So I'm trying out SeaMonkey again and I must say, I really like it. It has a built-in website creator (page editor to be more correct), IRC client, mail, news and not to forget a web browser.
For some reason I thought SeaMonkey wasn't being developed anymore, but I guess it still is. I remember when Netscape was a similar application suite with the browser bundled along with a web page editor, email client, IRC, etc.. These days, I tend to use separate software for that stuff (and I rarely even use dedicated email software anymore, as I tend to use web mail).
So I'm trying out SeaMonkey again and I must say, I really like it. It has a built-in website creator (page editor to be more correct), IRC client, mail, news and not to forget a web browser.
Roadhog wrote to Deavmi <=-
So I'm trying out SeaMonkey again and I must say, I really like it. It
has a built-in website creator (page editor to be more correct), IRC client, mail, news and not to forget a web browser.
I have used it as a webpage editor, It's decent.
I still have some old fashioned HTML pages kicking around. I've been using Notepad to edit them of late, but a decent WYSIWYG editor would be handy at times. Might install Seamonkey and see how it goes. I think I tried it years ago and it was quite good, from memory.
ingI still have some old fashioned HTML pages kicking around. I've been us
yNotepad to edit them of late, but a decent WYSIWYG editor would be hand
itat times. Might install Seamonkey and see how it goes. I think I tried
h ayears ago and it was quite good, from memory.
I noticed that WYSIWYG HTML editors tend to produce bloated HTML (though perhaps they've gotten better over time). I tend to prefer to edit HTML wit
simple text editor (like Notepad and such), but I could understand why some would want to use a WYSIWIG editor for more complex pages & sites.
Nightfox wrote to Vk3jed <=-
I noticed that WYSIWYG HTML editors tend to produce bloated HTML
(though perhaps they've gotten better over time). I tend to prefer to edit HTML with a simple text editor (like Notepad and such), but I
could understand why some would want to use a WYSIWIG editor for more complex pages & sites.
I still have some old fashioned HTML pages kicking around. I've been using Notepad to edit them of late, but a decent WYSIWYG editor would be handy at times. Might install Seamonkey and see how it goes. I think I tried it years ago and it was quite good, from memory.
poindexter FORTRAN wrote to Vk3jed <=-
I used to use Allaire Homesite -- Macromedia bought them and disabled
the best features -- why buy $49 Homesite when $299 Dreamweaver did all that and more?
There's a program called Komposer that's pretty good for quickie HTML; it's open source and based on a KDE program, so it's available for
Linux, too.
There's a program called Komposer that's pretty good for quickie HTML; it's open source and based on a KDE program, so it's available for Linux, too. [0m
Don't know either of those, but certainly familiar with Dreamweaver, not that I used it myself. My desktop is Windows at this point in time. :)
Mro wrote to Vk3jed <=-
all those editors pile shit upon shit to your code. they arent
intelligent enough to do otherwise. the best way to do a website if
you arent a pro is get a template and edit it by hand.
Sysop: | Ragnarok |
---|---|
Location: | Dock Sud, Bs As, Argentina |
Users: | 136 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 17:19:28 |
Calls: | 15,171 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 19,857 |
D/L today: |
98 files (8,283K bytes) |
Messages: | 1,691,945 |