1. Forum
  2. DOVE-Net
  3. General

  • dovenet nodelist?

    From Ogg@VERT/CAPCITY2 to poindexter FORTRAN on Thu Jan 7 22:32:00 2021
    Hello poindexter!

    ** On Wednesday 06.01.21 - 05:35, poindexter FORTRAN wrote to Ogg:


    Does DOVEnet have an official FTN network?

    That I do not know. Why "723" ? Dunno. But there is probably a
    consenus on the zone number and there is probably an adhoc
    nodelist modified at key cooperating BBSes.

    Maybe a Dovenet higher-up can chime in.


    --- OpenXP 5.0.48
    * Origin: Ogg's Dovenet Point (723:320/1.9)
    þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP
  • From Warpslide@VERT/NRBBS to Ogg on Fri Jan 8 14:09:00 2021
    On 07 Jan 2021, Ogg said the following...

    That I do not know. Why "723" ? Dunno. But there is probably a consenus on the zone number and there is probably an adhoc
    nodelist modified at key cooperating BBSes.

    Deon/alterego also offers DOVE-Net via FTN, he uses zone 10 for that. I don't think it "matters" what zone is used as you're just gating a QWK network to FTN. I think all that matters is that the zone number is not being used by those on the gate.


    Jay

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2021/01/05 (Raspberry Pi/32)
    * Origin: Northern Realms
  • From Plt@VERT/SBBS to Ogg on Fri Mar 12 23:49:07 2021
    On Thu 7-Jan-2021 22:32 , Ogg@1:275/201.0 said to Poindexter Fortran:

    Hello poindexter!

    ** On Wednesday 06.01.21 - 05:35, poindexter FORTRAN wrote to Ogg:


    Does DOVEnet have an official FTN network?

    That I do not know. Why "723" ? Dunno. But there is probably a
    consenus on the zone number and there is probably an adhoc
    nodelist modified at key cooperating BBSes.

    Maybe a Dovenet higher-up can chime in.


    I think it would be a overkill do it,


    Phil

    --- CNet/5
    * Origin: 1:275/201.0 (1:275/201.30)
    þ Synchronet þ sbbs.dynu.net 2025