In a message dated 07-23-17, Darkwing said to Mro:
DARKWING> SL sounded like fun, so I logged in and... Yeah, just a bunch of DARKWING>furries in a virtual environment with bad graphics. Umm, nah.
And your point is?
Robert Wolfe
DARKWING> SL sounded like fun, so I logged in and... Yeah, just a bunch of DARKWING>furries in a virtual environment with bad graphics. Umm, nah.
And your point is?
furries are generally looked at as sick perverted freaks.
furries are generally looked at as sick perverted freaks.
Not all of us are.
DARKWING> SL sounded like fun, so I logged in and... Yeah, just a bu of DARKWING>furries in a virtual environment with bad graphics. Umm, nah And your point is?Not all of us are.
furries are generally looked at as sick perverted freaks.
KK4QBN wrote to Robert Wolfe <=-
If it is'nt excuse me for my ignorance.. and to each their own, it
truly is'nt my business.. I truly seek enlightenment :)
If it is'nt excuse me for my ignorance.. and to each their own, it
truly is'nt my business.. I truly seek enlightenment :)
I did watch a doco about the furry movement. Not my cup of tea, but each to their own, as long as no one is being harmed or being forced to do anything without consent.
Re-editing my message - the tagline was randomply picked! :D
furries are generally looked at as sick perverted freaks.
Not all of us are.
Is'nt that like the whole idea behind the "Furry" movement..?
If it is'nt excuse me for my ignorance.. and to each their own, it truly is'nt
my business.. I truly seek enlightenment :)
My only point was that it was not what I expected at all. I was looking
f
or something more like world of warcrack, or even lambdamoo ->(lambda.moo.mud.org
:8888). I never got past the group hanging out at the zone-in location, so ->may
be there's more to it. It wasn't a slam on anyone's preferences though.
KK4QBN wrote to Vk3jed <=-
I did watch a doco about the furry movement. Not my cup of tea, but each to their own, as long as no one is being harmed or being forced to do anything without consent.
Agreed!
Re-editing my message - the tagline was randomply picked! :D
ROFLMAO! I believe that would be a whole different fetish.. but furry
does fit the bill :)
"Furry" means something different to everyone. Yes, there are those furries that give our culture a bad name, just like there is in other subcultures/cultures. Rest assured, I am not one of the "bad" furries.
KK4QBN wrote to Robert Wolfe <=-
If it is'nt excuse me for my ignorance.. and to each their own, it truly is'nt my business.. I truly seek enlightenment :)
"Furry" means something different to everyone. Yes, there are those furries that give our culture a bad name, just like there is in other subcultures/cultures. Rest assured, I am not one of the "bad" furries.
Yep, I don't see why we should be forcing our values on everyone else. The Religious Right(Wrong) do that all the time, they can go and piss off, as far as I'm concerned.
I'm confused. Is it a sex thing or isn't it? I'm cool with it either way, to each their own, but if we're splitting the world up into Good Furries and Bad Furries let's really go with this.
i saw a video of a furry finding some children and trying to entertain them. looked like a pedophile and those are better off dead.
i usually dont care what other people do but i think furries need mental
jesus was black
Mro wrote to Vk3jed <=-
jesus was black
I'm confused. Is it a sex thing or isn't it? I'm cool with it
either way, to each their own, but if we're splitting the world up
into Good Furries and Bad Furries let's really go with this.
For some people, yes, it is a sex thing. And it's those that give the whole subculture a bad name. For a lot of people though, it can go as
far as being a "spiritual" thing -- a way for them to get into a closer fellowship with their "totem," "spirit guide," etc. (I've a little American Indian blood in me, so this is where I approach the whole furry thing.)
jesus was black
i usually dont care what other people do but i think furries need mental help. ---
If it's not too personal a question, what kind of *perfectly normal*, *not weird at all* sex stuff are *you* into?
For some people, yes, it is a sex thing. And it's those that give the
whole subculture a bad name. For a lot of people though, it can go as
far as being a "spiritual" thing -- a way for them to get into a closer fellowship with their "totem," "spirit guide," etc. (I've a little
American Indian blood in me, so this is where I approach the whole furry thing.)
Leregard wrote to Mro <=-
Note: This is a trick question. All sex stuff is weird, there is no normal sex stuff, it's wired into your brain WAY lower in than the part that makes things seem normal. It doesn't care about normal at all.
It's about as human as a hurricane.
Re: Re: ARGUMENTS AND INSULTS
By: Mro to Vk3jed on Wed Aug 02 2017 04:47 pm
i usually dont care what other people do but i think furries need mental help. ---
If it's not too personal a question, what kind of *perfectly normal*, *not weird at all* sex stuff are *you* into?
If it's not too personal a question, what kind of *perfectly normal*, *not weird at all* sex stuff are *you* into?
Note: This is a trick question. All sex stuff is weird, there is no normal sex stuff, it's wired into your brain WAY lower in than the part that makes things seem normal. It doesn't care about normal at all. It's about as human as a hurricane.
If it's not too personal a question, what kind of *perfectly
normal*, *not weird at all* sex stuff are *you* into?
Note: This is a trick question. All sex stuff is weird, there is no
normal sex stuff, it's wired into your brain WAY lower in than the
part that makes things seem normal. It doesn't care about normal at
all. It's about as human as a hurricane.
i know it was a trick question but i answered it well, didnt i?
... and do the good furries and bad furries do battle?
i know it was a trick question but i answered it well, didnt i?
well, i dont hurt anybody or anything and i dont do anything with animals or anything that is illegal. what i do is something nobody would be ashamed of.
... and do the good furries and bad furries do battle?
They do, but are limited to 20 Furry Fights per day, after which they must rest and restore hit points. Reset is at midnight, UTC-0500...
Re: Re: ARGUMENTS AND INSULTS
By: Mro to Leregard on Thu Aug 03 2017 10:33 pm
i know it was a trick question but i answered it well, didnt i?
No. Your answer was basically "my ego is the standard for everything"
MRO wrote to VK3JED <=-
KK4QBN wrote to Robert Wolfe <=-
If it is'nt excuse me for my ignorance.. and to each their own, it truly is'nt my business.. I truly seek enlightenment :)
i saw a video of a furry finding some children and trying to entertain them. looked like a pedophile and those are better off dead.
i usually dont care what other people do but i think furries need
mental help. ---
Robert Wolfe wrote to LEREGARD <=-
I'm confused. Is it a sex thing or isn't it? I'm cool with it
either way, to each their own, but if we're splitting the world up
into Good Furries and Bad Furries let's really go with this.
For some people, yes, it is a sex thing. And it's those that give the whole subculture a bad name. For a lot of people though, it can go as
far as being a "spiritual" thing -- a way for them to get into a closer fellowship with their "totem," "spirit guide," etc. (I've a little American Indian blood in me, so this is where I approach the whole
furry thing.)
For some people, yes, it is a sex thing. And it's those that give the whole subculture a bad name. For a lot of people though, it can go as far as being a "spiritual" thing -- a way for them to get into a closer fellowship with their "totem," "spirit guide," etc. (I've a little American Indian blood in me, so this is where I approach the whole
furry thing.)
I just started (finally) watching Star Trek Voyager over the weekend,
and the whole Indian "spirit guide" thing was featured. VERY cool!
And thanks for saying Indian and not Native American. That PC crap
really gets me, especially since my paternal grandmother was
Cherokee and we NEVER were offended by the word.
And thanks for saying Indian and not Native American. That PC crap
really gets me, especially since my paternal grandmother was
Cherokee and we NEVER were offended by the word.
I just started (finally) watching Star Trek Voyager over the weekend,
and the whole Indian "spirit guide" thing was featured. VERY cool!
Yeah, I thought it was, too. Then again, what Trek episode ISN'T cool? :)
Re: RE:ARGUMENTS AND INSULTS
By: JIMMY ANDERSON to Robert Wolfe on Mon Aug 07 2017 10:44 am
And thanks for saying Indian and not Native American. That PC crap really gets me, especially since my paternal grandmother was
Cherokee and we NEVER were offended by the word.
Technically, "Indian" means from India.. I believe the reason that word was
Robert Wolfe wrote to JIMMY ANDERSON <=-
And thanks for saying Indian and not Native American. That PC crap
really gets me, especially since my paternal grandmother was
Cherokee and we NEVER were offended by the word.
Understand. I've got Choctaw Indian in my blood plus I went to school
and had a friend that was full-blooded Choctaw Indian.
Nightfox wrote to JIMMY ANDERSON <=-
I tend to think of India when I hear "Indian".. But I do work with
some people from India..
I know people that enjoy wearing 'ears' and such as accesories. I don't think they need 'help.' For that matter my wife bought a set of ears
and a clip on tail at Gencon a few years ago. LOTS of cosplayers there
and that was her way to dip her toe, so to speak.
I tend to think of India when I hear "Indian".. But I do work with
some people from India..
I sometimes have to ask for clarification, because in Australia, most people nowadays mean someone from India, when they say "Indian", "Native American" eliminates that confusion. We have a lot of people of Indian (as in from India) descent here, some are immigrants, some are Indian students on a student visa, so if you say "indian" here, it's assumed you're talking about South Asian people. :)
I just started (finally) watching Star Trek Voyager over the weekend,
and the whole Indian "spirit guide" thing was featured. VERY cool!
And thanks for saying Indian and not Native American. That PC crap
really gets me, especially since my paternal grandmother was
Cherokee and we NEVER were offended by the word.
I sometimes have to ask for clarification, because in Australia, most people nowadays mean someone from India, when they say "Indian", "Native American" eliminates that confusion. We have a lot of people of Indian (as in from India) descent here, some are immigrants, some are Indian students on a student visa, so if you say "indian" here, it's assumed you're talking about South Asian people. :)
due.. my neice used to be the mose beautiful, child, teenager growing up.. she got into here rebellious stage late.. and since she is a Millenial, she thinks she is some sor t of pokemon.. She wears fraky contacts ALL TJE TIME. A long with ears and other weird sh8t.. and this is on normal days when she is workign at verizon.. you should see her when she dresses for a convention.. I swear, I believe those japanese anime cartoons brainwashed people as children.
Mro wrote to Vk3jed <=-
"native americans" DID come from asia.
And thanks for saying Indian and not Native American. That PC crap
really gets me, especially since my paternal grandmother was
Cherokee and we NEVER were offended by the word.
i say american indian.
I sometimes have to ask for clarification, because in Australia, most people nowadays mean someone from India, when they say "Indian", "Native American" eliminates that confusion. We have a lot of people of Indian (as in from India) descent here, some are immigrants, some are Indian students on a student visa, so if you say "indian" here, it's assumed you're talking about South Asian people. :)
"native americans" DID come from asia.
Well, by that logic, we're all Africans. ;)
Mro wrote to Vk3jed <=-
"native americans" DID come from asia.
Well, by that logic, we're all Africans. ;)
KK4QBN wrote to Vk3jed <=-
We have a lot of "Real Indian" people here too I'm talking most of the phone book either has he name "Smith" a Hispanic name, or the Name
"Patel" and I live about 10 miles north of New Echota, the Capital of
the Cherokee Nation.. Lickily, we still don't get mixed up that much..
I prefer to call Cherokee's, etc, Natives. but as I said, My
Grandmother preferred to be called Indians for some reason.
KK4QBN wrote to Vk3jed <=-
Logic no longer exists.. but yes.. if we did'nt come on the floating wood.. we crossed the land bridge.. I still believe we were all seeded
and God is a Goul'd. J/K
So you have a significant Indian population too. Well, we do need to respect what people want to call themselves, but at least "American Indians" would minimise the confusion. :)
Bloody snakeheads. :D
KK4QBN wrote to Vk3jed <=-
This is why at times, I laugh at ignorant black people who say that
WHITE people are all Slave driving devils.
I know we need to remember our past or we are doomed to repeat.. BUT we
do not need to keep living in the past.
KK4QBN wrote to Vk3jed <=-
Bloody snakeheads. :D
Lol..
No, actual Indians or "Hindu".. There are a lot of Natives that live about an hour away from me in Cherokee, but I live in what USED to be the Cherokee
And thanks for saying Indian and not Native American. That PC crap
really gets me, especially since my paternal grandmother was
Cherokee and we NEVER were offended by the word.
Re: RE:ARGUMENTS AND INSULTS
By: JIMMY ANDERSON to Robert Wolfe on Mon Aug 07 2017 10:44 am
And thanks for saying Indian and not Native American. That PC crap really gets me, especially since my paternal grandmother was
Cherokee and we NEVER were offended by the word.
The way I hear it (and I live in a town that's located between two Indian reservations, so I have my sources), it doesn't matter which one you use, because both names were given to them by the white man. I hear what you're saying, though. You say "Native American" and you sound like a geek.
they only want to be referred to as their tribe name. aint nobody got time for that so i just call them american indians.
Re: RE:ARGUMENTS AND INSULTS
By: MRO to Toadster on Sat Jul 28 2018 08:50 pm
they only want to be referred to as their tribe name. aint nobody got time for that so i just call them american indians.
This is getting quite confusing for me, really. I'll have to ask someone.
And thanks for saying Indian and not Native American. That PC crap
really gets me, especially since my paternal grandmother was
Cherokee and we NEVER were offended by the word.
saying, though. You say "Native American" and you sound like a geek.
But they aren't from India. They really are native American.. The reason
they didnt start in america. they walked there over the ice bridge in what we call alaska.
But they aren't from India. They really are native American.. The
reason
they didnt start in america. they walked there over the ice bridge in what we call alaska.
maybe they DID come from what we now call india! AH HAH!
they didnt start in america. they walked there over the ice bridge
in what we call alaska.
Actually, I heard somewhere that archaeologists had discovered a prehistoric Indian/Native American (whatever) village that was 10,000 years older than the Egyptian pyramids. It completely blows that theory, because all the history books say that the ice bridge thing happened about 20,000 years ago. And the pyramids are at least a few thousand years old... I'm gonna have to look this up.
Re: RE:ARGUMENTS AND INSULTS
By: MRO to Nightfox on Sun Jul 29 2018 09:28 pm
But they aren't from India. They really are native American.. The
reason
they didnt start in america. they walked there over the ice bridge in what we call alaska.
maybe they DID come from what we now call india! AH HAH!
I've heard they may have come from China.
Re: RE:ARGUMENTS AND INSULTS
By: Toadster to MRO on Mon Jul 30 2018 07:20 pm
they didnt start in america. they walked there over the ice bridge
in what we call alaska.
Actually, I heard somewhere that archaeologists had discovered a prehistoric Indian/Native American (whatever) village that was 10,000 years older than the Egyptian pyramids. It completely blows that theory, because all the history books say that the ice bridge thing happened about 20,000 years ago. And the pyramids are at least a few thousand years old... I'm gonna have to look this up.
Perhaps there was an old civilization in the Americas that was displaced by the Asian people who walked over on the ice bridge. I seem to recall hearing that may be an actual theory.. Not sure though.
But they aren't from India. They really are native American.. The
reason
they didnt start in america. they walked there over the ice bridge in w we call alaska.
maybe they DID come from what we now call india! AH HAH!
I've heard they may have come from China.
But they aren't from India. They really are native American.. The reason they were called Indians was probably because Chris Columbis intended to sail to India. I don't think it's really politically correct, it's just more accurate to call them Native American.
scientists only pretend to know most things, then change their minds decades later. they could have came from a whale's asshole for all we know
Re: RE:ARGUMENTS AND INSULTS
By: Nightfox to JIMMY ANDERSON on Sun Jul 29 2018 05:23 pm
But they aren't from India. They really are native American.. The reason they were called Indians was probably because Chris Columbis intended to sail to India. I don't think it's really politically correct, it's just more accurate to call them Native American.
Now here's an interesting little historical factoid for you: Columbus actually went his whole life thinking he had landed in India. So I guess the name
stuck.
Re: RE:ARGUMENTS AND INSULTS
By: MRO to Nightfox on Mon Jul 30 2018 09:33 pm
scientists only pretend to know most things, then change their minds decades later. they could have came from a whale's asshole for all we know
Scientists go with what the research says. They aren't pretending, just going on the best evidence from the research.
i dont think that's true. india wasnt an undiscovered country; they were just trying to find a western path to india.
he went to the new world 4 times and discovered a lot of islands and the gulf of mexico and and south american main lands.
Re: RE:ARGUMENTS AND INSULTS
By: MRO to Toadster on Tue Jul 31 2018 09:14 pm
i dont think that's true. india wasnt an undiscovered country; they were just trying to find a western path to india.
he went to the new world 4 times and discovered a lot of islands and the gulf of mexico and and south american main lands.
That ain't the way I heared it, Johnny. :) The way I heared it, he never
columbus reached what they called the new world on oct 12,1492
he was just trying to find a western route to india. he misjudged how large the planet was.
Granted, history is taught primarily from the white man's point of view, and like I said, I live in a town that's located between two Indian reservations (but not directly on one), and so I have heard many different versions of events. I'm not quite sure what to believe anymore, and quite frankly, I don't want to be Mr. Know-It-All anymore.
Re: RE:ARGUMENTS AND INSULTS
By: MRO to Toadster on Wed Aug 01 2018 04:50 pm
columbus reached what they called the new world on oct 12,1492
Well, that's one of the first things they teach you in history class. :)
MRO wrote to Nightfox <=-
Re: RE:ARGUMENTS AND INSULTS
By: Nightfox to MRO on Mon Jul 30 2018 07:00 pm
Re: RE:ARGUMENTS AND INSULTS
By: MRO to Nightfox on Sun Jul 29 2018 09:28 pm
But they aren't from India. They really are native American.. The
reason
they didnt start in america. they walked there over the ice bridge in what we call alaska.
maybe they DID come from what we now call india! AH HAH!
I've heard they may have come from China.
scientists only pretend to know most things, then change their minds decades later. they could have came from a whale's asshole for all
we know ---
scientists only pretend to know most things, then change their minds decades later. they could have came from a whale's asshole for all
we know ---
Kinda like the last sentence above... ;-)
Sorry, Couldn't resist the joke, nothing personal...
TOADSTER wrote to JIMMY ANDERSON <=-
And thanks for saying Indian and not Native American. That PC crap
really gets me, especially since my paternal grandmother was
Cherokee and we NEVER were offended by the word.
The way I hear it (and I live in a town that's located between two
Indian reservations, so I have my sources), it doesn't matter which one you use, because both names were given to them by the white man.
I hear
what you're saying, though. You say "Native American" and you sound
like a geek.
NIGHTFOX wrote to JIMMY ANDERSON <=-
And thanks for saying Indian and not Native American. That PC crap
really gets me, especially since my paternal grandmother was
Cherokee and we NEVER were offended by the word.
But they aren't from India. They really are native American.. The
reason they were called Indians was probably because Chris Columbis intended to sail to India. I don't think it's really politically
correct, it's just more accurate to call them Native American.
NIGHTFOX wrote to TOADSTER <=-
By: Toadster to JIMMY ANDERSON on Sat Jul 28 2018 06:17 pm
saying, though. You say "Native American" and you sound like a geek.
I've never thought of that term sounding geeky.. Maybe I'm just used
to people saying "Native American". I actually haven't heard people
call them Indians or American Indian in a while.. Maybe it's because I know people who are actually from India, but when I hear "Indian", I
think of someone from India..
TOADSTER wrote to MRO <=-
they didnt start in america. they walked there over the ice bridge in what we call alaska.
Actually, I heard somewhere that archaeologists had discovered a prehistoric Indian/Native American (whatever) village that was 10,000 years older than the Egyptian pyramids. It completely blows that
theory, because all the history books say that the ice bridge thing happened about 20,000 years ago. And the pyramids are at least a few thousand years old... I'm gonna have to look this up.
MRO wrote to Ray Quinn <=-
what i know is based on experience. i never make up things. i got by
what i've seen. if i am taught or told something by 'experts' and
these things are frequently reversed or just exposed as being total
madeup bullshit, i'm going to be skeptical.
| Sysop: | Ragnarok |
|---|---|
| Location: | Dock Sud, Bs As, Argentina |
| Users: | 136 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 07:00:18 |
| Calls: | 15,171 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 19,857 |
| D/L today: |
9 files (848K bytes) |
| Messages: | 1,691,402 |