Re: BSD
By: Digital Man to Ib Joe on Tue Feb 02 2010 02:17 pm

Re: BSD
By: Ib Joe to Digital Man on Tue Feb 02 2010 12:51 am

Re: BSD
By: Digital Man to Corey on Tue Jan 12 2010 06:20 pm

I use ubuntu 9 and the gnu make is installed as make.
but you need to copy the GNUmakefile to makefile.

make -f GNUmakefile should work just fine. NO need to copy or rename GNUmakefile.

This drives me nuts... I didn't see this in your setup instructions...

You don't normally need to use the '-f' option.

digital man

Snapple "Real Fact" #126:
A pigeon's feathers are heavier than its bones.

---
þ Synchronet þ The Wastelands BBS - wastelands-bbs.net - Keeping The Tradition Alive

Re: BSD
By: Ronald Reid to All on Sun Jul 08 2012 09:04 pm

I use ubuntu 9 and the gnu make is installed as make.
but you need to copy the GNUmakefile to makefile.

make -f GNUmakefile should work just fine. NO need to copy or
rename GNUmakefile.

This drives me nuts... I didn't see this in your setup
instructions...

I hear you, it drove me nuts too, and I could swear I didn't see it in
the instructions, but there is a spot on the documentation that says
something about gnumake may be called make, if you read the fine details
of the packages, sometimes they'll say gnumake and install it telling you
it's called make, which was fine by me, provided that it worked like make.
If it's GNUMake renamed as Make, why not have it support all files as GNU
Make as is? There is versions of Make and GnuMake out there, Make is not
allways GNU Make, so if you want to make a Make version of GNUMake, then
in the installation, create a symbolic link to gnumake and have the program
check upon startup if it was called via make or gnumake and setup the
filename and command line appropriately, or just check for both files....
Good grief, Linux is *SUPPOSED TO BE BETTER*, not more aggrivating!

---
þ Synchronet þ Roach Guts -- kingcoder.net

Re: BSD
By: John Guillory to Ronald Reid on Tue Jul 10 2012 03:03 pm

Good grief, Linux is *SUPPOSED TO BE BETTER*, not more aggrivating!

I've never understood where this myth comes from.

---
http://DuckDuckGo.com/ a better search engine that respects your privacy.
þ Synchronet þ My Brand-New BBS (All the cool SysOps run STOCK!)

Re: BSD
By: John Guillory to Ronald Reid on Tue Jul 10 2012 15:03:07

Good grief, Linux is *SUPPOSED TO BE BETTER*, not more aggrivating!

Anything you know really well generally is better. :)

But not knowing something well definitly contributes to folks dislike of
said thing. :-)


--Chris

---------------------------------
Chris Trainor - FleetHQ BBS
telnet://bbs.fleethq.org

---
þ Synchronet þ FleetHQ BBS - Greenville, RI

Re: BSD
By: Deuce to John Guillory on Tue Jul 10 2012 04:48 pm

Re: BSD
By: John Guillory to Ronald Reid on Tue Jul 10 2012 03:03 pm

Good grief, Linux is *SUPPOSED TO BE BETTER*, not more aggrivating!

I've never understood where this myth comes from.

apples use bsd. from thier iphones to tablets to desktops.

"Practise safe Lunch, Use a Condiment"


---
þ Synchronet þ Three Stooges Gentlemens Club - Las Vegas, Nv - tsgc.dyndns.org

Re: BSD
By: Corey to Deuce on Tue Jul 10 2012 06:46 pm

Good grief, Linux is *SUPPOSED TO BE BETTER*, not more
aggrivating!

I've never understood where this myth comes from.

apples use bsd. from thier iphones to tablets to desktops.

Which, while incorrect, still has nothing to do with Linux or how it's supposed
to be better.

---
http://DuckDuckGo.com/ a better search engine that respects your privacy.
þ Synchronet þ My Brand-New BBS (All the cool SysOps run STOCK!)