• Got to love taxes

    From Dmxrob@VERT/STLWEST to All on Tue Feb 19 14:21:06 2019
    I work in the IT field, and make pretty good money, but over the holidays I have about 3 weeks off and this year decided I wanted to get out and interact with people more and took a holiday job over at Macy's. I knew going into it wouldn't make much money, which I didn't care about, just wanted to get out and about.

    I ended up really enjoying my time at Macy's and had a blast. It was great -- very, very busy -- but great.

    So filing my taxes and almost forgot to enter that W-2. I go in and enter it and pretty much over half of what I made there got taken in taxes. I just rolled my eyes. This was on top of them deducting taxes as well!

    I know there are lots of people getting surprised by their refunds turning into "payments due" this year. Just thought I'd share my tax story as well.

    I think we are quickly approaching the point where the people are going to start to revolt to be honest.


    dmxrob þ BBSing from St. Louis, Missouri since 1988

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Gateway to the West - St. Louis, Missouri - bbs.dmxrob.net
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Dmxrob on Tue Feb 19 12:57:14 2019
    Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Dmxrob to All on Tue Feb 19 2019 02:21 pm

    I work in the IT field, and make pretty good money, but over the holidays I have about 3 weeks off and this year decided I wanted to get out and interact with people more and took a holiday job over at Macy's. I knew going into it wouldn't make much money, which I didn't care about, just wanted to get out and about.

    I ended up really enjoying my time at Macy's and had a blast. It was great -- very, very busy -- but great.

    So filing my taxes and almost forgot to enter that W-2. I go in and enter it and pretty much over half of what I made there got taken in taxes. I just rolled my eyes. This was on top of them deducting taxes as well!

    I know there are lots of people getting surprised by their refunds turning into "payments due" this year. Just thought I'd share my tax story as well.

    I think we are quickly approaching the point where the people are going to start to revolt to be honest.

    I remember hearing that there was a change in the tax laws last year, and for me at least, I think it ended up in me taking home more money throughout last year rather than having a bigger refund this year. I suspect that may have happened to other people too. I've heard it's actually better to bring home more money through the year rather than to get a big tax refund, because when you bring home the money, you can do what you want with it at that time. For example, you could be investing that extra money throught the year for a return rather than getting it back from the government without interest.

    But yeah, I do see what you mean. I heard people talking about getting a big return back this year, and my refund this year will be smaller than last year. I was a little surprised too, but I think it's because I was taking home a bit more throughout last year.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Dmxrob@VERT/STLWEST to Nightfox on Tue Feb 19 17:52:11 2019
    Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Nightfox to Dmxrob on Tue Feb 19 2019 12:57 pm

    I remember hearing that there was a change in the tax laws last year, and for me at least, I think it ended up in me taking home more money throughout last year rather than having a bigger refund this year. I suspect that may have happened to other people too. I've heard it's actually better to bring home more money through the year rather than to get a big tax refund,

    I've never gotten a big tax refund. I invest heavily in my 401k, and still pay mega-taxes (well into the 5 figures). Yet people having babies left and right keep getting "credits" (why should I pay for you to have more kids?), corporations like Amazon with 11 billion (BILLION) in profits and paying zero taxes. Just gets to the point of "enough is enough". I'm getting a little sick and tired of paying for Bezos yacht while he screws women behind his wife's back.

    dmxrob þ BBSing from St. Louis, Missouri since 1988

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Gateway to the West - St. Louis, Missouri - bbs.dmxrob.net
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Dmxrob on Tue Feb 19 17:07:36 2019
    Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Dmxrob to Nightfox on Tue Feb 19 2019 05:52 pm

    I've never gotten a big tax refund. I invest heavily in my 401k, and still pay mega-taxes (well into the 5 figures). Yet people having babies left and right keep getting "credits" (why should I pay for you to have more kids?),

    Maintaining the population can be a good thing.. I've heard the US birth rate is dropping, which means fewer people in the workforce down the road, which means less tax revenue for the government, fewer people in the US going into high-tech jobs, etc..

    corporations like Amazon with 11 billion (BILLION) in profits and
    paying zero taxes. Just gets to the point of "enough is enough". I'm getting a little sick and tired of paying for Bezos yacht while he screws women behind his wife's back.

    No taxes? I thought the super-rich were in a higher tax bracket than ordinary income earners. Or is a company taxed as its own entity separate from its employees?

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Dmxrob@VERT/STLWEST to Nightfox on Tue Feb 19 20:09:01 2019
    Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Nightfox to Dmxrob on Tue Feb 19 2019 05:07 pm

    still pay mega-taxes (well into the 5 figures). Yet people having babies left and right keep getting "credits" (why should I pay for you to have more kids?),

    Maintaining the population can be a good thing.. I've heard the US birth rate is dropping, which means fewer people in the workforce down the road, which means less tax revenue for the government, fewer people in the US going into high-tech jobs, etc..

    It's not the governments job, nor should it be my money, going to support population quotas. The government needs to get their nose out of people's personal lives, and conversely, if you can't afford kids, you shouldn't be having them.

    My partner and I decided long ago we wanted no kids. We enjoy traveling too much and have no want nor desire for kids. Yet indirectly we keep paying for others to have more and more.


    dmxrob þ BBSing from St. Louis, Missouri since 1988

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Gateway to the West - St. Louis, Missouri - bbs.dmxrob.net
  • From Jagossel@VERT/DISCREAL to Nightfox on Tue Feb 19 20:13:41 2019
    Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Nightfox to Dmxrob on Tue Feb 19 2019 12:57 pm

    So filing my taxes and almost forgot to enter that W-2. I go in and enter it and pretty much over half of what I made there got taken in taxes. I just rolled my eyes. This was on top of them deducting taxes as well!

    I know there are lots of people getting surprised by their refunds turning into "payments due" this year. Just thought I'd share my tax story as well.

    But yeah, I do see what you mean. I heard people talking about getting a big return back this year, and my refund this year will be smaller than last year. I was a little surprised too, but I think it's because I was taking home a bit more throughout last year.

    I filed my taxes a couple of weeks ago and I accidently put in last year's information. Once I got to the screen showing the differences, I saw no differences. Then, I realized that I made the mistake, and (good thing) I hadn't filed it. Turns out that I got the wrong form. Once I got the right form, and got the correct year's information in, I saw a drop in the refund and a drop in taxable income. I was disaappointed at first, and especially I knew that I gotten a raise that year. So, I naturally thought that it would be a higher taxable income and a bigger refund; turned out to be smaller. I hate to see next year, though8 I did get a significant raise this year. :/

    -jag
    Code it, Script it, Automate it!

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ -- You've arrived! Disconnected Reality BBS -- discreal.ddns.net
  • From Digital Man@VERT to Dmxrob on Tue Feb 19 19:54:17 2019
    Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Dmxrob to Nightfox on Tue Feb 19 2019 08:09 pm

    It's not the governments job, nor should it be my money, going to support population quotas. The government needs to get their nose out of people's personal lives, and conversely, if you can't afford kids, you shouldn't be having them.

    My partner and I decided long ago we wanted no kids. We enjoy traveling too much and have no want nor desire for kids. Yet indirectly we keep paying for others to have more and more.

    Well, technically, it is the government's job to insure the prosperity of the country (or try to) and encouraging "growth" of all kinds (including population) is part of that. It's also not really "fair" that people with mortgages get a tax break over people that have paid-off their debts (mortage interest is deductable), but the government wants people to borrow and feed the banking system with their interest payments. It's part of the whole capitalistic economic system we're part of. Are we slaves to it? Yeah, pretty much. Of course, there is always this route: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLwcVG_qF74 http://www.songlyrics.com/nofx/freedom-like-a-shopping-cart-lyrics/

    digital man

    Synchronet "Real Fact" #55:
    Synchronet Terminal Server introduced RLogin support w/v3.00c (2000).
    Norco, CA WX: 45.9øF, 68.0% humidity, 1 mph ESE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Vk3jed@VERT/FREEWAY to Dmxrob on Wed Feb 20 18:31:00 2019
    On 02-19-19 20:09, Dmxrob wrote to Nightfox <=-

    My partner and I decided long ago we wanted no kids. We enjoy traveling too much and have no want nor desire for kids. Yet indirectly we keep paying for others to have more and more.

    We also don't want kids, and so we are paying on average in taxes (Australia also has various family payments), and each year the budget is a big yawn, because it is always families with kids who attract the government dollars. :/


    ... I AM IMMORTAL! Well, so far anyway...
    --- MultiMail/Win v0.51
    þ Synchronet þ Freeway BBS, Bendigo Australia. freeway.apana.org.au
  • From Vk3jed@VERT/FREEWAY to Digital Man on Wed Feb 20 18:35:00 2019
    On 02-19-19 19:54, Digital Man wrote to Dmxrob <=-

    Well, technically, it is the government's job to insure the prosperity
    of the country (or try to) and encouraging "growth" of all kinds (including population) is part of that. It's also not really "fair"
    that people with mortgages get a tax break over people that have
    paid-off their debts (mortage interest is deductable), but the

    Here, the tax system favours property investors, through "negative gearing", which means that investment/rental property losses are tax deductible. Once you own a house, it's quite easy to not only get a loan for more property, but also have the government and renters effectively pay your mortgage on that property.

    government wants people to borrow and feed the banking system with
    their interest payments. It's part of the whole capitalistic economic system we're part of. Are we slaves to it? Yeah, pretty much. Of

    Tell me about it, and I'll never be in a position to take advantage of the system. :/

    Yep Australia has some similarities to the US, despite being a different
    ystem.


    ... Yeah, but can a Pontiac do Warp 9?
    --- MultiMail/Win v0.51
    þ Synchronet þ Freeway BBS, Bendigo Australia. freeway.apana.org.au
  • From poindexter FORTRAN@VERT/REALITY to Dmxrob on Wed Feb 20 06:42:00 2019
    Dmxrob wrote to All <=-

    I think we are quickly approaching the point where the people are going
    to start to revolt to be honest.

    I'm glad the press isn't buying the GOP rhetoric this time around. Why
    take to the streets when you can take a Facebook poll and feel like you've
    done your part to topple "THE MAN"?

    We're becoming increasingly complacent, and feeling increasingly unable to effect change.




    ... "We have every reason to be afraid."
    --- MultiMail/XT v0.51
    þ Synchronet þ realitycheckBBS -- http://realitycheckBBS.org
  • From MRO@VERT/BBSESINF to Dmxrob on Wed Feb 20 21:07:03 2019
    Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Dmxrob to All on Tue Feb 19 2019 02:21 pm

    I work in the IT field, and make pretty good money, but over the holidays I have about 3 weeks off and this year decided I wanted to get out and interact with people more and took a holiday job over at Macy's. I knew going into it wouldn't make much money, which I didn't care about, just wanted to get out and about.

    I ended up really enjoying my time at Macy's and had a blast. It was great -- very, very busy -- but great.

    So filing my taxes and almost forgot to enter that W-2. I go in and enter it and pretty much over half of what I made there got taken in taxes. I just rolled my eyes. This was on top of them deducting taxes as well!

    I know there are lots of people getting surprised by their refunds turning into "payments due" this year. Just thought I'd share my tax story as well.

    I think we are quickly approaching the point where the people are going to start to revolt to be honest.



    this is the second tax year after the changes. the people that have to pay taxes when they normally didnt, did not setup their withholdings correctly.

    my employer did it correctly, and i was receiving more money per paycheck after the changed and i didnt owe any. my refund was less because they took less for their interest free loan.

    i cant believe you worked retail! that stuff sucks!
    i did it when i was a kid and it scarred me for life.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From MRO@VERT/BBSESINF to Jagossel on Wed Feb 20 21:12:56 2019
    Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Jagossel to Nightfox on Tue Feb 19 2019 08:13 pm

    and a drop in taxable income. I was disaappointed at first, and especially I knew that I gotten a raise that year. So, I naturally thought that it would be a higher taxable income and a bigger refund; turned out to be smaller. I hate to see next year, though8 I did get a significant raise this year. :/

    your refund is the government taking money it shouldnt take and then collecting interest on it and using it for various things. you are overpaying and then you get it back later.

    if you really like a big chunk of money back at the end of the year, just adjust your withholding.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Dmxrob@VERT/STLWEST to Vk3jed on Thu Feb 21 09:04:22 2019
    Re: Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Vk3jed to Dmxrob on Wed Feb 20 2019 06:31 pm


    We also don't want kids, and so we are paying on average in taxes (Australia also has various family payments), and each year the budget is a big yawn, because it is always families with kids who attract the government dollars. :/

    About 4 years ago we decided that we would no longer support in any way, shape or form any additional "begging" from schools or families. It got to the point where every other week they were selling something to raise money for one thing or another. We simply, but nicely, started declining and have continued to do so. We feel we pay in enough in taxes that we should not have to support them otherwise.

    My partner's brother has 4 kids (and they are talking about a 5th). About two years ago he (my partner's brother) goes on this massive rant to my partner's mom about how we travel too much and we are spending way too much money traveling, and he never gets to travel, blah, blah, blah. My partner's mom shot him down immediately and said it wsa none of his damn business what we did with our money and our time. He chose to have kids, and so that was his choice. Nobody else but him. To this day he has never said another peep about the subject. However, ever since then we have ceased donating to their kids Catholic school. We told him straight to his face after that we were tired of only hearing from them when they wanted to raise money for the school and we'd no longer be participating in that.


    dmxrob þ BBSing from St. Louis, Missouri since 1988

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Gateway to the West - St. Louis, Missouri - bbs.dmxrob.net
  • From MRO@VERT/BBSESINF to Dmxrob on Thu Feb 21 18:20:19 2019
    Re: Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Dmxrob to Vk3jed on Thu Feb 21 2019 09:04 am

    business what we did with our money and our time. He chose to have kids, and so that was his choice. Nobody else but him. To this day he has never said another peep about the subject. However, ever since then we have ceased donating to their kids Catholic school. We told him straight to his face after that we were tired of only hearing from them when they wanted to raise money for the school and we'd no longer be participating in that.



    my girlfriends daughter is into weight lifting. they say they always need money for equipment. for a long stretch they were having fundraisers of different sorts each week. she was required to sell every single ticket to a spaghetti dinner. this was over 100 dollars. next week it was the same thing with candles.

    they have meets and they are an hour away. we have to drive her. if i was in charge of it i would rent a bus. i went there and took a look. they have all old shit. where's that money going?
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Dmxrob@VERT/STLWEST to MRO on Fri Feb 22 09:07:22 2019
    Re: Got to love taxes
    By: MRO to Dmxrob on Wed Feb 20 2019 09:07 pm

    i cant believe you worked retail! that stuff sucks!
    i did it when i was a kid and it scarred me for life.

    Retail is not for everyone. BUt for some people, like myself, it is actually quite fun. I loved all the rush of the holiday season. I was clocking in 24-30 thousand steps a day and when I went home at night I was physically exhausted. But always looked forward to the next day. It really was the people that kept me going -- had a few crabapples, but for the most part the people were amazing.


    dmxrob þ BBSing from St. Louis, Missouri since 1988

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Gateway to the West - St. Louis, Missouri - bbs.dmxrob.net
  • From Rampage@VERT/SESTAR to Jagossel on Fri Feb 22 14:33:03 2019
    Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Jagossel to Nightfox on Tue Feb 19 2019 20:13:41

    I was disaappointed at first, and especially I knew
    that I gotten a raise that year. So, I naturally
    thought that it would be a higher taxable income and a
    bigger refund; turned out to be smaller. I hate to see
    next year, though8 I did get a significant raise this
    year. :/

    this is why i always looked at the tax tables before accepting a raise... if the raise puts me in another bracket but at the bottom of that bracket, yeah, there's generally less left over after taxes... if the raise puts you in the middle of the bracket or higher, then you'll have more to work with at the end... i don't know how the tables look in the last years, though... they're screwed things up a huge amount in the last couple of years...


    )\/(ark

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ SouthEast Star Mail HUB - SESTAR
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Rampage on Fri Feb 22 12:40:15 2019
    Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Rampage to Jagossel on Fri Feb 22 2019 02:33 pm

    this is why i always looked at the tax tables before accepting a raise... if the raise puts me in another bracket but at the bottom of that bracket, yeah, there's generally less left over after taxes... if the raise puts you in the middle of the bracket or higher, then you'll have more to work with at the end... i don't know how the tables look in the last years, though... they're screwed things up a huge amount in the last couple of years...

    At the place where I work, annual raises are generally automatic. They don't ask you first if you want to accept the raise. I suppose if I realize a raise puts me in a higher tax bracket where I'd take home less money, I could probably talk to my manager about it.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From poindexter FORTRAN@VERT/REALITY to Dmxrob on Fri Feb 22 13:12:03 2019
    Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Dmxrob to MRO on Fri Feb 22 2019 09:07 am

    Retail is not for everyone. BUt for some people, like myself, it is actually quite fun. I loved all the rush of the holiday season. I was clocking in 24-30 thousand steps a day and when I went home at night I was physically exhausted. But always looked forward to the next day.

    I've been in IT management for the last 20 years and took a gig doing cabling and wiring access points over the break. It was nice having a peer group, getting some exercise and getting paid by the hour.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ realitycheckBBS -- http://realitycheckBBS.org
  • From halcy0n@VERT/PHARCYDE to Nightfox on Fri Feb 22 15:53:39 2019
    Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Nightfox to Rampage on Fri Feb 22 2019 12:40 pm

    Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Rampage to Jagossel on Fri Feb 22 2019 02:33 pm
    this is why i always looked at the tax tables before accepting a
    raise... if the raise puts me in another bracket but at the bottom
    of that bracket, yeah, there's generally less left over after
    taxes... if the raise puts you in the middle of the bracket or

    At the place where I work, annual raises are generally automatic. They don't ask you first if you want to accept the raise. I suppose if I realize a raise puts me in a higher tax bracket where I'd take home less money, I could probably talk to my manager about it.

    Not entirely sure I follow what either of you are saying, perhaps I missed something. By "Tax Tables" are you referring to the marginal Tax Brackets? If so, you may have a bit of a mistaken understanding of how those work... there isn't a situation in which you can receive a raise, move brackets, and make less money.

    Say you are in the 12% tax bracket making $39,475, and get a raise to make $39,476 which would place you into the 22% bracket. Only $1 would be taxed at 22%, as it is the only money made above the new tax bracket, not all of your income -- whatever income falls within that bracket is taxed at that rate, not all of it. With this information, as you can see, there is not a situation in which you can receive a raise, make more money, and based off the tax bracket system, make less money... it doesn't work like that. You would only make "less money" off all the income that falls into the next bracket itself, as only that amount is taxed higher, so you would absolutely still make more income if you receive a raise on your salary.

    This is a very common misunderstanding / myth in the realm of effective tax rates.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ thePharcyde_ telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin)
  • From Dumas Walker@VERT/CAPCITY2 to MRO on Fri Feb 22 16:31:00 2019
    this is the second tax year after the changes. the people that have to pay taxes when they normally didnt, did not setup their withholdings correctly.

    This is 100% correct. I went to lunch with some friends last week. When I asked them if they had changed their withholdings, I got the impression
    that they had not, and that it was the President's fault that they had not
    done so.

    I let it go. :)

    ---
    þ SLMR 2.1a þ Wind in my hair - shifting and drifting...
    þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to halcy0n on Fri Feb 22 15:57:01 2019
    Re: Got to love taxes
    By: halcy0n to Nightfox on Fri Feb 22 2019 03:53 pm

    If so, you may have a bit of a mistaken understanding of how those work... there isn't a situation in which you can receive a raise, move brackets, and make less money.

    Say you are in the 12% tax bracket making $39,475, and get a raise to make $39,476 which would place you into the 22% bracket. Only $1 would be taxed at 22%, as it is the only money made above the new tax bracket, not all of your income -- whatever income falls within that bracket is taxed at that rate, not all of it. With this information, as you can see, there is not a situation in which you can receive a raise, make more money, and based off the tax bracket system, make less money... it doesn't work like that. You would only make "less money" off all the income that falls into the next bracket itself, as only that amount is taxed higher, so you would absolutely still make more income if you receive a raise on your salary.

    I see.. I suppose I didn't realize taxes worked quite like that.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Dan Clough@VERT/PALANT to Dmxrob on Fri Feb 22 14:45:00 2019
    Dmxrob wrote to MRO <=-

    Retail is not for everyone. BUt for some people, like myself, it
    is actually quite fun. I loved all the rush of the holiday
    season. I was clocking in 24-30 thousand steps a day and when I
    went home at night I was physically exhausted. But always looked
    forward to the next day. It really was the people that kept me
    going -- had a few crabapples, but for the most part the people
    were amazing.

    Ugh. I can think of VERY few things that I like less than
    "holiday season" shopping (as a shopper/consumer). It would be a
    close call between doing that and getting a root canal done.

    I'm not kidding. :)



    ... Pros are those who do their jobs well, even when they don't feel like it. --- MultiMail/Linux v0.51
    þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
  • From Rampage@VERT/SESTAR to halcy0n on Fri Feb 22 21:00:29 2019
    Not entirely sure I follow what either of you are saying, perhaps I missed something. By "Tax Tables" are you referring to the marginal Tax Brackets? If so, you may have a bit of a mistaken understanding of how those work... there isn't a situation in which you can receive a raise, move brackets, and make less money.


    sure there is...

    example:
    you make 600/week
    they take out 100/week
    you are taking home 500/week

    you get a raise to 700/week (higher tax bracket)
    they're now taking out 250/week
    you now are taking home 450/week

    net ""loss"" of 50 in your take home and things are tighter because you don't have that additional 50... you may not even be able to make your rent or insurance payment now...

    i don't have current tax tables here but i've run headlong into exactly this situation more times than i care to count... if you are living paycheck to paycheck, this can really hurt...

    )\/(ark

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ SouthEast Star Mail HUB - SESTAR
  • From halcy0n@VERT/PHARCYDE to Rampage on Sat Feb 23 15:04:29 2019
    Re: Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Rampage to halcy0n on Fri Feb 22 2019 09:00 pm

    sure there is...

    example:
    you make 600/week
    they take out 100/week
    you are taking home 500/week

    you get a raise to 700/week (higher tax bracket)
    they're now taking out 250/week
    you now are taking home 450/week

    net ""loss"" of 50 in your take home and things are tighter because you don't have that additional 50... you may not even be able to make your rent or insurance payment now...

    i don't have current tax tables here but i've run headlong into exactly this situation more times than i care to count... if you are living paycheck to paycheck, this can really hurt...

    None of this is correct and is fundamentally flawed thinking on how tax brackets work...

    If a yearly raise in your income places you into a new tax bracket, ONLY THE NEW INCOME THAT FALLS IN THAT BRACKET is taxed at the new rate. NONE of the income earned below that tax bracket is touched by the next bracket's increased rate. There is not a scenario where from the marginal tax bracket system you would make more money, and take home less.

    With what you're describing it sounds like you aren't updating your withholding information, or taking advantage of or understanding all your deduction options. This absolutely isn't meant to insult you in any way, but I would highly suggest taking your financial information to a professional, including how you file on your employer information, to make sure you are not hamstringing yourself due to not understanding how the system works.

    There are ways that if you were taking advantage of deductions, special programs, welfare options, etc that were only usable under one income level and get a raise, then lose those options, where you could possibly be negatively effected, but the tax brackets are absolutely not one of them. As long as the terms of the raise/promotion/etc are agreeable to you, you should always take a pay raise.... always. Turning down money because you don't understand how the tax bracket system works is very, very flawed thinking and will only harm you personally.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ thePharcyde_ telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin)
  • From halcy0n@VERT/PHARCYDE to Nightfox on Sat Feb 23 15:20:36 2019
    Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Nightfox to halcy0n on Fri Feb 22 2019 03:57 pm


    I see.. I suppose I didn't realize taxes worked quite like that.

    You wouldn't be alone in the slightest.

    The tax system's complexity is ridiculous, punishes those who either don't fully understand it or can't pay someone else an enormous amount to find every possible loophole. Therefore it only benefits either those wealthy enough to pay a team of financial advisors, or the government which reaps the benefits of leaving so much money on the table. It also leads people to fight against financial changes in government that would benefit them personally, while people feed them incorrect information about the systems they already don't fully understand to begin with.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ thePharcyde_ telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin)
  • From MRO@VERT/BBSESINF to Rampage on Sat Feb 23 17:31:37 2019
    Re: Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Rampage to halcy0n on Fri Feb 22 2019 09:00 pm


    net ""loss"" of 50 in your take home and things are tighter because you don't have that additional 50... you may not even be able to make your rent or insurance payment now...

    i don't have current tax tables here but i've run headlong into exactly this situation more times than i care to count... if you are living paycheck to paycheck, this can really hurt...


    i have lived paycheck to paycheck my entire life. i would also get raises every year or so. i never made less money than before.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Vk3jed@VERT/FREEWAY to Dmxrob on Sat Feb 23 17:56:00 2019
    On 02-21-19 09:04, Dmxrob wrote to Vk3jed <=-

    About 4 years ago we decided that we would no longer support in any
    way, shape or form any additional "begging" from schools or families.
    It got to the point where every other week they were selling something
    to raise money for one thing or another. We simply, but nicely,
    started declining and have continued to do so. We feel we pay in
    enough in taxes that we should not have to support them otherwise.

    Fair enough. This sort of thing doesn't seem to be as bad here. Schools do fundraise, but they're not as obnoxious about it, it seems.

    My partner's brother has 4 kids (and they are talking about a 5th).
    About two years ago he (my partner's brother) goes on this massive rant
    to my partner's mom about how we travel too much and we are spending
    way too much money traveling, and he never gets to travel, blah, blah, blah. My partner's mom shot him down immediately and said it wsa none
    of his damn business what we did with our money and our time. He chose
    to have kids, and so that was his choice. Nobody else but him. To
    this day he has never said another peep about the subject. However,
    ever since then we have ceased donating to their kids Catholic school.
    We told him straight to his face after that we were tired of only
    hearing from them when they wanted to raise money for the school and
    we'd no longer be participating in that.

    Well, it's a matter if priorities. If you want to have kids, fine. Don't complain that you can't travel. I don't care how people decide to spend their money, provided they're taking responsibility for the consequences of their decisions.


    ... I had a cat once... tasted like chicken.
    --- MultiMail/Win v0.51
    þ Synchronet þ Freeway BBS, Bendigo Australia. freeway.apana.org.au
  • From poindexter FORTRAN@VERT/REALITY to halcy0n on Sat Feb 23 06:50:00 2019
    halcy0n wrote to Nightfox <=-

    Say you are in the 12% tax bracket making $39,475, and get a raise to
    make $39,476 which would place you into the 22% bracket. Only $1 would
    be taxed at 22%, as it is the only money made above the new tax
    bracket, not all of your income -- whatever income falls within that bracket is taxed at that rate, not all of it.

    This is a very common misunderstanding / myth in the realm of effective tax rates.

    Stop trying to confuse us with FACTS! :)

    Seriously, that's a great explanation of tax rates. Thanks!



    ... State the problem in words as clearly as possible
    --- MultiMail/XT v0.51
    þ Synchronet þ realitycheckBBS -- http://realitycheckBBS.org
  • From Dumas Walker@VERT/CAPCITY2 to HALCY0N on Sun Feb 24 09:51:00 2019
    If a yearly raise in your income places you into a new tax bracket, ONLY THE >NEW INCOME THAT FALLS IN THAT BRACKET is taxed at the new rate. NONE of the >income earned below that tax bracket is touched by the next bracket's increased
    rate. There is not a scenario where from the marginal tax bracket system you >would make more money, and take home less.

    This is correct, at least it was in my state. They just went to a flat tax rate so it is all moot now. But when they had brackets, the first $N earned were charged at rate A%, the next $N over and above were charged B%, etc.

    So, if you made $5000, and the first bracket ended at $3000 and taxed at 2%, you paid $60 tax on your first $3000. If the $5000 fell in a 3% tax
    bracket, you only paid 3% on the amount that you went above the first bracket. So, 3000 * .02 = $60, and ( 5000 - 3000 ) * .03 = $60, for a total tax of $120 on that $5000. It would not be the full $5000 * .03.

    ---
    þ SLMR 2.1a þ What do you mean, QWK?? It took me over an hour to read!!
    þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP
  • From halcy0n@VERT/PHARCYDE to poindexter FORTRAN on Sun Feb 24 14:33:22 2019
    Re: Re: Got to love taxes
    By: poindexter FORTRAN to halcy0n on Sat Feb 23 2019 06:50 am

    Stop trying to confuse us with FACTS! :)

    Seriously, that's a great explanation of tax rates. Thanks!

    Hey we ALL benefit from understanding this stuff better in the long run. A well informed populace is vital to a democracy :)

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ thePharcyde_ telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin)
  • From halcy0n@VERT/PHARCYDE to Dumas Walker on Sun Feb 24 14:44:28 2019
    Re: Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Dumas Walker to HALCY0N on Sun Feb 24 2019 09:51 am

    This is correct, at least it was in my state. They just went to a flat tax rate so it is all moot now. But when they had brackets, the first $N earned were charged at rate A%, the next $N over and above were charged B%, etc.

    So, if you made $5000, and the first bracket ended at $3000 and taxed at 2%, you paid $60 tax on your first $3000. If the $5000 fell in a 3% tax bracket, you only paid 3% on the amount that you went above the first bracket. So, 3000 * .02 = $60, and ( 5000 - 3000 ) * .03 = $60, for a total tax of $120 on that $5000. It would not be the full $5000 * .03.

    Yup, this is exactly how it works. Thank you for giving another real-world example of it in action as well, always helps to make it as easy to understand as possible.

    I just hate seeing individuals financially hurt themselves over a misunderstanding of something like this, so I piped in. I hope I didn't offend anyone in the process, as it was coming from a place of wanting to make sure people were making sound financial decisions for themselves and their families where possible.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ thePharcyde_ telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin)
  • From Swolf154@VERT/HAVENS to halcy0n on Mon Feb 25 04:02:52 2019
    Re: Re: Got to love taxes
    By: halcy0n to poindexter FORTRAN on Sun Feb 24 2019 02:33 pm

    Stop trying to confuse us with FACTS! :)
    well informed populace is vital to a democracy :)

    Errr...what's a "populace"???

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Sent from Havens BBS
  • From Vk3jed@VERT/FREEWAY to halcy0n on Mon Feb 25 18:04:00 2019
    On 02-24-19 14:33, halcy0n wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-

    @VIA: VERT/PHARCYDE
    Re: Re: Got to love taxes
    By: poindexter FORTRAN to halcy0n on Sat Feb 23 2019 06:50 am

    Stop trying to confuse us with FACTS! :)

    Seriously, that's a great explanation of tax rates. Thanks!

    Hey we ALL benefit from understanding this stuff better in the long
    run. A well informed populace is vital to a democracy :)

    Agree, well informed people are essential to a functioning democracy. And yes, a good piece on how tax brackets and marginal tax rates work. Spot on. :) A related issue is tax deductibie expenditure, like donating to charity (donations over $2 to DGR registered charities in are tax deductible). Contrary to common misconception, you don't get all of that donation back. Instead, the donation is deducted from your income, which means you get (donation * marginal tax rate) back. Which for me is a big fat $0, because I don't earn enough to reach the first tax bracket. Needless to say, I don't bother getting receipts for any donations I make. :)


    ... Quiet, don't type so hard, I've got a headache!
    --- MultiMail/Win v0.51
    þ Synchronet þ Freeway BBS, Bendigo Australia. freeway.apana.org.au
  • From Dan Clough@VERT/PALANT to Swolf154 on Mon Feb 25 07:52:00 2019
    Swolf154 wrote to halcy0n <=-

    well informed populace is vital to a democracy :)

    Errr...what's a "populace"???

    popùuùlace
    Dictionary result for populace
    /'p„py?l?s/
    noun
    noun: populace; plural noun: populaces

    the people living in a particular country or area.
    "the party misjudged the mood of the populace"
    synonyms: population, inhabitants, residents, natives,
    occupants, occupiers; community, country, public, people, nation;
    common people, general public, man/woman in the street,
    masses, multitude, rank and file, commonality, commonalty, third
    estate, plebeians, proletariat, crowd;
    man/woman on the street;
    informalfolk, common folk;
    informalJoe Public, Joe Bloggs;
    informalJohn Doe;
    humorousdenizens;
    derogatorythe hoi polloi, common herd, rabble, mob, riffraff,
    the canaille, the great unwashed, ragtag (and bobtail), proles,
    plebs;
    rareindigenes

    Origin
    late 16th century: from French, from Italian popolaccio 'common
    people', from popolo 'people' + the pejorative suffix -accio .


    ... So easy, a child could do it. Child sold separately.
    --- MultiMail/Linux v0.51
    þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
  • From Halcy0n@VERT to Swolf154 on Mon Feb 25 13:54:46 2019
    Re: Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Swolf154 to halcy0n on Mon Feb 25 2019 04:02 am

    Stop trying to confuse us with FACTS! :)
    well informed populace is vital to a democracy :)

    Errr...what's a "populace"???

    Populace, as in "the people living in a particular country or area".

    It was a ham-fisted attempt at using a variation of a quote usually attributed to Thomas Jefferson I think, heh.

    Maybe a better quote of his to use would have been, "Wherever the people are well informed they can be trusted with their own government; that whenever things get so far wrong as to attract their notice, they may be relied on to set them to rights." :)
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Halcy0n@VERT to Vk3jed on Mon Feb 25 14:17:16 2019
    Re: Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Vk3jed to halcy0n on Mon Feb 25 2019 06:04 pm

    :) A related issue is tax deductibie expenditure, like donating to charity (donations over $2 to DGR registered charities in are tax deductible). Contrary to common misconception, you don't get all of that donation back. Instead, the donation is deducted from your income, which means you get (donation * marginal tax rate) back. Which for me is a big fat $0, because I don't earn enough to reach the first tax bracket. Needless to say, I don't bother getting receipts for any donations I make. :)

    Yeah, a lot of people incorrectly assume at some point rich people just make donations and say oh it's all just a write-off anyway... when that's also not how it works, heh. You can donate and get a deduction, but it's always less then your donation, so you're always losing money -- through that system specifically, anyway ;).
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From poindexter FORTRAN@VERT/REALITY to Halcy0n on Tue Feb 26 06:36:00 2019
    Halcy0n wrote to Vk3jed <=-

    Yeah, a lot of people incorrectly assume at some point rich people just make donations and say oh it's all just a write-off anyway... when
    that's also not how it works, heh. You can donate and get a deduction,
    but it's always less then your donation, so you're always losing money
    -- through that system specifically, anyway ;).

    Suze Orman lived in my neighborhood back in the '90s, she'd stop at garage sales and give unsolicited advice, telling them they were foolish for
    having garage sales and would be better off taking the donation.

    She was quite a piece of work.




    ... Have you ever seen anything like this place?
    --- MultiMail/XT v0.51
    þ Synchronet þ realitycheckBBS -- http://realitycheckBBS.org
  • From Halcy0n@VERT to poindexter FORTRAN on Tue Feb 26 12:31:14 2019
    Re: Re: Got to love taxes
    By: poindexter FORTRAN to Halcy0n on Tue Feb 26 2019 06:36 am

    Suze Orman lived in my neighborhood back in the '90s, she'd stop at garage sales and give unsolicited advice, telling them they were foolish for
    having garage sales and would be better off taking the donation.

    She was quite a piece of work.

    I can't even fathom why you would suggest that to people, unless it's because instead of selling shirts for $0.10 each you could supremely overstate the value of items, thus subverting the deduction % .... but in that case you're just being a shyster illegally working the system -- but I guess that would be par for the course then wouldn't it? :P
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Vk3jed@VERT/FREEWAY to Halcy0n on Tue Feb 26 15:38:00 2019
    On 02-25-19 14:17, Halcy0n wrote to Vk3jed <=-

    Yeah, a lot of people incorrectly assume at some point rich people just make donations and say oh it's all just a write-off anyway... when
    that's also not how it works, heh. You can donate and get a deduction,
    but it's always less then your donation, so you're always losing money
    -- through that system specifically, anyway ;).

    Correct, you get it. :)


    ... Never assume the obvious is true!
    --- MultiMail/Win v0.51
    þ Synchronet þ Freeway BBS, Bendigo Australia. freeway.apana.org.au
  • From Rampage@VERT/SESTAR to MRO on Fri Mar 1 14:28:10 2019
    Re: Re: Got to love taxes
    By: MRO to Rampage on Sat Feb 23 2019 17:31:37

    i have lived paycheck to paycheck my entire life. i would also
    get raises every year or so. i never made less money than
    before.

    i didn't say you "made" less $$$... i said that you "can take home" less $$$... there's a big difference...

    another is that the other poster seems to be only talking about the end-of-the-year tax mess and not considering the (bi-)weekly take home pay that most ordinary folk are looking at...

    it should also be noted that i'm speaking in general of folks making so little that they cannot afford to not look (eg: <(2|3)0000/yr) whereas others making more don't look until the end of the year since they will generally have enough for most anything they want...


    )\/(ark

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ SouthEast Star Mail HUB - SESTAR
  • From Rampage@VERT/SESTAR to Swolf154 on Fri Mar 1 14:33:27 2019
    Re: Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Swolf154 to halcy0n on Mon Feb 25 2019 04:02:52

    Stop trying to confuse us with FACTS! :)
    well informed populace is vital to a democracy :)

    Errr...what's a "populace"???

    another word for "population"... search google for "define: populace"... make sure you use the ':' in the search like i wrote it... it works for most any word and possibly some phrases...


    )\/(ark

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ SouthEast Star Mail HUB - SESTAR
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Rampage on Fri Mar 1 12:40:11 2019
    Re: Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Rampage to Swolf154 on Fri Mar 01 2019 02:33 pm

    another word for "population"... search google for "define: populace"... make sure you use the ':' in the search like i wrote it... it works for most any word and possibly some phrases...

    I usually would search it like "populace definition". That tends to work too.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Dumas Walker@VERT/CAPCITY2 to RAMPAGE on Fri Mar 1 19:48:00 2019
    i didn't say you "made" less $$$... i said that you "can take home" less $$$...
    there's a big difference...

    If you take home less than, there is more to it than the taxes which are
    taken out. The taxes that come out themselves should not eat up
    your whole raise and then some, regardless of whether you are talking the
    end of the year or every-other-week. In order for that to be true, either
    your withholdings were increased (which means you should have gotten it
    back at the end of the year) or you were bumped up into a tax bracket that
    is > 100%.

    Either that or you have some really messed up local taxes or fees, or some other pay-based deductions that are really screwing the math up.

    I had an unwanted raise once (because it accompanied an increase in hours) which was supposed to add nearly ~7% to my gross. It knocked me into a
    higher tax bracket, so my actual take home was something like $10 more
    every two weeks, which was more like < 1% of my previous net. It was NOT
    AT ALL worth it, but my take home did not decrease.

    ---
    þ SLMR 2.1a þ Gone crazy, be back later, please leave message.
    þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP
  • From MRO@VERT/BBSESINF to Rampage on Sat Mar 2 09:39:45 2019
    Re: Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Rampage to MRO on Fri Mar 01 2019 02:28 pm

    Re: Re: Got to love taxes
    By: MRO to Rampage on Sat Feb 23 2019 17:31:37

    i have lived paycheck to paycheck my entire life. i would also
    get raises every year or so. i never made less money than
    before.

    i didn't say you "made" less $$$... i said that you "can take home" less $$$... there's a big difference...


    i have never taken home less after making a raise. i've had raises that increase my yearly income by 10k each so i think that's substantial enough to notice.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Halcy0n@VERT to Rampage on Sat Mar 2 14:24:11 2019
    Re: Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Rampage to MRO on Fri Mar 01 2019 02:28 pm

    i didn't say you "made" less $$$... i said that you "can take home" less $$$... there's a big difference...

    another is that the other poster seems to be only talking about the end-of-the-year tax mess and not considering the (bi-)weekly take home pay that most ordinary folk are looking at...

    As the other posters have said, neither of these are how it works. I was previously replying out of confusion because you and Nighthawk were saying something along the lines of "don't take a raise if it pushes you into the lower end of the next tax bracket because you'll take home less money", and this can't happen due to the tax brackets.

    If you take a raise, and you do not change your withholdings, it may take more money out of your check then you were used to, but it will be there at the end of the year during tax time. If you do change your withholdings, you will get more out of each check but may have to pay into your taxes at the end of the year if you don't withhold enough.

    If you're taking home less money per check after a raise, it's because you didn't change your withholdings, which is your responsibility and not "Them really screwing things up" or any such nonsense. It's your money, why aren't you taking responsibility for understanding it? If overall you literally made less money in a year after receiving a raise, you've been the victim of theft and need to contact the authorities.

    Also what suddenly makes you think we make tons of money and are not "ordinary folk"? Because we educated outselves in how the tax system we pay into for our entire lives works? That's.... not a good outlook to have. It didn't cost me anything to read up on this stuff, just time.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From ROBERT WOLFE@VERT/OTHETA to RAMPAGE on Mon Mar 4 01:38:00 2019
    Errr...what's a "populace"???

    another word for "population"... search google for "define: populace"... mak
    sure you use the ':' in the search like i wrote it... it works for most any word and possibly some phrases...

    I think it is a European term :)

    --- Wildcat! v7.0.454.7 (Nov 13 2018), Editor Mod v2.1
    þ wcQWK 7.0 ÷ Omicron Theta * Southaven MS * winserver.org
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to ROBERT WOLFE on Mon Mar 4 10:00:14 2019
    Re: Re: Got to love taxes
    By: ROBERT WOLFE to RAMPAGE on Mon Mar 04 2019 01:38 am

    Errr...what's a "populace"???

    another word for "population"... search google for "define:
    populace"... mak sure you use the ':' in the search like i wrote
    it... it works for most any word and possibly some phrases...

    I think it is a European term :)

    I grew up an the US and I know what "populace" means..

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From MRO@VERT/BBSESINF to Nightfox on Wed Mar 6 19:34:12 2019
    Re: Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Nightfox to ROBERT WOLFE on Mon Mar 04 2019 10:00 am

    Re: Re: Got to love taxes
    By: ROBERT WOLFE to RAMPAGE on Mon Mar 04 2019 01:38 am

    Errr...what's a "populace"???

    another word for "population"... search google for "define:
    populace"... mak sure you use the ':' in the search like i wrote
    it... it works for most any word and possibly some phrases...

    I think it is a European term :)

    I grew up an the US and I know what "populace" means..


    as do i.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Rampage@VERT/SESTAR to Nightfox on Tue Apr 30 02:00:25 2019
    Re: Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Nightfox to Rampage on Fri Mar 01 2019 12:40:11

    another word for "population"... search google for "define:
    populace"... make sure you use the ':' in the search like i
    wrote it.. it works for most any word and possibly some
    phrases...

    I usually would search it like "populace definition". That
    tends to work too.

    yeah... i've found doing it the way i showed above gives the result like a dictionary instead of a lot of pages with that search phrase... i've been doing it like that since google introduced the feature... that was back when they brought in the ability to do math and conversions ;)


    )\/(ark

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ The SouthEast Star Mail HUB - SESTAR
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Rampage on Tue Apr 30 09:45:05 2019
    Re: Re: Got to love taxes
    By: Rampage to Nightfox on Tue Apr 30 2019 02:00 am

    another word for "population"... search google for "define:
    populace"... make sure you use the ':' in the search like i
    wrote it.. it works for most any word and possibly some
    phrases...

    I usually would search it like "populace definition". That
    tends to work too.

    yeah... i've found doing it the way i showed above gives the result like a dictionary instead of a lot of pages with that search phrase... i've been

    Same with me, I usually get a dictionary-like definition.

    doing it like that since google introduced the feature... that was back when they brought in the ability to do math and conversions ;)

    I didn't even know the feature existed in Google until you had mentioned it. How do you hear about such features when they're introduced?

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com