My first computer was a TRS-80 CoCo II. :-)
DARYL STOUT wrote to JIMMY ANDERSON <=-
My first computer was a TRS-80 CoCo II. :-)
My first one was a Radio Shack TRS-80 MC-10 Micro Color Computer. It
had 4K of memory, with a 32K expansion pack. All programs were loaded
and saved via cassette tape, and I used a 300 baud modem to connect to CompuServe, my first internet experience, although it was all text back then. See the bulletin on The Thunderbolt BBS for a history of my
computer experience, and all that has happened with the BBS since 1990.
Yeah - I did the cassette thing too. :-) Those were the days, huh?
Didn't have a modem on it, but I *DID* upgrade to a 5-1/4 FDD!
DARYL STOUT wrote to JIMMY ANDERSON <=-
Didn't have a modem on it, but I *DID* upgrade to a 5-1/4 FDD!
When I got a 14.4k modem, I thought I was "smokin'". <G>
JIMMY ANDERSON wrote to DARYL STOUT <=-
I had people say, "you can't get on the Internet with that
computer." That just made me try harder. LOL
When I got a 14.4k modem, I thought I was "smokin'". <G>
I had a hand me down 8088 dual floppy once. Bought a 14.4
internal modem for it. Worked like a charm for BBS's
and such, EXCEPT I would have to 'slow it down' to 9600
for uploads. Downloads were fine. :-)
SquigY0 wrote to JIMMY ANDERSON <=-
My first modem was an internal 14.4. However not knowing anything
about modems, I assumed it was a 2400, and would dial into Prodigy on their phone lines that were 2400s.
Then one day, somebody on a BBS pointed out that I was being clocked at 14.4 when I logged in (they had just gotten a 28.8 and told me I needed
to get with the times...maaaaaan). We had an argument for awhile
because I was sure they were wrong.
Then I dialed into the Prodigy 9600 lines (i don't think they had 14.4 yet...if ever) and was like "holy...I was wasting so much time dialing into the wrong number and waaaaaaaiting!"
:) I started out with a hand-me-down PC and hand-me-down equipment for a few N>years.. My first modem (in 1992) was a 2400 baud modem, which I got along wi N>my first PC, and I thought it was pretty exciting to dial into BBSes. I N>started running my own BBS in 1994.
I eventually got a 14.4k modem (another hand-me-down), and I seem to remember N>having to get a new I/O card for my PC with a 16550A UART to handle the faste N>modem (my old card had a 16450 UART). I thought 14.4k was pretty speedy.. A N>then later, I got a 33.6k (I think I skipped 28.8k), and then a 56k after I N>started using the internet..
One of the bulletins on my BBS details its history...30 years running...starting with my experience with BBS's, then running one on
the TRS-80 Model 100 laptop (the programs for it are still in my files area), and then with PC's...from DOS 3.2 to 5, to 6, to 6.22; with DESQView and QEMM...to Windows 3.11 to 95, 98, XP, and now Windows 7... then with GT Power, Virtual Advanced, and Synchronet...as well as hardware, software, and other issues. It sure brings back
memories...both good and bad...all part of being a Sysop.
Nightfox wrote to Daryl Stout <=-
Yeah, it does.. For a little while in the 90s, I was using QEMM to run
a 2-node setup with RemoteAccess in MS-DOS. I only had one phone line
for my BBS, but I wanted to set up a second node so I could log in
locally while a user was logged into my BBS. I was also curious how a multi-node BBS setup worked in a DOS environment anyway.. I thought
QEMM actually worked fairly well. Years before, I remember seeing a product called DoubleDOS that was supposed to provide multi-tasking,
but I remember it not working very well.
QEMM/DesqView was the bees knees for DOS multitasking, until OS/2 came along.
OS/2 was the nest DOS multitasker of the lot. :)
... It is broke. It will not work. It does not go.
Jagossel wrote to Vk3jed <=-
QEMM/DesqView was the bees knees for DOS multitasking, until OS/2 came along
.
OS/2 was the nest DOS multitasker of the lot. :)
... It is broke. It will not work. It does not go.
Dude, ypur tagline was picked at the wrong time. :)
Then one day, somebody on a BBS pointed out that I was being clocked 14.4 when I logged in (they had just gotten a 28.8 and told me I need to get with the times...maaaaaan). We had an argument for awhile because I was sure they were wrong.You didn't notice the difference? :)
SquigY0 wrote to Vk3jed <=-
You didn't notice the difference? :)
I was green as green could be at the time. I just figured it was
faster cause it was all text-based, not graphics like Prodigy. Not to
mention that I wasn't even versed in the different ways the handshakes sounded.
Later, I couldn't wait to dial in to the boingdy boingdy BBSs and would laugh when I dailed into the EEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEE SSSSSSSH ones.
LOL yep. Well I started without even the SSSHHHH, just the EEEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeeeee (300 and 1200/75). I learned the other handshake sounds as I upgraded over the years. :)
SquigY0 wrote to Vk3jed <=-
@VIA: VERT/SHADOW9
LOL yep. Well I started without even the SSSHHHH, just the EEEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeeeee (300 and 1200/75). I learned the other handshake sounds as I upgraded over the years. :)
This is such an amazing exclusive language now that we are speaking :D
This is such an amazing exclusive language now that we are speaking :Haha, everyone else would think we're on some mind altering substance! :D
LOL yep. Well I started without even the SSSHHHH, just the EEEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeeeee (300 and 1200/75). I learned the other handshake sounds as I upgraded over the years. :)
This is such an amazing exclusive language now that we are speaking :D
Haha, everyone else would think we're on some mind altering substance! :D
SquigY0 wrote to Vk3jed <=-
@VIA: VERT/SHADOW9
This is such an amazing exclusive language now that we are speaking :Haha, everyone else would think we're on some mind altering substance! :D
BRB. Gotta get with my dealer to score some bauds.
Daryl Stout wrote to VK3JED <=-
Haha, everyone else would think we're on some mind altering substance! :D
Being a Sysop didn't affect me at all...at all...at all...at all. <G>
BTW, do you know your posts have no origin tagline? They look like they
A reboot should work wonders. :P
Haha, everyone else would think we're on some mind altering substance! :D
Being a Sysop didn't affect me at all...at all...at all...at all. <G>
*KICK*
A reboot should work wonders. :P
Daryl Stout wrote to VK3JED <=-
A reboot should work wonders. :P
So would *SLAP*!! <sprints away> :D
BTW, do you know your posts have no origin tagline? They look like they come from my system when they arrive here, I can only see that they're
not from here by the VIA line at the top. If you're the sysop, looks
like you need to tweak things a little. :)
Captain Obvious wrote to Vk3jed <=-
It's my system. Weirdest damn thing. I have an origin line in my base config but nothing shows up in the messages. I've even gone in and
changed it to something else just to make sure.
A reboot should work wonders. :P
So would *SLAP*!! <sprints away> :D
Haha, I don't like your chances against me! (what's your 100m time? ;) ).
A reboot should work wonders. :P
Man, I just remembered recently that back when I was running my WWIV board S>it would randomly go to the normal black screen with the blinking cursor S>waiting for a call after somebody logged off or network packets were received S>but wouldn't pick up the next call....until I changed the config to always ex S>the board after somebody logged off and after packets processed.
And the batch file referenced in the autoexec.bat would just loop around and S>call itself everytime it exited, exponentially increasing the board's uptime.
lock, so while the BBS was set to answer on ring #2, the answering
machine was set to pick up on ring #4, and when it did, it would reboot the computer, and reload the BBS.
Daryl Stout wrote to VK3JED <=-
Haha, I don't like your chances against me! (what's your 100m time? ;) ).
0 -- because it's not a ham radio band, and I don't have RF gear. <G>
Daryl Stout wrote to SQUIGY0 <=-
Years ago, when I ran GT Power under dial-up, a former Sysop rigged
up a relay switch on the answering machine. Sometimes, the system would lock, so while the BBS was set to answer on ring #2, the answering
machine was set to pick up on ring #4, and when it did, it would reboot the computer, and reload the BBS.
And the batch file referenced in the autoexec.bat would just loop around S>>and call itself everytime it exited, exponentially increasing the
board's uptime.
We had one of those answering machines that would pick up on the second ring if there were messages waiting to be picked up...i guess so you could save payphone money if you were calling and there was nothing to hear.
Hahaha, but how long does it take you to run 100m (you know, on your feet, nothing to do with radio)?
Clever watchdog timer. :) I never had many issues, it probably helped that all of the software "recycled" after each call. The mailer would exit and load the BBS, the BBS (RemoteAccess) exited after every caller. If it was a mail call, the mailer would exit and the tosser would load, and so on. The real magic happened in the batch file that ran the BBS. :)
Quoting Poindexter Fortran to Daryl Stout <=-
@VIA: VERT/REALITY
@MSGID: <59736B9E.18969.dove.dove-gen@realitycheckbbs.org>
@REPLY: <5972752A.1071.dove-general@wx1der.dyndns.org>
@TZ: c1e0
Re: Computer History
By: Daryl Stout to SQUIGY0 on Fri Jul 21 2017 04:32 pm
And the batch file referenced in the autoexec.bat would just loop around
and call itself everytime it exited, exponentially increasing the
board's uptime.
I originally ran FrontDoor with telegard in the dial-up days.
FrontDoor would play a little morse code SOS over the PC speaker when
it exited on an error.
I went to Santa Cruz for a training class for a week, and the modem
hung almost as soon as my bags left the house. The batch file took
about 90 seconds to error out trying to initialize the modem, then do
it's SOS, loop to the beginning, 90 seconds, SOS, loop to the
beginning... for a week. My neighbors must have loved it.
-!-
þ Synchronet þ realitycheckBBS -- http://realitycheckBBS.org
Poindexter Fortran wrote to Vk3jed <=-
Depends on how heavy the radio you're carrying is.
Poindexter Fortran wrote to Vk3jed <=-
mail call, the mailer would exit and the tosser would load, and so on. The real magic happened in the batch file that ran the BBS. :)
Is it sad that I miss those days? Getting a DOS PC to be able to accept mail calls, human callers, run maintenance and back itself up, using
batch files and a box that converts sound into a serial data stream
seems pretty amazing.
I originally ran FrontDoor with telegard in the dial-up days. FrontDoor woul PF>play a little morse code SOS over the PC speaker when it exited on an error.
I went to Santa Cruz for a training class for a week, and the modem hung alm PF>as soon as my bags left the house. The batch file took about 90 seconds to PF>error out trying to initialize the modem, then do it's SOS, loop to the PF>beginning, 90 seconds, SOS, loop to the beginning... for a week. My neighbor PF>must have loved it.
Hahaha, but how long does it take you to run 100m (you know, on your fee PF>Vk> nothing to do with radio)?
Depends on how heavy the radio you're carrying is.
Is it sad that I miss those days? Getting a DOS PC to be able to accept mail PF>calls, human callers, run maintenance and back itself up, using batch files PF>a box that converts sound into a serial data stream seems pretty amazing.
Daryl Stout wrote to POINDEXTER FORTRAN <=-
Depends on how heavy the radio you're carrying is.
And, some of the rigs nowadays are rather small.
Yes, there was something about those days. In some ways, I miss then, probably because being a sysop required a lot of skill in putting it all together. Sure, today's software is just awesome - Synchronet, Mystic, they have it all. I think it's the way you could make all those different pieces work together in a mix and match kind of way .
LOL yep. Well I started without even the SSSHHHH, just the EEEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeeeee (300 and 1200/75). I learned the other handshake sounds as I upgraded over the years. :)This is such an amazing exclusive language now that we are speaking :D
a relay switch on the answering machine. Sometimes, the system would
lock, so while the BBS was set to answer on ring #2, the answering
machine was set to pick up on ring #4, and when it did, it would reboot
the computer, and reload the BBS.
Poindexter Fortran wrote to Vk3jed <=-
I still have to get Allfix and Radius FTN mailer to play nice --
Synchronet has a new mailer and TIC processor, but don't think they're
up to supporting a hub yet. I run most of my events through Radius'
Darkwing wrote to SquigY0 <=-
I can connect 300 with my voice, 1200 is tough to keep it from disconnecting hehe... Now if you could control what characters are demodulated from that stream, you win.
I can connect 300 with my voice, 1200 is tough to keep it from
a relay switch on the answering machine. Sometimes, the system would
lock, so while the BBS was set to answer on ring #2, the answering
machine was set to pick up on ring #4, and when it did, it would reboot the computer, and reload the BBS.
Better hope your BBS never gets that popular with one of those, otherwis
it could keep rebootin' for a long time... Oh wait it's not 1990 anymore =)
Daryl Stout wrote to DARKWING <=-
The way Windows 7 is, I have to enter a password to get into it at
logon (I prefer it that way). Then, I have run several items as Administrator...Synchronet gets loaded last.
The way Windows 7 is, I have to enter a password to get into it at
logon (I prefer it that way). Then, I have run several items as Administrator...Synchronet gets loaded last.
VK3JED wrote to JIMMY ANDERSON <=-
I had people say, "you can't get on the Internet with that
computer." That just made me try harder. LOL
Would have worked fine with a shell account. PPP based access would
have been possible with a number of packages too.
SQUIGY0 wrote to JIMMY ANDERSON <=-
My first modem was an internal 14.4. However not knowing anything
about modems, I assumed it was a 2400, and would dial into Prodigy on their phone lines that were 2400s.
Then one day, somebody on a BBS pointed out that I was being clocked at 14.4 when I logged in (they had just gotten a 28.8 and told me I needed
to get with the times...maaaaaan). We had an argument for awhile
because I was sure they were wrong.
Then I dialed into the Prodigy 9600 lines (i don't think they had 14.4 yet...if ever) and was like "holy...I was wasting so much time dialing into the wrong number and waaaaaaaiting!"
JIMMY ANDERSON wrote to VK3JED <=-
Yeah - it served me well for a long time! Then I went to a
Windows 3.1 system and started using Trumphet software - then
AOL. :-)
I used a shell account for the first year or so, then went PPP, accessing the net using a mixture of WFWG (the DOS/Windows machine was on a LAN), OS/2 Warp 3 and Windows NT 4. :) The actual Internet connection was made using a Linux box, and I had a /29 of public IPs routed to the LAN. :)
poindexter FORTRAN wrote to Vk3jed <=-
Those early days were fun. I worked at a software company from 1992 to 1995, and we had a 56K leased line to UC Berkeley and to the internet.
We used a Cisco router, Kalpana 5-port Ethernet switch, and hubs - each department had their own switched collision domain. Big stuff back
then.
I moved us from a LAN-based email system called QuickMail to a BSD box running a POP/NNTP server and SMTP, and we set up a small WfW workgroup for our tech support guys along with a couple of IP apps.
The amount of change we implemented in a short time was pretty amazing.
Same here, they were heady days, I have fond memories of them.
poindexter FORTRAN wrote to Vk3jed <=-
It's always fun doing things for the first time. We did all of our DNS through a Sun 3/60 system on loan from UC Berkeley. When they "wanted
it back" (read: the team that borrowed it and set up services on it
wanted it for their application) we had a short period of time to move
all the services off of it.
I started on a Saturday morning with a CD copy of BSD/OS, a copy of Cricket Liu's DNS and BIND book, the Sendmail book and a pot of coffee. Read the book from start to finish and had DNS working for an external domain, internal domain and email forwarding by 3:00pm. It was amazing seeing it all working, considering I had no idea how it all worked at 8:00am that day.
LOL yep, like the time a friend rocked up with a 486DX2/66 and a Linux CD, and asked if I could turn that into a dialin server, after his attempts had been unsuccessful. :)
poindexter FORTRAN wrote to Vk3jed <=-
Amazing what worked back then. I worked for a company that did video games, and we had one 486 running Linux that handled DNS, and a Sun
Ultra 2 that ran a Netscape web server and FTP server. That combination handled something like 500 concurrent web and FTP users when we
released a well-anticipated game.
Yes, a well tuned Linux box back then could handle quite a load. :) But web pages back then were often static and not served up from a SQL database, as is often the case today (think modern CMS).
poindexter FORTRAN wrote to Vk3jed <=-
Yeah, we handled a tiny bit of JSP back then, but most of the pages
were created by a web company that I don't want to think of how much
they charged per page...
| Sysop: | Ragnarok |
|---|---|
| Location: | Dock Sud, Bs As, Argentina |
| Users: | 137 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 92:41:12 |
| Calls: | 15,362 |
| Files: | 20,057 |
| D/L today: |
9 files (1,087K bytes) |
| Messages: | 1,797,487 |