:55 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: echicken to Tim Smith on Sun Nov 20 2016 03:06 pm

    and... I thought you were much cooler than to stoop to his level..

    I guess I'm not. Sorry to disappoint. I forgot that this moon landing stuff was serious business.

    I really could care less about the moon "theory" its all the douchebaggery that goes with it... not coming from you per say.. and since I have that "one" on the twitlist I shall leave him nameless.. hell we had even had nice decent conversations before, until I told him his theory was stupid.. then all hell broke loose and I turned into a opioid addicted, parent killing, sysop ripping off drug dealer... lol.. but any electronic chicken who writes cool javascripts is ok in my book.
    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA
  • From Tim Smith@VERT to Meh on Sun Nov 20 19:27:46 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Meh to Tim Smith on Sun Nov 20 2016 02:34 pm

    Some people just can't let crap go. IGNORE the cretin :-)
    He probably believes 9/11 was a conspiracy also.

    Hehe.. I believe 9/11 was a conspiracy, or more of a false flag event to garner support for an unpopular war.. I wanna know when thermite just started randomly creating itself on support structures.. thats something I've just never heard of before.. oh.. the fire got so hot it produced it.. thats it..

    Yes, buldings hit the towers.. No they alone did'nt take them down..

    sorry if I get a shit storm rolling here, but thats just the truth.. a nation who is in fear is a nation that submits to every politicians wet dreams..
    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA
  • From Nightfox@VERT to Tim Smith on Sun Nov 20 19:16:28 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Tim Smith to Meh on Sun Nov 20 2016 19:27:46

    Hehe.. I believe 9/11 was a conspiracy, or more of a false flag event to garner support for an unpopular war.. I wanna know when thermite just started randomly creating itself on support structures.. thats something I've just never heard of before.. oh.. the fire got so hot it produced it.. thats it..

    Yes, buldings hit the towers.. No they alone did'nt take them down..

    sorry if I get a shit storm rolling here, but thats just the truth.. a nation who is in fear is a nation that submits to every politicians wet dreams.. --

    I thought it was a little odd when a cashier at an auto parts store years ago (around 2004-2005) gave me a copy of a DVD which had someone explaining a 9/11 conspiracy theory talking about how the airplanes might not have been passenger airplanes, etc.. I thought it was all weird, since clearly the passengers all had to have died, right? Surely all of their familes couldn't have made that up. I suppose it might be possible that there is a coverup, but then Osama Bin Laden himself claimed responsibility for the 9/11 attacks. What more proof does there need to be that there is no US government coverup? Maybe Osama Bin Laden was just taking credit for someone else's work though, perhaps?

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Mro@VERT to Meh on Sun Nov 20 22:34:24 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Meh to Tim Smith on Sun Nov 20 2016 02:34 pm

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Tim Smith to cybergod on Sun Nov 20 2016 05:43 am

    I cannot believe this fucking stupid moonlanding bitchfest is still
    going on Supertroll got fed and most of had enough leftovers to share with others.

    Some people just can't let crap go. IGNORE the cretin :-)
    He probably believes 9/11 was a conspiracy also.


    who are we talking about at this point?

    if you are talking about me, i think the sept 11th attacks were certainly a buildup of certain circumstances and decisions, and the us goverment was partially at fault, atleast in negligence.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS serv
  • From Mro@VERT to Meh on Sun Nov 20 22:34:53 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Meh to Tim Smith on Sun Nov 20 2016 02:36 pm

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Tim Smith to echicken on Sun Nov 20 2016 05:55 am

    Come on man... MRO started this shit.. and you just keep trolling it
    on.. I he's at home masturbating to this..

    BWAHAHAHAHA :-) With pictures of Oprah and Rosie O'Donnell.
    Ralph Smole,Sysop.


    you faggots need to stop thinking about me naked touching myself.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - fre
  • From Mro@VERT to Tim Smith on Sun Nov 20 22:40:15 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Tim Smith to Meh on Sun Nov 20 2016 07:27 pm

    garner support for an unpopular war.. I wanna know when thermite just started randomly creating itself on support structures.. thats something I've just never heard of before.. oh.. the fire got so hot it produced it..


    i dont recall hearing magnesium and iron filings being lit up to take down the towers.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Mro@VERT to Nightfox on Sun Nov 20 22:41:11 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Nightfox to Tim Smith on Sun Nov 20 2016 07:16 pm

    coverup, but then Osama Bin Laden himself claimed responsibility for the 9/11 attacks. What more proof does there need to be that there is no US government coverup? Maybe Osama Bin Laden was just taking credit for someone else's work though, perhaps?


    and what about that building 7 shit?
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Neozeed@VERT to Mro on Mon Nov 21 02:41:42 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Mro to Nightfox on Sun Nov 20 2016 10:41 pm

    and what about that building 7 shit?

    WTC 7 won't go away......
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ telnet://vert.synchro.net
  • From Tim Smith@VERT/KK4QBN to Nightfox on Mon Nov 21 05:55:43 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Nightfox to Tim Smith on Sun Nov 20 2016 07:16 pm

    I thought it was a little odd when a cashier at an auto parts store years ago (around 2004-2005) gave me a copy of a DVD which had someone explaining a 9/11 conspiracy theory talking about how the airplanes might not have been passenger airplanes, etc.. I thought it was all weird, since clearly the passengers all had to have died, right? Surely all of their familes couldn't have made that up. I suppose it might be possible that there is a coverup, but then Osama Bin Laden himself claimed responsibility for the 9/11 attacks. What more proof does there need to be that there is no US government coverup? Maybe Osama Bin Laden was just taking credit for someone else's work though, perhaps?

    I said (buildings hit towers) but YES the PLANES hit the towers, and YES they were full of innocent people, but NO, it it was'nt JUST the planes that took the towers down, and do you REALLY think someone who just took lessons on a CESSNA can fly a 747 pinpoint into a tower? those planes were remotely controlled, or autononymous, and the towers were a textbook controlled demolition. Osama can take credit for it all day long, after all, WE created that monster anyway.. can you not understand that the US government is the worst enemy of the US people.
    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA
  • From Deavmi@VERT/KK4QBN to Tim Smith on Mon Nov 21 08:51:02 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Nightfox to Tim Smith on Sun Nov 20 2016 07:16 pm

    I thought it was a little odd when a cashier at an auto parts store years ago (around 2004-2005) gave me a copy of a DVD which had someone explaining a 9/11 conspiracy theory talking about how the airplanes might not have been passenger airplanes, etc.. I thought it was all weird, since
    clearly the passengers all had to have died, right? Surely all of their familes couldn't have made that up. I suppose it might be possible that there is a coverup, but then Osama Bin Laden himself claimed responsibility for the 9/11 attacks. What more proof does there need to be
    that there is no US government coverup? Maybe Osama Bin Laden was just taking credit for someone else's work though, perhaps?

    I said (buildings hit towers) but YES the PLANES hit the towers, and YES they >were full of innocent people, but NO, it it was'nt JUST the planes that took >the towers down, and do you REALLY think someone who just took lessons on a >CESSNA can fly a 747 pinpoint into a tower? those planes were remotely >controlled, or autononymous, and the towers were a textbook controlled >demolition. Osama can take credit for it all day long, after all, WE created >that monster anyway.. can you not understand that the US government is the >worst enemy of the US people.
    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)


    To be honest I think anyone can fly a plane into a building, hence I think the terrorists did do it. If a plane is already in the air I do not think it would be hard to do what Osama and his peices of shit did.

    Even if you disagree we can all aggree it was terrible what happened. The lives that were lost.

    ==========

    Regards,
    Tristan B. Kildaire (Deavmi)

    Email: deavmi@ewbbs.synchro.net; deavmi@kk4qbn.synchro.net

    ==========

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA
  • From Deavmi@VERT/KK4QBN to Tim Smith on Mon Nov 21 08:51:26 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Nightfox to Tim Smith on Sun Nov 20 2016 07:16 pm

    I thought it was a little odd when a cashier at an auto parts store years ago (around 2004-2005) gave me a copy of a DVD which had someone explaining a 9/11 conspiracy theory talking about how the airplanes might not have been passenger airplanes, etc.. I thought it was all weird, since
    clearly the passengers all had to have died, right? Surely all of their familes couldn't have made that up. I suppose it might be possible that there is a coverup, but then Osama Bin Laden himself claimed responsibility for the 9/11 attacks. What more proof does there need to be
    that there is no US government coverup? Maybe Osama Bin Laden was just taking credit for someone else's work though, perhaps?

    I said (buildings hit towers) but YES the PLANES hit the towers, and YES they >were full of innocent people, but NO, it it was'nt JUST the planes that took >the towers down, and do you REALLY think someone who just took lessons on a >CESSNA can fly a 747 pinpoint into a tower? those planes were remotely >controlled, or autononymous, and the towers were a textbook controlled >demolition. Osama can take credit for it all day long, after all, WE created >that monster anyway.. can you not understand that the US government is the >worst enemy of the US people.
    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)


    Also, moon landings were real.

    ==========

    Regards,
    Tristan B. Kildaire (Deavmi)

    Email: deavmi@ewbbs.synchro.net; deavmi@kk4qbn.synchro.net

    ==========

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA
  • From Meh@VERT/NIMBUS to Mro on Mon Nov 21 14:33:29 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Mro to Meh on Sun Nov 20 2016 10:34 pm

    who are we talking about at this point?
    The "no moon" guy.
    Ralph Smole,Sysop.
    The Nimbus BBS
    Briar,TX

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Nimbus BBS - nimbus.synchro.net
  • From Meh@VERT/NIMBUS to Mro on Mon Nov 21 14:34:09 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Mro to Meh on Sun Nov 20 2016 10:34 pm

    you faggots need to stop thinking about me naked touching myself.
    Just messin' with ya man.
    Ralph Smole,Sysop.
    The Nimbus BBS
    Briar,TX

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Nimbus B
  • From Digital Man@VERT to Neozeed on Mon Nov 21 13:35:10 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Neozeed to Mro on Mon Nov 21 2016 02:41 am

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Mro to Nightfox on Sun Nov 20 2016 10:41 pm

    and what about that building 7 shit?

    WTC 7 won't go away......

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00VD_xw_5Xc

    digital man

    Synchronet/BBS Terminology Definition #14:
    DOCSIS = Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification
    Norco, CA WX: 63.2øF, 68.0% humidity, 12 mph E wind, 0.45 inches rain/24hrs
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ telnet://vert.synchro.net
  • From Tim Smith@VERT/KK4QBN to Deavmi on Mon Nov 21 11:27:04 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Deavmi to Tim Smith on Mon Nov 21 2016 08:51 am

    Also, moon landings were real.


    Of course they are. :) lol..
    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.n
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Tim Smith on Mon Nov 21 15:31:40 2016
    Also, moon landings were real.

    Of course they are. :) lol..

    I guess you can't prove they really happened because you personally weren't there, right? ;) Just like all of history, how do I know anything happened before I was born? Since I wasn't there, I don't know that it happened. ;)

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Tim Smith@VERT/KK4QBN to Nightfox on Mon Nov 21 19:14:59 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Nightfox to Tim Smith on Mon Nov 21 2016 03:31 pm

    I guess you can't prove they really happened because you personally weren't there, right? ;) Just like all of history, how do I know anything happened before I was born? Since I wasn't there, I don't know that it happened. ;)

    Well, for one, the Lunar Laser Ranging experiment.. bounce a laser off a mirror they FLEW TO THE MOON AND INSTALLED, and it bounces back, and you can do all sorts of neat things like tell how far away it is an everything.. geeze..


    I guess they got superman to fly the mirror to the moon and put it up for us..


    How long is this STUPID ASS THREAD going to last.
    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)

    ---
    þ Synchronet
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Tim Smith on Mon Nov 21 17:14:36 2016
    I guess you can't prove they really happened because you personally
    weren't there, right? ;) Just like all of history, how do I know
    anything happened before I was born? Since I wasn't there, I don't
    know that it happened. ;)

    Well, for one, the Lunar Laser Ranging experiment.. bounce a laser off a mirror they FLEW TO THE MOON AND INSTALLED, and it bounces back, and you can do all sorts of neat things like tell how far away it is an everything.. geeze..


    I guess they got superman to fly the mirror to the moon and put it up for us..


    How long is this STUPID ASS THREAD going to last.

    I was being sarcastic.. I don't believe the moon landings were fake.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ S
  • From Mro@VERT/BBSESINF to Tim Smith on Mon Nov 21 21:49:34 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Tim Smith to Nightfox on Mon Nov 21 2016 05:55 am

    remotely controlled, or autononymous, and the towers were a textbook controlled demolition. Osama can take credit for it all day long, after


    a controlled demolition would have it destroyed all the way to the ground with no damage to other buildings. this just wasnt so.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Mro@VERT/BBSESINF to Deavmi on Mon Nov 21 21:50:06 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Deavmi to Tim Smith on Mon Nov 21 2016 08:51 am

    To be honest I think anyone can fly a plane into a building, hence I think the terrorists did do it. If a plane is already in the air I do not think
    it would be hard to do what Osama and his peices of shit did.



    isnt the hard part landing? they had flying lessons so i think they had enough. ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Mro@VERT/BBSESINF to Deavmi on Mon Nov 21 21:50:30 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Deavmi to Tim Smith on Mon Nov 21 2016 08:51 am

    Also, moon landings were real.

    ==========

    Regards,
    Tristan B. Kildaire (Deavmi)


    real fake!
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS
  • From Mro@VERT/BBSESINF to Meh on Mon Nov 21 21:52:27 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Meh to Mro on Mon Nov 21 2016 02:33 pm

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Mro to Meh on Sun Nov 20 2016 10:34 pm

    who are we talking about at this point?
    The "no moon" guy.


    who is that
    -
  • From Mro@VERT/BBSESINF to Meh on Mon Nov 21 21:52:42 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Meh to Mro on Mon Nov 21 2016 02:34 pm

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Mro to Meh on Sun Nov 20 2016 10:34 pm

    you faggots need to stop thinking about me naked touching myself.
    Just messin' with ya man.



    i'm naked now eating pizza
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Mro@VERT/BBSESINF to Nightfox on Mon Nov 21 21:54:07 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Nightfox to Tim Smith on Mon Nov 21 2016 03:31 pm

    Also, moon landings were real.

    Of course they are. :) lol..

    I guess you can't prove they really happened because you personally weren't there, right? ;) Just like all of history, how do I know anything
    happened before I was born? Since I wasn't there, I don't know that it happened. ;)

    Nightfox


    bullshit baffles brains
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS
  • From Mro@VERT/BBSESINF to Tim Smith on Mon Nov 21 21:54:59 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Tim Smith to Nightfox on Mon Nov 21 2016 07:14 pm

    Well, for one, the Lunar Laser Ranging experiment.. bounce a laser off a mirror they FLEW TO THE MOON AND INSTALLED, and it bounces back, and you
    can do all sorts of neat things like tell how far away it is an
    everything.. geeze..


    how do you know they didnt install it later when we had better technology.

    How long is this STUPID ASS THREAD going to last.


    longer than your bbs usually stays up.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Mro@VERT/BBSESINF to Nightfox on Mon Nov 21 21:55:22 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Nightfox to Tim Smith on Mon Nov 21 2016 05:14 pm


    How long is this STUPID ASS THREAD going to last.

    I was being sarcastic.. I don't believe the moon landings were fake.


    dont believe everything you are force fed.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Tim Smith@VERT/KK4QBN to Nightfox on Tue Nov 22 02:26:53 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Nightfox to Tim Smith on Mon Nov 21 2016 05:14 pm

    How long is this STUPID ASS THREAD going to last.

    I was being sarcastic.. I don't believe the moon landings were fake.

    Damn.. I would hoe not.. lol.. not that it's any skin off my back.. but.. well you know.. stupidity ticks me off.. ignorance I deal with.. because I am ignorant to MANY MANY MANY subjects, until I learn that subject. stupidity is being ignorant to the subject but being too stubborn, or egotisical to admit it.
    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA US
  • From Knightmare@VERT/P99BBS to Mro on Tue Nov 22 08:27:01 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Mro to Meh on Sun Nov 20 2016 10:34 pm

    you faggots need to stop thinking about me naked touching myself.


    Really Rob/DM, this has gone far enough without THIS garbage now being spewed on the network.

  • From Knightmare@VERT/P99BBS to Neozeed on Tue Nov 22 08:28:34 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Neozeed to Mro on Mon Nov 21 2016 02:41 am

    WTC 7 won't go away......

    No Agenda?

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Precinct 99 BBS -- p99bbs.homenet.org - Lewis Center, OH USA
  • From Gryphon@VERT/CYBERIA to Mro on Tue Nov 22 08:19:00 2016
    On 11/21/16, Mro said the following...

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Nightfox to Tim Smith on Mon Nov 21 2016 05:14 pm


    How long is this STUPID ASS THREAD going to last.

    I was being sarcastic.. I don't believe the moon landings were fake.


    dont believe everything you are force fed.

    Where as it makes more sense to believe just any old conspiracy theory?

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A31 (Raspberry Pi)
    * Origin: Cyberia BBS
  • From Tim Smith@VERT/KK4QBN to Knightmare on Tue Nov 22 11:00:18 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Knightmare to Neozeed on Tue Nov 22 2016 08:28 am

    WTC 7 won't go away......

    No Agenda?

    It went away when the owner gave the go ahead to destroy it..

    it was all very good for him since he recently took out a new insurance policy on the whole lot.
    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA US
  • From Digital Man@VERT to Knightmare on Tue Nov 22 13:52:48 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Knightmare to Mro on Tue Nov 22 2016 08:27 am

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Mro to Meh on Sun Nov 20 2016 10:34 pm

    you faggots need to stop thinking about me naked touching myself.


    Really Rob/DM, this has gone far enough without THIS garbage now being spewed on the network.

    As a sysop, you have the power to filter/twitlist anyone you like. You don't need me to do anything about it.

    digital man

    Synchronet/BBS Terminology Definition #15:
    DOS = Disk Operating System (as in PC-DOS and MS-DOS)
    Norco, CA WX: 65.6øF, 53.0% humidity, 0 mph NE wind, 0.01 inches rain/24hrs
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ t
  • From Mro@VERT/BBSESINF to Tim Smith on Tue Nov 22 22:39:38 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Tim Smith to Nightfox on Tue Nov 22 2016 02:26 am

    am ignorant to MANY MANY MANY subjects, until I learn that subject. stupidity is being ignorant to the subject but being too stubborn, or egotisical to admit it.


    yeah but if you're a person with a high IQ who has their shit together and isnt a drug addict and they can back it up, that makes the loser accuser the stupid one.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Mro@VERT/BBSESINF to Knightmare on Tue Nov 22 22:41:12 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Knightmare to Mro on Tue Nov 22 2016 08:27 am

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Mro to Meh on Sun Nov 20 2016 10:34 pm

    you faggots need to stop thinking about me naked touching myself.


    Really Rob/DM, this has gone far enough without THIS garbage now being spewed on the network.


    AND NOW I'M NAKED AND EATING HONEY NUT CHERRIOS.

    GO TO YOUR SAFE PLACE, 'NIGHTMARE'

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Chris@VERT/DMINE to echicken on Wed Nov 23 22:37:25 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: echicken to Tim Smith on Sun Nov 20 2016 03:06 pm

    and... I thought you were much cooler than to stoop to his level..

    I guess I'm not. Sorry to disappoint. I forgot that this moon landing stuf was serious business.

    Wait...There was a moon landing?
    Why the hell am I always the last to know about these things?!

    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    CDP
    The Diamond Mine BBS - telnet://bbs.dmine.net
    The Retro Room - http://forums.delphiforums.com/retroroom ------------------------------------------------------------------

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Diamond Mine Online - bbs.dmine.net - Fredericksburg, VA USA
  • From mark firestone@VERT/QBBS to DEAVMI on Thu Nov 24 14:27:00 2016
    --- DEAVMI wrote --

    I said (buildings hit towers) but YES the PLANES hit the towers, and YES >were full of innocent people, but NO, it it was'nt JUST the planes that t >the towers down, and do you REALLY think someone who just took lessons on >CESSNA can fly a 747 pinpoint into a tower? those planes were remotel >controlled, or autononymous, and the towers were a textbook controlle >demolition. Osama can take credit for it all day long, after all, WE crea >that monster anyway.. can you not understand that the US government is th >worst enemy of the US people

    Also, moon landings were real

    Neil Armstrong knocked down the twin towers?


    ---
    * TARDIS BBS - Home of QUARKware * telnet bbs.cortex-media.info
  • From mark firestone@VERT/QBBS to MRO on Thu Nov 24 14:30:00 2016
    --- MRO wrote --

    real fake
    --

    The twin towers faked the mooon landings!


    ---
    * TARDIS BBS - Home of QUARKware * telnet bbs.cortex-media.info
  • From Poindexter Fortran@VERT/REALITY to mark firestone on Thu Nov 24 10:10:14 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: mark firestone to DEAVMI on Thu Nov 24 2016 02:27 pm

    Neil Armstrong knocked down the twin towers?

    I've been away too long.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ realitycheckBBS -- http://realitycheckBBS.org
  • From Knightmare@VERT/P99BBS to Tim Smith on Fri Nov 25 02:34:15 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Tim Smith to Knightmare on Tue Nov 22 2016 11:00 am

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Knightmare to Neozeed on Tue Nov 22 2016 08:28 am

    WTC 7 won't go away......

    I agree with you. I was referring to your "WTC 7, won't go away..." comment. That's a jingle from a podcast called "No Agenda". Thought you were a listener

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Precinct 99 BBS -- p99bbs.homenet.org - Lewis Center, OH USA
  • From kk4qbn@VERT/KK4QBN to Knightmare on Fri Nov 25 11:06:33 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Knightmare to Tim Smith on Fri Nov 25 2016 02:34 am

    WTC 7 won't go away......

    I agree with you. I was referring to your "WTC 7, won't go away..." comment. That's a jingle from a podcast called "No Agenda". Thought you were a listener

    I don't listen to podcasts, Mainstream media, or any other propaganda, I try to have an objective view on everything and go from there.. whats sad is that most of the "Tinfoil hat" theories are real and coming to light. to keep it short and sweet, for all of history on this planet there has been one elite group, who rule over all others, and they will do whatever they can and say what they want to keep that power. does'nt matter who they kill, it does'nt matter what country it is.. they have power over all countries, all of the countries bow to these people, and slavery has existed forever and always will. once the slaves finally gain their voice and courage, the genocides start. race, culture, or religion makes no difference in this.. power and money is what its all about..

    all this false flag stuff and clown presidential candidates is just entertainment for the masses to keep them from knowing whats REALLY going on.

    </foilhat off>

    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)
    KK4QBN BBS

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA US
  • From Knightmare@VERT/P99BBS to kk4qbn on Fri Nov 25 21:54:26 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: kk4qbn to Knightmare on Fri Nov 25 2016 11:06 am

    WTC 7 won't go away......

    I agree with you. I was referring to your "WTC 7, won't go away..."
    comment. That's a jingle from a podcast called "No Agenda". Thought
    you were a listener

    I don't listen to podcasts, Mainstream media, or any other propaganda, I try to have an objective view on everything and go from there.. whats sad is that most of the "Tinfoil hat" theories are real and coming to light.
    [...]

    Then you've never listed to it. They do a great job at deconstruction rather then laying on the bullshit for the sheeple.

    But I digress...

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Precinct 99 BBS -- p99bbs.homenet.org - Lewis Center, OH USA
  • From cybergod@VERT/METALLIC to echicken on Sat Nov 26 06:28:00 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: echicken to cybergod on Sun Nov 20 2016 02:10 am

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to echicken on Sat Nov 19 2016 04:00:00

    im just gonna say this and then i am not going to continue this STUPID conversation with and uneducated person... there is a TON of PHYSICAL

    I'd take your opinion of me more seriously if there were the slightest indication that you'd read what I had written. This is like a blind person telling me how ugly I look; somewhat perplexing, but not so hurtful.

    evidence that we landed on the moon, and nothing to disprove it except your word... end of conversation!!

    Look ... I don't know what to tell you at this point. I literally just agre with you (that the moon landing(s) actually happened). You missed my point entirely. No matter; this is the second time you've quit this conversation, and I'll still be here to make fun of you if/when you return. For now I'm ju gonna say this: NASA or not, you're a fucking moron.

    your word... end of conversation!!

    No it isn't. See? I just continued it!

    The moon landings were an inside job! Investigate Apollo/11! loldongs!



    wow, the fact that you feel the need to continue this conversation shows your maturity level..... grow up.....


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Welcome to METALLIC DREAMS!! - bbs.metallic-dreams.com
  • From echicken@VERT/ECBBS to cybergod on Sun Nov 27 11:34:51 2016
    wow, the fact that you feel the need to continue this conversation shows your maturity level..... grow up.....

    Ah, "maturity" ... when all else fails, one can always fall back on that. If I cared what people thought about my maturity level, I wouldn't joke around half as much as I do, and life would be significantly less amusing.

    The thrust of my message was about the fact that I (and others you were raging at) are in agreement with you on the topic at hand. I'm still curious as to whether you've picked up on that yet, this being probably the fourth time I've pointed it out.

    Following up on this conversation takes a couple of minutes out of my day, so it's not much of a hardship. What's the big deal? If you're really done with this, you could just stop replying; I'm good either way.

    ---
    echicken
    electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com - 416-273-7230
    þ Synchronet þ electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com
  • From 2000man@VERT/CYBERIA to Chris on Thu Dec 1 06:29:00 2016
    That what some believe/disbelieve. I'm saving up for a trip on the Virgin Galactic...

    Previously, Chris said...

    Wait...There was a moon landing?
    Why the hell am I always the last to know about these things?!


    ... !CAUTION! Taglines may be hazardous to your disk space!
    ___ MultiMail/Win32 v0.49

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A31 (Raspberry Pi)
    * Origin: Cyberia BBS | Cyberia.Darktech.Org | Kingwood, TX
  • From cybergod@VERT/METALLIC to echicken on Thu Dec 1 23:24:00 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: echicken to cybergod on Sun Nov 27 2016 11:34 am

    wow, the fact that you feel the need to continue this conversation shows y maturity level..... grow up.....

    Ah, "maturity" ... when all else fails, one can always fall back on that. I cared what people thought about my maturity level, I wouldn't joke around ha as much as I do, and life would be significantly less amusing.

    The thrust of my message was about the fact that I (and others you were ragi at) are in agreement with you on the topic at hand. I'm still curious as to whether you've picked up on that yet, this being probably the fourth time I' pointed it out.

    Following up on this conversation takes a couple of minutes out of my day, s it's not much of a hardship. What's the big deal? If you're really done wi this, you could just stop replying; I'm good either way.


    i really dont need you to point out that people are agreeing with me... since i have pointed it out several times that i know that... i am replying to this asshole mro who is starting shit with so many people.... cause he obviously has no life...


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Welcome to METALLIC DREAMS!! - bbs.metallic-dreams.com
  • From echicken@VERT/ECBBS to cybergod on Fri Dec 2 10:14:31 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to echicken on Thu Dec 01 2016 23:24:00

    i really dont need you to point out that people are agreeing with me...

    You seem to, considering the nature of your replies and the names in the "To" field of your messages.

    since i have pointed it out several times that i know that... i am

    You very clearly replied to people who agreed with you while seeming to not realize that they did.

    replying to this asshole mro who is starting shit with so many people....

    If you're replying to him, address your reply to him. It's not rocket science. (lol rocket science get it?)

    ---
    echicken
    electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com - 416-273-7230
    þ Synchronet þ electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com
  • From cybergod@VERT/METALLIC to echicken on Sat Dec 3 20:06:00 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: echicken to cybergod on Fri Dec 02 2016 10:14 am

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to echicken on Thu Dec 01 2016 23:24:00

    i really dont need you to point out that people are agreeing with me...

    You seem to, considering the nature of your replies and the names in the "To field of your messages.

    since i have pointed it out several times that i know that... i am

    You very clearly replied to people who agreed with you while seeming to not realize that they did.

    replying to this asshole mro who is starting shit with so many people..

    If you're replying to him, address your reply to him. It's not rocket scien (lol rocket science get it?)


    then it may be both of use who lost track, because there are messages i very clearly replied correctly too and you still claim i replied incorrectly.... look this is a stupid argument , i am so done talking about this stupid stuff (fake moon landings) im really not in the mood to start another argument about who replied to who. it just blows my mind how a person like mro has not been murdered yet....


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Welcome to METALLIC DREAMS!! - bbs.metallic-dreams.com
  • From echicken@VERT/ECBBS to cybergod on Sun Dec 4 12:47:19 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to echicken on Sat Dec 03 2016 20:06:00

    then it may be both of use who lost track, because there are messages i very clearly replied correctly too and you still claim i replied

    I don't think so. My point is that you should mind who you're replying to, and do them the courtesy of actually reading their messages first.

    incorrectly.... look this is a stupid argument , i am so done talking about this stupid stuff (fake moon landings) im really not in the mood to

    Like I've said, I don't care about the moon landings. Communication interests me, though - and this has been a hilarious clusterfuck.

    If you're done, as you keep saying, you can just stop replying at any time.

    start another argument about who replied to who. it just blows my mind how

    There's nothing to argue about. Just do better in the future.

    a person like mro has not been murdered yet....

    Oh hey hey now take it the fuck easy there. Is that the kind of world you want to live in? Because it's not the world that we actually live in, and be grateful for that. If murder was a likely consequence of being stupid and/or rude, lots of people would be in serious trouble.

    ---
    echicken
    electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com - 416-273-7230
    þ Synchronet þ electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com
  • From kk4qbn@VERT/KK4QBN to echicken on Sun Dec 4 13:24:29 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: echicken to cybergod on Sun Dec 04 2016 12:47 pm

    Oh hey hey now take it the fuck easy there. Is that the kind of world you want to live in? Because it's not the world that we actually live in, and be grateful for that. If murder was a likely consequence of being stupid and/or rude, lots of people would be in serious trouble.

    LOL, I dislike many people, But cannot go as far to say that I even hate them, much less murder, wow.. Kinda hope I never find this guy in the Mundane world.

    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)
    KK4QBN BBS

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA US
  • From cybergod@VERT/METALLIC to echicken on Sat Dec 31 02:37:00 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: echicken to cybergod on Sun Dec 04 2016 12:47 pm

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to echicken on Sat Dec 03 2016 20:06:00

    then it may be both of use who lost track, because there are messages i very clearly replied correctly too and you still claim i replied

    I don't think so. My point is that you should mind who you're replying to, do them the courtesy of actually reading their messages first.

    incorrectly.... look this is a stupid argument , i am so done talking about this stupid stuff (fake moon landings) im really not in the mood

    Like I've said, I don't care about the moon landings. Communication interes me, though - and this has been a hilarious clusterfuck.

    If you're done, as you keep saying, you can just stop replying at any time.

    start another argument about who replied to who. it just blows my mind

    There's nothing to argue about. Just do better in the future.

    a person like mro has not been murdered yet....

    Oh hey hey now take it the fuck easy there. Is that the kind of world you w to live in? Because it's not the world that we actually live in, and be grateful for that. If murder was a likely consequence of being stupid and/o rude, lots of people would be in serious trouble.



    just to clarify, in case you are unsure, i AM replying to you echicken, please stop trying to educate me, i find it funny how you feel the need to break down my post into almost bullet points so you can remediate me on where i went wrong in each and every point, again i know who i am replying to and i also know that people read messages who are the intended reader even though they are not the one posting i.e. mro was going to read a message containinghis original post, alowing me to post to him.is that clear enough? also is you thaught i was "done" with this conversation then why did you bother to continue your educational session? nor do i need YOU to tell me to just "do better" (not sure what that means) in my conversations with other people, now if you are done bestowing this moment of clarity onto me i am going now, but before i do you should be aware (since you tell me we dont live in that kind of world) i have seen people beaten to within an inch of there lives for doing far less when it comes to pissing someone off then mro seems to have done...


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Welcome to METALLIC DREAMS!! - bbs.metallic-dreams.com
  • From echicken@VERT/ECBBS to cybergod on Sat Dec 31 13:28:43 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to echicken on Sat Dec 31 2016 02:37:00

    just to clarify, in case you are unsure, i AM replying to you echicken,

    It's not that I'm unsure of who you're replying to ... it's that you appear unsure of who said what. I can read what name is in the "To" field of a message.

    please stop trying to educate me, i find it funny how you feel the need to break down my post into almost bullet points so you can remediate me on where i went wrong in each and every point, again i know who i am replying

    It's just inline quoting. I'm not breaking your messages down into bullet points; that implies some effort of editing and paraphrasing. I'm just quoting parts of your message and replying to them in turn. It's a fairly normal way of replying to a message, though I'm not shocked that it's a new concept for you.

    to and i also know that people read messages who are the intended reader even though they are not the one posting i.e. mro was going to read a message containinghis original post, alowing me to post to him.is that clear enough? also is you thaught i was "done" with this conversation then

    No, that tangle of word-spaghetti is not clear enough. I don't really care, though, so don't waste your time rephrasing it for my benefit.

    clear enough? also is you thaught i was "done" with this conversation then why did you bother to continue your educational session? nor do i need YOU

    Because I felt like replying, and I didn't actually believe that you were done.
    And hey, look ... you're still here.

    why did you bother to continue your educational session? nor do i need YOU to tell me to just "do better" (not sure what that means) in my

    Well, you do need somebody to tell it to you. I'm not surprised that you don't get it. Anyway, it was intended as a joke; maybe I should have thrown in a bunch of smileys so :D that :D you'd :D pick :D up :D on :D it.

    (since you tell me we dont live in that kind of world) i have seen people beaten to within an inch of there lives for doing far less when it comes to pissing someone off then mro seems to have done...

    I'll accept that there are horrible people out there who would hurt (kill, was it?) somebody else for saying something rude or stupid, but I don't think it's common. I don't feel the need to censor myself for fear of being beaten to death; I live in a civilized part of the world. It's a silly concept to invoke in almost any discussion, especially the one at hand.

    Also, even though you're not actually threatening anyone, you legitimize that sort of violence by referencing it in an effort to shut somebody else up. That's pathetic and no decent way of carrying on a conversation.

    ---
    echicken
    electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com - 416-273-7230
    þ Synchronet þ electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com
  • From Mro@VERT/BBSESINF to cybergod on Sat Dec 31 16:45:10 2016
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to echicken on Sat Dec 31 2016 02:37 am

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    incorrectly.... look this is a stupid argument , i am so done talking about this stupid stuff (fake moon landings) im really not in the mood
    start another argument about who replied to who. it just blows my mind
    There's nothing to argue about. Just do better in the future.

    a person like mro has not been murdered yet....


    just to clarify, in case you are unsure, i AM replying to you echicken, please stop trying to educate me, i find it funny how you feel the need to break down my post into almost bullet points so you can remediate me on where i went wrong in each and every point, again i know who i am replying



    "i find it funny" what a complete fool you are. almost every post you've contributed to dovenet has been an embarassment to you and detrimental to proof of your value as a human being.

    you get confused and irate over obvious joking around, throw insults at everyone and you don't contribute jack shit to the bbs community.

    regarding your death threat, come at me. you're nothing but a bitch and i'll break my foot off in your ass.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From cybergod@VERT/METALLIC to echicken on Mon Jan 2 14:11:00 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: echicken to cybergod on Sat Dec 31 2016 01:28 pm

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to echicken on Sat Dec 31 2016 02:37:00

    just to clarify, in case you are unsure, i AM replying to you echicken,

    It's not that I'm unsure of who you're replying to ... it's that you appear unsure of who said what. I can read what name is in the "To" field of a message.

    please stop trying to educate me, i find it funny how you feel the need break down my post into almost bullet points so you can remediate me on where i went wrong in each and every point, again i know who i am reply

    It's just inline quoting. I'm not breaking your messages down into bullet points; that implies some effort of editing and paraphrasing. I'm just quoti parts of your message and replying to them in turn. It's a fairly normal wa of replying to a message, though I'm not shocked that it's a new concept for you.

    to and i also know that people read messages who are the intended reade even though they are not the one posting i.e. mro was going to read a message containinghis original post, alowing me to post to him.is that clear enough? also is you thaught i was "done" with this conversation t

    No, that tangle of word-spaghetti is not clear enough. I don't really care, though, so don't waste your time rephrasing it for my benefit.

    clear enough? also is you thaught i was "done" with this conversation t why did you bother to continue your educational session? nor do i need

    Because I felt like replying, and I didn't actually believe that you were do
    And hey, look ... you're still here.

    why did you bother to continue your educational session? nor do i need to tell me to just "do better" (not sure what that means) in my

    Well, you do need somebody to tell it to you. I'm not surprised that you do get it. Anyway, it was intended as a joke; maybe I should have thrown in a bunch of smileys so :D that :D you'd :D pick :D up :D on :D it.

    (since you tell me we dont live in that kind of world) i have seen peop beaten to within an inch of there lives for doing far less when it come to pissing someone off then mro seems to have done...

    I'll accept that there are horrible people out there who would hurt (kill, w it?) somebody else for saying something rude or stupid, but I don't think it common. I don't feel the need to censor myself for fear of being beaten to death; I live in a civilized part of the world. It's a silly concept to inv in almost any discussion, especially the one at hand.

    Also, even though you're not actually threatening anyone, you legitimize tha sort of violence by referencing it in an effort to shut somebody else up. That's pathetic and no decent way of carrying on a conversation.



    oh look!! here YOU are again too!! and look, another bullet point! well anyway just to clarify i am very much aware of who said what in this conversation and others, unlike you my memory is longer then 5 minutes (as illustrated by the fact that you have to bullet point each attack)

    i am also quite cabable of remembering my last post so you dont need to give my a point by point breakdown of THE ENTIRE MESSAGE...

    you also claim "you dont care" pretty much about anything i said in the last message but yet you took the time to rehash the whole damn thing? let me guess you are one of those lifeless online nerds who has nothing going on other then sitting in his room allday posting and commenting on messages... that about sum it up? (not actually expecting and answer because it would be a lie)

    anyway you also stupid point about threatening violance is perthetic and not a decent way to carry on a conversation is also morronic sine "we" are not nor was mro and i having a conversation, THIS is called an argument and in this fake civil part of the world you live in many arguments have been know to escalate to that level, because humans are not civilized and your belief that there is any pert of the world that is truely civilized is hilarious, you might learn that is you pulled yourself away from you computer once in a while and went outside....

    so now.... lets see how long it take you to send me another bullet point...

    looser....


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Welcome to METALLIC DREAMS!! - bbs.metallic-dreams.com
  • From cybergod@VERT/METALLIC to Mro on Mon Jan 2 14:21:00 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Mro to cybergod on Sat Dec 31 2016 04:45 pm

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to echicken on Sat Dec 31 2016 02:37 am

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    incorrectly.... look this is a stupid argument , i am so done talking about this stupid stuff (fake moon landings) im really no in the mood
    start another argument about who replied to who. it just blows my mind
    There's nothing to argue about. Just do better in the future.

    a person like mro has not been murdered yet....


    just to clarify, in case you are unsure, i AM replying to you echicken, please stop trying to educate me, i find it funny how you feel the need t break down my post into almost bullet points so you can remediate me on where i went wrong in each and every point, again i know who i am replyin



    "i find it funny" what a complete fool you are. almost every post you've contributed to dovenet has been an embarassment to you and detrimental to pr of your value as a human being.

    you get confused and irate over obvious joking around, throw insults at everyone and you don't contribute jack shit to the bbs community.

    regarding your death threat, come at me. you're nothing but a bitch and i'll break my foot off in your ass.


    oh look the fagot is back...

    mro, the the hell do you contribute to the BBS community may i ask? except to piss people off? i run my own bbs i have several hundred users and my BBS has made it into a BBS mag! what do you got? nothing?

    and your conter threat of violance is REAL tough, since you know i will never meet you in real life, of course you could be a man and post you address up next time so people could come and take you up on your offer, no? i didnt think so...

    its funny mro but alot of people have been saying what a peice of shit you are, baybe you should be the last to tell anyone that they dont contribute to the BBS community and stop posting forever.... but you wont because you get off on pissing people off....

    eat a dick!!


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Welcome to METALLIC DREAMS!! - bbs.metallic-dreams.com
  • From echicken@VERT/ECBBS to cybergod on Tue Jan 3 13:08:13 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to echicken on Mon Jan 02 2017 14:11:00

    you also claim "you dont care" pretty much about anything i said in the last message but yet you took the time to rehash the whole damn thing? let

    No ... you asked me if you'd made something "clear enough"; I said that you hadn't, but that I didn't care about that particular point. I quoted the paragraph in question and put my reply after it so that you'd know which part of your message I was referring to. You may dislike my "bullet points", but they serve a purpose.

    me guess you are one of those lifeless online nerds who has nothing going on other then sitting in his room allday posting and commenting on messages... that about sum it up? (not actually expecting and answer

    Oh wow, that stings. I'm not sure if I'll be able to go on living after receiving a burn like that.

    anyway you also stupid point about threatening violance is perthetic and not a decent way to carry on a conversation is also morronic sine "we" are not nor was mro and i having a conversation, THIS is called an argument

    People have arguments all the time without threatening to hurt one another. It's not necessary to bring up "violance" every time you get angry - that's just "perthetic".

    and in this fake civil part of the world you live in many arguments have been know to escalate to that level, because humans are not civilized and

    I did concede that arguments do escalate to violence on occasion. I continue to think that it's a silly thing to bring up in an online discussion. You're using the violence of whatever anarchic cesspool you live in as a means to shut someone else up. It's a lousy fallback for people who've run out of words.

    your belief that there is any pert of the world that is truely civilized is hilarious, you might learn that is you pulled yourself away from you computer once in a while and went outside....

    I guess we could discuss what "truly civilized" means. Your assumptions aside, I go outside every day, into the most populous city in my country, and I manage to survive the ordeal unscathed nearly every time. I only got stabbed twice in 2016, and I haven't sustained a gunshot wound in over five years.

    I think most people in my part of the world would agree that we live in a civilization, despite the fact that there are unstable individuals in our midst, despite the fact that there is still crime and we still need police, etc. Shit happens, but most of us live out our lives and piss off a few people along the way without being mutilated in the process. I think that would be very different if we didn't have the apparatus of civilization keeping things in check.

    looser....

    What is looser than what? I'm not sure what you're getting at.

    ---
    echicken
    electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com - 416-273-7230
    þ Synchronet þ electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com
  • From kk4qbn@VERT/KK4QBN to cybergod on Tue Jan 3 12:29:04 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to echicken on Mon Jan 02 2017 02:11 pm

    looser....

    Looser?


    Why don't you people DROP this thread already... its over... I've twitted MRO, not because the childish way he carries himself, but for the personal attacks he made against My family, My Sobriety, and Myself. and the pure lies he has manufactured. if not for that, I could just about call the idiot an acquainence. (yea, thats spelled wrong) fuck it.


    BUT DAMN PEOPLE... just DAMN..

    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)
    KK4QBN BBS

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA US
  • From Mro@VERT/BBSESINF to cybergod on Tue Jan 3 17:37:11 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to echicken on Mon Jan 02 2017 02:11 pm

    oh look!! here YOU are again too!! and look, another bullet point! well anyway just to clarify i am very much aware of who said what in this conversation and others, unlike you my memory is longer then 5 minutes (as illustrated by the fact that you have to bullet point each attack)


    + SIR, you have made a terrible mistake and i am filing a police report. i will have choice of venue so i hope you ENJOY LONDON!

    i am also quite cabable of remembering my last post so you dont need to give

    + you dont really NEED to remember your last post; you can use command keys to go back in thread by subject or author.

    anyway you also stupid point about threatening violance is perthetic and not a decent way to carry on a conversation is also morronic sine "we" are not nor was mro and i having a conversation, THIS is called an argument and in


    + arguments are my form of conversation.

    so now.... lets see how long it take you to send me another bullet point...

    +
    looser....


    looser than what?
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Mro@VERT/BBSESINF to cybergod on Tue Jan 3 17:41:56 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to Mro on Mon Jan 02 2017 02:21 pm

    mro, the the hell do you contribute to the BBS community may i ask? except

    that shows how stupid you are.

    i run my own bbs i have several hundred users


    several hundred first time callers that never came back.


    and my BBS
    has made it into a BBS mag!


    HAHAHAHAHAHAAAA

    and your conter threat of violance is REAL tough, since you know i will never meet you in real life, of course you could be a man and post you


    How do you know that? i've met people that i've talked to online in real life.

    never meet you in real life, of course you could be a man and post you address up next time so people could come and take you up on your offer, no?

    why would i post my address? i'd rather visit you. you dont know when i'd be home. i frequent strip clubs and casinos at odd hours.

    its funny mro but alot of people have been saying what a peice of shit you are,

    it's just people that have permanent butthurt from the years of abuse at my hand. it's so bad some of them have to stick tampons up their ass several times a day.

    baybe you

    i barely know you! i'm not your baybe.

    to the BBS community and stop posting forever.... but you wont because you

    when i leave, everything goes to shit.

    get off on pissing people off....

    i'd rather piss on than piss off.
    eat a dick!!

    GAY
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Mro@VERT/BBSESINF to kk4qbn on Tue Jan 3 17:46:50 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: kk4qbn to cybergod on Tue Jan 03 2017 12:29 pm

    Why don't you people DROP this thread already... its over... I've twitted MRO, not because the childish way he carries himself, but for the personal attacks he made against My family, My Sobriety, and Myself. and the pure lies he has manufactured. if not for that, I could just about call the idiot


    I've never talked about your family.
    dont know a damn thing about your family other than i was your fb friend
    and you mentioned living with them. (this was yeeears ago)

    all i said is i talked to a bbs sysop who said you gave him some sob story
    and you ended up using what you got from him on drugs. which, fits in with the type of person you were back then.

    i never manufactured anything and years ago (BTW, THIS IS A LONG TIME AGO AND TIM HERE CANT SHUT UP ABOUT IT) i mentioned who it was and you said it was true and you made a mistake and said you went through a rough patch and you got into trouble with the law for drug possession,etc.

    i'm glad you are sober if that's true. honestly i am. but seems like you have these made up or confused memories and it might be due/partially due to your years of drug abuse.

    again, good luck.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Ralph Smole@VERT/NIMBUS to cybergod on Tue Jan 3 21:33:46 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to echicken on Mon Jan 02 2017 02:11 pm

    Y'all need to GROW THE FUCK UP! I've seen more intelligent conversations between 3 year old kids. UNBELIEVABLE.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Nimbus BBS - nimbus.synchro.net
  • From Chris@VERT/DMINE to Ralph Smole on Tue Jan 3 23:56:06 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Ralph Smole to cybergod on Tue Jan 03 2017 09:33 pm

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to echicken on Mon Jan 02 2017 02:11 pm

    Y'all need to GROW THE FUCK UP! I've seen more intelligent conversations between 3 year old kids. UNBELIEVABLE.


    I know I *should* be above all this, but this thread is entertaining as hell right now. I'm kind of hoping it makes it to 2018 ;-)

    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    CDP
    The Diamond Mine BBS - telnet://bbs.dmine.net
    The Retro Room - http://forums.delphiforums.com/retroroom ------------------------------------------------------------------

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Diamond Mine Online - bbs.dmine.net - Fredericksburg, VA USA
  • From kk4qbn@VERT/KK4QBN to Ralph Smole on Wed Jan 4 00:12:40 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Ralph Smole to cybergod on Tue Jan 03 2017 09:33 pm

    Y'all need to GROW THE FUCK UP! I've seen more intelligent conversations between 3 year old kids. UNBELIEVABLE.


    But... Moon... Russia... stuff...

    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)
    KK4QBN BBS

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA US
  • From Poindexter Fortran@VERT/REALITY to Mro on Tue Jan 3 17:44:00 2017
    Mro wrote to cybergod <=-

    + SIR, you have made a terrible mistake and i am filing a police
    report. i will have choice of venue so i hope you ENJOY LONDON!


    I miss ZIPPY THE PINHEAD. The author was the master of CAPITALIZED
    WORDS FOR EMPHASIS!



    ... Do nothing for as long as possible
    --- MultiMail/Win32 v0.49
    þ Synchronet þ realitycheckBBS -- http://realitycheckBBS.org
  • From Poindexter Fortran@VERT/REALITY to Mro on Tue Jan 3 17:45:00 2017
    Mro wrote to cybergod <=-

    several hundred first time callers that never came back.


    One dude that passed out on the enter key and redialed all night
    long...



    ... Where is my EXECUTE key?
    --- MultiMail/Win32 v0.49
    þ Synchronet þ realitycheckBBS -- http://realitycheckBBS.org
  • From Mro@VERT/BBSESINF to Poindexter Fortran on Wed Jan 4 21:59:36 2017
    Re: Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Poindexter Fortran to Mro on Tue Jan 03 2017 05:45 pm

    Mro wrote to cybergod <=-

    several hundred first time callers that never came back.


    One dude that passed out on the enter key and redialed all night
    long...


    i had one guy like that. it was 2 years ago. something went wrong with his client or he had a setting and it connected, disconnected, connected for like 2 days before i blocked him.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From K7elh@VERT/EYESTORM to kk4qbn on Sun Jan 8 21:48:54 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: kk4qbn to Ralph Smole on Wed Jan 04 2017 12:12 am

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Ralph Smole to cybergod on Tue Jan 03 2017 09:33 pm
    conversations between 3 year old kids. UNBELIEVABLE.
    But... Moon... Russia... stuff...
    --
    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)
    KK4QBN BBS

    No kidding....

    Eric, K7ELH
    Eye of the Storm BBS
    bbs.k6sdg.org

    --
    Eric Hutchins, K7ELH
    Sysop
    Eye of the Storm BBS
    bbs.k6sdg.org

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Eye of the Storm - bbs.k6sdg.org
  • From Mro@VERT/BBSESINF to K7elh on Mon Jan 9 00:17:16 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: K7elh to kk4qbn on Sun Jan 08 2017 09:48 pm

    No kidding....

    Eric, K7ELH
    Eye of the Storm BBS
    bbs.k6sdg.org

    Eric Hutchins, K7ELH
    Sysop
    Eye of the Storm BBS
    bbs.k6sdg.org



    you have 2 sigs there, smart guy
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From K7elh@VERT/EYESTORM to Mro on Mon Jan 9 21:26:44 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Mro to K7elh on Sun Jan 08 2017 10:17 pm

    you have 2 sigs there, smart guy

    Forgot I had the sig setup already...

    ;-) Ooops


    --
    Eric Hutchins, K7ELH
    Sysop
    Eye of the Storm BBS
    bbs.k6sdg.org

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Eye of the Storm - bbs.k6sdg.org
  • From cybergod@VERT/METALLIC to echicken on Tue Jan 10 00:43:00 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: echicken to cybergod on Tue Jan 03 2017 01:08 pm

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to echicken on Mon Jan 02 2017 14:11:00

    you also claim "you dont care" pretty much about anything i said in the last message but yet you took the time to rehash the whole damn thing?

    No ... you asked me if you'd made something "clear enough"; I said that you hadn't, but that I didn't care about that particular point. I quoted the paragraph in question and put my reply after it so that you'd know which par of your message I was referring to. You may dislike my "bullet points", but they serve a purpose.

    me guess you are one of those lifeless online nerds who has nothing goi on other then sitting in his room allday posting and commenting on messages... that about sum it up? (not actually expecting and answer

    Oh wow, that stings. I'm not sure if I'll be able to go on living after receiving a burn like that.

    anyway you also stupid point about threatening violance is perthetic an not a decent way to carry on a conversation is also morronic sine "we" not nor was mro and i having a conversation, THIS is called an argument

    People have arguments all the time without threatening to hurt one another. It's not necessary to bring up "violance" every time you get angry - that's just "perthetic".

    and in this fake civil part of the world you live in many arguments hav been know to escalate to that level, because humans are not civilized a

    I did concede that arguments do escalate to violence on occasion. I continu to think that it's a silly thing to bring up in an online discussion. You'r using the violence of whatever anarchic cesspool you live in as a means to s someone else up. It's a lousy fallback for people who've run out of words.

    your belief that there is any pert of the world that is truely civilize is hilarious, you might learn that is you pulled yourself away from you computer once in a while and went outside....

    I guess we could discuss what "truly civilized" means. Your assumptions asi I go outside every day, into the most populous city in my country, and I man to survive the ordeal unscathed nearly every time. I only got stabbed twice 2016, and I haven't sustained a gunshot wound in over five years.

    I think most people in my part of the world would agree that we live in a civilization, despite the fact that there are unstable individuals in our midst, despite the fact that there is still crime and we still need police, etc. Shit happens, but most of us live out our lives and piss off a few peop along the way without being mutilated in the process. I think that would be very different if we didn't have the apparatus of civilization keeping thing in check.

    looser....

    What is looser than what? I'm not sure what you're getting at.




    you know i started reading your reply and then i realized.... i dont care what you have to say...

    you are one of those people who thinks they know it and obviously feel the need to educate people....... you opinions are one sided.... you believe them to be fact.... you are wrong.......

    i will not even read your next post so dont bother to reply....


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Welcome to METALLIC DREAMS!! - bbs.metallic-dreams.com
  • From cybergod@VERT/METALLIC to Mro on Tue Jan 10 00:47:00 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Mro to cybergod on Tue Jan 03 2017 05:37 pm

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to echicken on Mon Jan 02 2017 02:11 pm

    oh look!! here YOU are again too!! and look, another bullet point! well anyway just to clarify i am very much aware of who said what in this conversation and others, unlike you my memory is longer then 5 minutes (a illustrated by the fact that you have to bullet point each attack)


    + SIR, you have made a terrible mistake and i am filing a police report. i w have choice of venue so i hope you ENJOY LONDON!

    i am also quite cabable of remembering my last post so you dont need to g

    + you dont really NEED to remember your last post; you can use command keys go back in thread by subject or author.

    anyway you also stupid point about threatening violance is perthetic and a decent way to carry on a conversation is also morronic sine "we" are no nor was mro and i having a conversation, THIS is called an argument and i


    + arguments are my form of conversation.

    so now.... lets see how long it take you to send me another bullet point.

    +
    looser....


    looser than what?


    im not sure what that dumb comment about a police report was about.... let me know if it was a threat so i can laugh....

    wait... never mind..... i dont care.....

    dont bother replying i wond read any further posts from you...

    and if arguments are your form of conversation you should stop talking to everyone else too...


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Welcome to METALLIC DREAMS!! - bbs.metallic-dreams.com
  • From cybergod@VERT/METALLIC to Ralph Smole on Tue Jan 10 00:48:00 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Ralph Smole to cybergod on Tue Jan 03 2017 09:33 pm

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to echicken on Mon Jan 02 2017 02:11 pm

    Y'all need to GROW THE FUCK UP! I've seen more intelligent conversations between 3 year old kids. UNBELIEVABLE.



    y'all is not and has never been a word....



    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Welcome to METALLIC DREAMS!! - bbs.metallic-dreams.com
  • From cybergod@VERT/METALLIC to Mro on Tue Jan 10 00:51:00 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Mro to cybergod on Tue Jan 03 2017 05:41 pm

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to Mro on Mon Jan 02 2017 02:21 pm

    mro, the the hell do you contribute to the BBS community may i ask? excep

    that shows how stupid you are.

    i run my own bbs i have several hundred users


    several hundred first time callers that never came back.


    and my BBS
    has made it into a BBS mag!


    HAHAHAHAHAHAAAA

    and your conter threat of violance is REAL tough, since you know i will never meet you in real life, of course you could be a man and post you


    How do you know that? i've met people that i've talked to online in real lif

    never meet you in real life, of course you could be a man and post you address up next time so people could come and take you up on your offer,

    why would i post my address? i'd rather visit you. you dont know when i'd b home. i frequent strip clubs and casinos at odd hours.

    its funny mro but alot of people have been saying what a peice of shit yo are,

    it's just people that have permanent butthurt from the years of abuse at my hand. it's so bad some of them have to stick tampons up their ass several ti a day.

    baybe you

    i barely know you! i'm not your baybe.

    to the BBS community and stop posting forever.... but you wont because yo

    when i leave, everything goes to shit.

    get off on pissing people off....

    i'd rather piss on than piss off.
    eat a dick!!

    GAY


    you are a true morron

    you sound like a real scumbag.... eat a dick....


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Welcome to METALLIC DREAMS!! - bbs.metallic-dreams.com
  • From KK4QBN@VERT/KK4QBN to cybergod on Tue Jan 10 08:18:09 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to echicken on Tue Jan 10 2017 12:43 am

    you know i started reading your reply and then i realized.... i dont care what you have to say...
    you are one of those people who thinks they know it and obviously feel the need to educate people....... you opinions are one sided.... you believe them to be fact.... you are wrong.......

    Actually, afaik echicken knows a good bunch of crap, he wrote or ported a whole bunch of cool door games, and a sweet web suite for sbbs, and can spell loser correctly.. he's got that going for him..

    Echicken pissed me off once, but I got over it.. most this crap is just in jest man.. take it with a grain of salt.. I do.. except when somene calls me a thief , I've worked hard to keep a honest disposition with everyone, even through active drug addiction, and when someone calls me a thief it really sets me off.

    Otherwise.. life goes on.. and hopefully it can for you too..

    i will not even read your next post so dont bother to reply....

    He probably don't care, you're possible even posting to the wrong person again so what does it matter.

    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)
    KK4QBN BBS

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA US
  • From KK4QBN@VERT/KK4QBN to cybergod on Tue Jan 10 08:19:59 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to Ralph Smole on Tue Jan 10 2017 12:48 am

    Y'all need to GROW THE FUCK UP! I've seen more intelligent
    conversations between 3 year old kids. UNBELIEVABLE.



    y'all is not and has never been a word....

    BLASPHEMY!


    Ralph is from Texas... I'm from GA, Y'all is a word in both these states and probably more states in the US then it IS'NT a word.. and I'm sure, wherever you're from you have a few slang words flying around that we woul have no idea wtf you're even talking about.. well maybe we would because Us folks that use the word Ya'll are quite intelligeble and can understand them big words.. and cipherin too..



    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)
    KK4QBN BBS


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA US
  • From echicken@VERT/ECBBS to KK4QBN on Tue Jan 10 10:18:04 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: KK4QBN to cybergod on Tue Jan 10 2017 08:18:09

    Actually, afaik echicken knows a good bunch of crap, he wrote or ported a

    I appreciate it, but FWIW I'm not too concerned with what 'cybergod' thinks of me. Being called a perthetic looser morron doesn't sting as much as I might have feared. Anyway, we're all entitled to our opinions. :D

    Echicken pissed me off once, but I got over it.. most this crap is just in

    Well, sorry about that. I do have a way with people. Not a good way, but a way.

    ---
    echicken
    electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com - 416-273-7230
    þ Synchronet þ electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com
  • From tfurrows@VERT/KK4QBN to cybergod on Tue Jan 10 11:50:34 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to Ralph Smole on Tue Jan 10 2017 12:48 am

    y'all is not and has never been a word....

    Well, you know, since there's an apostraphe in there, the author isn't using it as "a word," they're using it as a contraction of two words. It's a commonly used one that most Americans will understand and have context for immediately, though I'm not sure the same could be said for a more global audience. Still, I think it's pretty easy to understand.

    Correct me if I'm wrong, this system may be a "dictionary words only" zone, but it seems like in a topic as broad and stupid as this one has been, anything goes. I'm more bothered by the lower-case "i" that I keep seeing...

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA US
  • From KK4QBN@VERT/KK4QBN to echicken on Tue Jan 10 12:54:39 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: echicken to KK4QBN on Tue Jan 10 2017 10:18 am

    Well, sorry about that. I do have a way with people. Not a good way, but a way.

    me too... guess its the human condition..

    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)
    KK4QBN BBS

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA US
  • From KK4QBN@VERT/KK4QBN to tfurrows on Tue Jan 10 12:55:41 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: tfurrows to cybergod on Tue Jan 10 2017 11:50 am

    Correct me if I'm wrong, this system may be a "dictionary words only" zone, but it seems like in a topic as broad and stupid as this one has been, anything goes. I'm more bothered by the lower-case "i" that I keep seeing...

    i am offended by that, where is my safeplace...

    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)
    KK4QBN BBS

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA US
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to tfurrows on Tue Jan 10 12:44:57 2017
    Correct me if I'm wrong, this system may be a "dictionary words only" zone, but it seems like in a topic as broad and stupid as this one has been, anything goes. I'm more bothered by the lower-case "i" that I keep seeing...

    Some people (who will remain nameless) don't seem to be able to use the shift key to make uppercase letters.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Mro@VERT/BBSESINF to cybergod on Tue Jan 10 18:23:58 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to echicken on Tue Jan 10 2017 12:43 am

    you know i started reading your reply and then i realized.... i dont care what you have to say...

    you are one of those people who thinks they know it and obviously feel the need to educate people....... you opinions are one sided.... you believe them to be fact.... you are wrong.......

    i will not even read your next post so dont bother to reply....



    well he's an educated person for a canadian, so you dont have to go THAT far.

    i think you WILL read his next post.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Mro@VERT/BBSESINF to cybergod on Tue Jan 10 18:25:11 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to Mro on Tue Jan 10 2017 12:47 am

    so now.... lets see how long it take you to send me another bullet point.

    +
    looser....


    looser than what?


    im not sure what that dumb comment about a police report was about.... let me know if it was a threat so i can laugh....

    wait... never mind..... i dont care.....



    if you didnt care you wouldnt be replying, faggot.

    dont bother replying i wond read any further posts from you...


    YES YOU WILL.

    and if arguments are your form of conversation you should stop talking to everyone else too...

    SORRY, cyberdouche. been here before you and i will be here long after you are gone.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Mro@VERT/BBSESINF to cybergod on Tue Jan 10 18:26:04 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to Ralph Smole on Tue Jan 10 2017 12:48 am

    Y'all need to GROW THE FUCK UP! I've seen more intelligent conversations between 3 year old kids. UNBELIEVABLE.



    y'all is not and has never been a word....


    "y'all' is a contraction of you and all.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Mro@VERT/BBSESINF to cybergod on Tue Jan 10 18:27:25 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to Mro on Tue Jan 10 2017 12:51 am

    eat a dick!!

    GAY


    you are a true morron
    ^^^^^^ SPELLED WRONG!!!!!

    you sound like a real scumbag.... eat a dick....

    GAY


    btw, i thought you said you werent going to read any of my posts.. and here you are.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Mro@VERT/BBSESINF to Nightfox on Tue Jan 10 18:31:12 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Nightfox to tfurrows on Tue Jan 10 2017 12:44 pm

    Correct me if I'm wrong, this system may be a "dictionary words only" zone, but it seems like in a topic as broad and stupid as this one has been, anything goes. I'm more bothered by the lower-case "i" that I keep seeing...

    Some people (who will remain nameless) don't seem to be able to use the shift key to make uppercase letters.



    i am that looser morron that doesnt care enough to use the shift key.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Ralph Smole@VERT/NIMBUS to cybergod on Tue Jan 10 21:04:08 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to Ralph Smole on Tue Jan 10 2017 12:48 am

    y'all is not and has never been a word....
    DId I offend your feeble mind? I hope so.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Nimbus BBS - nimbus.synchro.net
  • From Ralph Smole@VERT/NIMBUS to KK4QBN on Tue Jan 10 21:05:47 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: KK4QBN to cybergod on Tue Jan 10 2017 08:19 am

    Ralph is from Texas... I'm from GA, Y'all is a word in both these states and probably more states in the US then it IS'NT a word.. and I'm sure, wherever you're from you have a few slang words flying around that we woul have no id wtf you're even talking about.. well maybe we would because Us folks that us the word Ya'll are quite intelligeble and can understand them big words.. an cipherin too..
    WELL said :-) The only slang word that moron fixates on is DICK.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Nimbus BBS - nimbus.synchro.net
  • From KK4QBN@VERT/KK4QBN to Mro on Tue Jan 10 23:39:03 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Mro to Nightfox on Tue Jan 10 2017 06:31 pm

    Some people (who will remain nameless) don't seem to be able to use
    the shift key to make uppercase letters.



    i am that looser morron that doesnt care enough to use the shift key.

    i don't either most of the time, nor do I care to make my statements gramatically correct.. think I'll find an ANSI of grammar nazis marching to leave as a quote to some of the messages..

    I understand the difference in being incoherent, example, I drung 6 beer and see 15 different instances of once sentence and do the best I can, but thats why I never drink beer anymore either.. Only a shot of Vodka once in a while, or some Crown.

    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)
    KK4QBN BBS

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA US
  • From KK4QBN@VERT/KK4QBN to Ralph Smole on Tue Jan 10 23:44:13 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Ralph Smole to KK4QBN on Tue Jan 10 2017 09:05 pm

    Ralph is from Texas... I'm from GA, Y'all is a word in both these
    states and probably more states in the US then it IS'NT a word.. and
    WELL said :-) The only slang word that moron fixates on is DICK.

    I'm trying my best to be reserved and polite on the networks now, but I'm still LMAO, I'll leave it at that..

    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)
    KK4QBN BBS

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA US
  • From Mro@VERT/BBSESINF to Ralph Smole on Tue Jan 10 23:48:41 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Ralph Smole to KK4QBN on Tue Jan 10 2017 09:05 pm

    woul have no id wtf you're even talking about.. well maybe we would because Us folks that us the word Ya'll are quite intelligeble and can understand them big words.. an cipherin too..

    WELL said :-) The only slang word that moron fixates on is DICK.


    *morron
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From KK4QBN@VERT/KK4QBN to Mro on Wed Jan 11 11:54:24 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Mro to Ralph Smole on Tue Jan 10 2017 11:48 pm

    WELL said :-) The only slang word that moron fixates on is DICK.


    *morron

    are you calling him a Pepper, or trying to correct his spelling, because he had it right the first time.. unless your trying to emphasise a slang MO-RON..

    BTLFOOM

    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)
    KK4QBN BBS

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA US
  • From Mro@VERT/BBSESINF to KK4QBN on Wed Jan 11 17:59:42 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: KK4QBN to Mro on Wed Jan 11 2017 11:54 am

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Mro to Ralph Smole on Tue Jan 10 2017 11:48 pm

    WELL said :-) The only slang word that moron fixates on is DICK.


    *morron

    are you calling him a Pepper, or trying to correct his spelling, because he had it right the first time.. unless your trying to emphasise a slang


    cpugod spells it looser morron
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From KK4QBN@VERT/KK4QBN to Mro on Thu Jan 12 01:17:41 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Mro to KK4QBN on Wed Jan 11 2017 05:59 pm

    cpugod spells it looser morron

    I think I get it now.. maybe.. possibly a crude attempt at humor.

    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)
    KK4QBN BBS

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA US
  • From cybergod@VERT/METALLIC to KK4QBN on Wed Jan 11 13:14:00 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: KK4QBN to cybergod on Tue Jan 10 2017 08:18 am

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to echicken on Tue Jan 10 2017 12:43 am

    you know i started reading your reply and then i realized.... i dont ca what you have to say...
    you are one of those people who thinks they know it and obviously feel need to educate people....... you opinions are one sided.... you believ them to be fact.... you are wrong.......

    Actually, afaik echicken knows a good bunch of crap, he wrote or ported a wh bunch of cool door games, and a sweet web suite for sbbs, and can spell lose correctly.. he's got that going for him..

    Echicken pissed me off once, but I got over it.. most this crap is just in j man.. take it with a grain of salt.. I do.. except when somene calls me a th , I've worked hard to keep a honest disposition with everyone, even through active drug addiction, and when someone calls me a thief it really sets me o

    Otherwise.. life goes on.. and hopefully it can for you too..

    i will not even read your next post so dont bother to reply....

    He probably don't care, you're possible even posting to the wrong person aga so what does it matter.

    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)
    KK4QBN BBS


    well i dont know what he did or said but i would never attack someones past addicions or problems in that way.... i at least have that going for me...

    i am sorry about what you went through...


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Welcome to METALLIC DREAMS!! - bbs.metallic-dreams.com
  • From cybergod@VERT/METALLIC to KK4QBN on Wed Jan 11 13:15:00 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: KK4QBN to cybergod on Tue Jan 10 2017 08:19 am

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to Ralph Smole on Tue Jan 10 2017 12:48 am

    Y'all need to GROW THE FUCK UP! I've seen more intelligent
    conversations between 3 year old kids. UNBELIEVABLE.



    y'all is not and has never been a word....

    BLASPHEMY!


    Ralph is from Texas... I'm from GA, Y'all is a word in both these states and probably more states in the US then it IS'NT a word.. and I'm sure, wherever you're from you have a few slang words flying around that we woul have no id wtf you're even talking about.. well maybe we would because Us folks that us the word Ya'll are quite intelligeble and can understand them big words.. an cipherin too..



    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)
    KK4QBN BBS




    yes i was joking.... i have said y'all a few times in my life and im from NY


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Welcome to METALLIC DREAMS!! - bbs.metallic-dreams.com
  • From cybergod@VERT/METALLIC to tfurrows on Wed Jan 11 13:16:00 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: tfurrows to cybergod on Tue Jan 10 2017 11:50 am

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to Ralph Smole on Tue Jan 10 2017 12:48 am

    y'all is not and has never been a word....

    Well, you know, since there's an apostraphe in there, the author isn't using as "a word," they're using it as a contraction of two words. It's a commonly used one that most Americans will understand and have context for immediatel though I'm not sure the same could be said for a more global audience. Still think it's pretty easy to understand.

    Correct me if I'm wrong, this system may be a "dictionary words only" zone, it seems like in a topic as broad and stupid as this one has been, anything goes. I'm more bothered by the lower-case "i" that I keep seeing...



    yes it was a joke.... :-)


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Welcome to METALLIC DREAMS!! - bbs.metallic-dreams.com
  • From cybergod@VERT/METALLIC to Ralph Smole on Wed Jan 11 13:20:00 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Ralph Smole to cybergod on Tue Jan 10 2017 09:04 pm

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to Ralph Smole on Tue Jan 10 2017 12:48 am

    y'all is not and has never been a word....
    DId I offend your feeble mind? I hope so.


    i was joking buddy.... i have used y'all a few times in my life....


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Welcome to METALLIC DREAMS!! - bbs.metallic-dreams.com
  • From KK4QBN@VERT/KK4QBN to cybergod on Thu Jan 12 04:28:16 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to KK4QBN on Wed Jan 11 2017 01:14 pm

    well i dont know what he did or said but i would never attack someones past addicions or problems in that way.... i at least have that going for me...

    Thats cool, shows you have character. which very few people lack these days.

    i am sorry about what you went through...

    I need no apology from anyone, I am a product of my own actions, and I'm a stronger person for it. The perptrator of this event speaks as if he has had some new found religion lately, so his actions are between him and God, I've apologized to everyone for my part in this thread, even though I was defending myself, I stepped out of bounds by name-calling and pretty much acting a fool.

    I'm over it all now, I just wanted to get my REAL history out there, not something someone else has fabricated.

    BTW - I don't want to sound anymore childish, or whatever, but this thread has been such a clusterfuk that I believe you still have no idea who, or what you're replying about. You did get my part of the deal correct, But I have never had any adverse interactions with you personally.. that was someone else :-)

    Everyone have a great week Humpday is over, couple more days left in the workweek, if the weather holds up, I'm taking my Glider, a Warbird, and a cusom built hexacopter and throwing them off Fort Mountain over the weekend. Hopefully I will have video to follow. If anyone wants to check out some of my flight video lookup KK4QBN on Youtube.

    73 & lets get high.. (aircraft that is)

    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)
    KK4QBN BBS

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA US
  • From KK4QBN@VERT/KK4QBN to cybergod on Thu Jan 12 04:30:09 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to KK4QBN on Wed Jan 11 2017 01:15 pm

    yes i was joking.... i have said y'all a few times in my life and im from NY

    I too was speaking in Jest.. Good deal, we have some positive vibes floating around.. Must be all the cool code the SBBS developers have been chunking out at lightening speed here lately.

    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)
    KK4QBN BBS

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN BBS - (706)422-9538 - kk4qbn.synchro.net, Chatsworth GA US
  • From Ralph Smole@VERT/NIMBUS to cybergod on Thu Jan 12 20:53:25 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to Ralph Smole on Wed Jan 11 2017 01:20 pm

    DId I offend your feeble mind? I hope so.


    i was joking buddy.... i have used y'all a few times in my life....
    No problem :-)

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Nimbus BBS - nimbus.synchro.net
  • From Bbsing@VERT/GAMES to Mro on Fri Jan 13 09:37:00 2017
    Mro wrote to cybergod <=-

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to Mro on Tue Jan 10 2017 12:47 am

    so now.... lets see how long it take you to send me another bullet point.

    +
    looser....


    looser than what?


    im not sure what that dumb comment about a police report was about.... let me know if it was a threat so i can laugh....

    wait... never mind..... i dont care.....



    if you didnt care you wouldnt be replying, faggot.
    ^^^^^^^^^
    cigarette
    hahahahaha
    dont bother replying i wond read any further posts from you...


    YES YOU WILL.

    and if arguments are your form of conversation you should stop talking to everyone else too...

    SORRY, cyberdouche. been here before you and i will be here long after
    you are gone.
    ---
    = Synchronet = ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

    ... ...::comptech power up::... :)bbsing(:
    --- MultiMail/Linux v0.49
    þ Synchronet þ My Brand-New BBS
  • From Mro@VERT/BBSESINF to Bbsing on Fri Jan 13 17:37:38 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Bbsing to Mro on Fri Jan 13 2017 09:37 am

    hahahahaha


    your bbs tag line is still wrong and your name is still bbsing. do you mean for it to be bbsing?
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Sharkiepaw@VERT/NET247 to Ralph Smole on Thu Mar 9 02:01:34 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Ralph Smole to cybergod on Tue Jan 03 2017 09:33 pm

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: cybergod to echicken on Mon Jan 02 2017 02:11 pm

    Y'all need to GROW THE FUCK UP! I've seen more intelligent conversations between 3 year old kids. UNBELIEVABLE.

    Thanks for saying that you and me have the same mindset i am sick of seeing this crap when i look for new stuf to read on here



    Kai :3

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ NET247 - bbs.net247.com.au
  • From KK4QBN@VERT/KK4QBN to Sharkiepaw on Wed Mar 8 14:44:22 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Sharkiepaw to Ralph Smole on Thu Mar 09 2017 02:01 am

    Y'all need to GROW THE FUCK UP! I've seen more intelligent
    conversations between 3 year old kids. UNBELIEVABLE.

    Thanks for saying that you and me have the same mindset i am sick of seeing this crap when i look for new stuf to read on here

    Please don't feed the trolls.. they grow larger..

    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)
    KK4QBN BBS

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN + (706)-422-9538 + kk4qbn.synchro.net + 24/7/365
  • From Mro@VERT/BBSESINF to Sharkiepaw on Wed Mar 8 19:05:36 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Sharkiepaw to Ralph Smole on Thu Mar 09 2017 02:01 am

    Thanks for saying that you and me have the same mindset i am sick of seeing this crap when i look for new stuf to read on here

    you're replying to a post from january so it's not new stuff.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Sharkiepaw@VERT/NET247 to KK4QBN on Thu Mar 9 19:06:33 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: KK4QBN to Sharkiepaw on Wed Mar 08 2017 02:44 pm

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Sharkiepaw to Ralph Smole on Thu Mar 09 2017 02:01 am

    Y'all need to GROW THE FUCK UP! I've seen more intelligent
    conversations between 3 year old kids. UNBELIEVABLE.

    Thanks for saying that you and me have the same mindset i am sick of seeing this crap when i look for new stuf to read on here

    Please don't feed the trolls.. they grow larger..

    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)
    KK4QBN BBS

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN + (706)-422-9538 + kk4qbn.synchro.net + 24/7/365
    Opps sorry abaout that but he's right im sick of seeing crap stuff like this should be on the likes of facebook etc


    Kai :3

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ NET247 - bbs.net247.com.au
  • From Sharkiepaw@VERT/NET247 to Mro on Thu Mar 9 19:10:20 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Mro to Sharkiepaw on Wed Mar 08 2017 07:05 pm

    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Sharkiepaw to Ralph Smole on Thu Mar 09 2017 02:01 am

    Thanks for saying that you and me have the same mindset i am sick of seei this crap when i look for new stuf to read on here

    you're replying to a post from january so it's not new stuff.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
    Thanks for the heads up but i log on ones in a blue moon so its new to me




    Kai :3

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ NET247 - bbs.net247.com.au
  • From KK4QBN@VERT/KK4QBN to Sharkiepaw on Thu Mar 9 11:08:30 2017
    Re: Fake moon landings, not.
    By: Sharkiepaw to KK4QBN on Thu Mar 09 2017 07:06 pm

    Please don't feed the trolls.. they grow larger..


    ---
    Opps sorry abaout that but he's right im sick of seeing crap stuff like this should be on the likes of facebook etc

    I was joking with you, I'm notorius for feeding trolls, I've stopped here lately though, much more peaceful and serene :)

    --

    Tim Smith (KK4QBN)
    KK4QBN BBS

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ KK4QBN + (706)-422-9538 + kk4qbn.synchro.net + 24/7/365