1. Forum
  2. DOVE-Net
  3. Synchronet Discussion

  • ipv6

    From Ragnarok@ragnarok@docksud.com.ar to DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion on Tue Mar 31 02:11:34 2015
    i setup iv6 on my server via sixxs tunnel, have synchronet support to
    bind to ipv6 for telnet and another services?
  • From Digital Man@VERT to Ragnarok on Tue Mar 31 17:12:54 2015
    Re: ipv6
    By: Ragnarok to DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion on Tue Mar 31 2015 02:11 am

    i setup iv6 on my server via sixxs tunnel, have synchronet support to
    bind to ipv6 for telnet and another services?

    Not currently. Deuce does have a fork in the works which is planned to be merged into the CVS repos 'sometime soon'.

    digital man

    Synchronet "Real Fact" #55:
    Synchronet Terminal Server introduced SecureShell (SSH) support w/v3.14a (2006).
    Norco, CA WX: 71.7øF, 49.0% humidity, 18 mph ESE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ telnet://vert.synchro.net
  • From Ragnarok@ragnarok@docksud.com.ar to Digital Man on Wed Apr 1 17:02:32 2015
    El 31/03/15 a las 21:12, "Digital Man" escibió:
    Re: ipv6
    By: Ragnarok to DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion on Tue Mar 31 2015 02:11 am

    i setup iv6 on my server via sixxs tunnel, have synchronet support to
    bind to ipv6 for telnet and another services?

    Not currently. Deuce does have a fork in the works which is planned to be merged into the CVS repos 'sometime soon'.

    digital man


    good! ip4 will be more expensive than gold 'sometime soon' too
  • From Bill McGarrity@VERT to Ragnarok on Wed Apr 1 18:25:00 2015
    On 04-01-15 17:02, Ragnarok wrote to Digital Man <=-

    By: Ragnarok to DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion on Tue Mar 31 2015 02:11 am

    i setup iv6 on my server via sixxs tunnel, have synchronet support to bind to ipv6 for telnet and another services?

    Not currently. Deuce does have a fork in the works which is planned to be merged into the CVS repos 'sometime soon'.

    digital man


    good! ip4 will be more expensive than gold 'sometime soon' too

    IPv4 will probably be extinct in a few years... that's why I already made the change. Comcast offered it native included in the plan, I jumped on it.


    --

    Bill

    Telnet: tequilamockingbirdonline.net
    Web: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net
    FTP: ftp.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:2121
    IRC: irc.tequilamockingbirdonline.net Ports: 6661-6670 SSL: +6697
    Radio: radio.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:8010/live


    ... Look Twice... Save a Life!! Motorcycles are Everywhere!!
    === MultiMail/Win32 v0.50
    --- SBBSecho 2.27-Win32
    * Origin: TequilaMockingbird Online - Toms River, NJ (1:266/404)
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ telnet://vert.synchro.net
  • From mark firestone@VERT to BILL MCGARRITY on Thu Apr 2 15:55:00 2015
    --- BILL MCGARRITY wrote --

    IPv4 will probably be extinct in a few years... that's why I already made change. Comcast offered it native included in the plan, I jumped on it

    Where is my flying car and my free fusion power?


    ---
    * TARDI
  • From Ragnarok@ragnarok@docksud.com.ar to mark firestone on Thu Apr 2 16:21:28 2015
    El 02/04/15 a las 12:55, "mark firestone" escibió:
    --- BILL MCGARRITY wrote --

    IPv4 will probably be extinct in a few years... that's why I already made >> change. Comcast offered it native included in the plan, I jumped on it

    Where is my flying car and my free fusion power?


    you can purchase it on ebay.
  • From Bill McGarrity@VERT to mark firestone on Thu Apr 2 14:32:00 2015
    On 04-02-15 15:55, mark firestone wrote to BILL MCGARRITY <=-

    --- BILL MCGARRITY wrote --

    IPv4 will probably be extinct in a few years... that's why I already made change. Comcast offered it native included in the plan, I jumped on it

    Where is my flying car and my free fusion power?


    Patience grasshopper... patience.. :)


    --

    Bill

    Telnet: tequilamockingbirdonline.net
    Web: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net
    FTP: ftp.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:2121
    IRC: irc.tequilamockingbirdonline.net Ports: 6661-6670 SSL: +6697
    Radio: radio.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:8010/live


    ... Look Twice... Save a Life!!! Motorcycles are Everywhere!!
    === MultiMail/Win32 v0.50
    --- SBBSecho 2.27-Win32
    * Origin: TequilaMockingbird
  • From Mro@VERT to All on Thu Apr 2 16:25:03 2015
    Re: Re: ipv6
    By: mark firestone to BILL MCGARRITY on Thu Apr 02 2015 03:55 pm

    --- BILL MCGARRITY wrote --

    IPv4 will probably be extinct in a few years... that's why I already made change. Comcast offered it native included in the plan, I jumped on it

    Where is my flying car and my free fusion power?


    they've been saying it's going to be extinct in a few years for many many years.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Khelair@VERT to mark firestone on Thu Apr 2 12:40:15 2015
    Re: Re: ipv6
    By: mark firestone to BILL MCGARRITY on Thu Apr 02 2015 15:55:00

    Where is my flying car and my free fusion power?

    Area 51 next to Tesla.

    ---
    Borg Burgers: We do it our way; your way is irrelevant.
    þ Synchronet þ Tinf
  • From Underminer@VERT to Mro on Fri Apr 3 02:52:23 2015
    Re: Re: ipv6
    By: Mro to All on Thu Apr 02 2015 16:25:03

    Re: Re: ipv6
    By: mark firestone to BILL MCGARRITY on Thu Apr 02 2015 03:55 pm

    --- BILL MCGARRITY wrote --

    IPv4 will probably be extinct in a few years... that's why I already
    made change. Comcast offered it native included in the plan, I
    jumped on it

    Where is my flying car and my free fusion power?


    they've been saying it's going to be extinct in a few years for many many years.

    Yeah, I'd put more stock in it if IPv6 actually worked properly with anything that supposedly supported it. I've lost count of how many times I've had to disable it on clients' routers to stop random disconnects.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ The Undermin
  • From Deuce@VERT to Underminer on Sat Apr 4 02:15:30 2015
    Re: Re: ipv6
    By: Underminer to Mro on Fri Apr 03 2015 02:52 am

    Yeah, I'd put more stock in it if IPv6 actually worked properly with anything that supposedly supported it. I've lost count of how many times I've had to disable it on clients' routers to stop random disconnects.

    I've been using it for years and the only times I have problems is when servers
    are set up incorrectly.

    ---
    http://DuckDuckGo.com/ a better search engine that respects your privacy.
    þ Synchronet þ My Brand
  • From Underminer@VERT to Deuce on Sat Apr 4 18:28:42 2015
    Re: Re: ipv6
    By: Deuce to Underminer on Sat Apr 04 2015 02:15:30

    The problem is most of those incorectly set up servers are on the ISP end.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ The Undermine - undermine.ddns.net
  • From Ragnarok@ragnarok@docksud.com.ar to Deuce on Sun Apr 5 01:30:42 2015
    El 04/04/15 a las 06:15, Deuce escibió:
    Re: Re: ipv6
    By: Underminer to Mro on Fri Apr 03 2015 02:52 am

    Yeah, I'd put more stock in it if IPv6 actually worked properly with anything that supposedly supported it. I've lost count of how many times I've had to disable it on clients' routers to stop random disconnects.

    I've been using it for years and the only times I have problems is when servers
    are set up incorrectly.

    if finish my setup for ipv6 with sixxs for my lan, i can reach my server bbs.docksud.com.ar from the world . I now research how to formward the
    23 ipv6 to the ipv4 port until synchronet support ipv6 natively

    i hope that syncterm be support it.
  • From Deuce@VERT to Underminer on Sun Apr 5 01:22:48 2015
    Re: Re: ipv6
    By: Underminer to Deuce on Sat Apr 04 2015 06:28 pm

    The problem is most of those incorectly set up servers are on the ISP end.

    I dunno, my IPv6 ISP is Hurricane Electric. It's not a problem with the protocol itself though.

  • From Deuce@VERT to Ragnarok on Sun Apr 5 01:23:36 2015
    Re: Re: ipv6
    By: Ragnarok to Deuce on Sun Apr 05 2015 01:30 am

    i hope that syncterm be support it.

    SyncTERM has supported IPv6 for a few years now.

    bbs.docksud.com.ar from the world . I now research how to formward the 23 ipv6 to the ipv4 port until synchronet support ipv6 natively

    Expect IPv6 native support very soon after the next official release.

    ---
    http://DuckDuckGo.com/ a better search engine that respects your privacy.
    þ Synchronet þ My Brand-New BBS (All the cool
  • From Ragnarok@ragnarok@docksud.com.ar to Deuce on Sun Apr 5 06:54:18 2015
    El 05/04/15 a las 05:23, Deuce escibió:
    Re: Re: ipv6
    By: Ragnarok to Deuce on Sun Apr 05 2015 01:30 am

    i hope that syncterm be support it.

    SyncTERM has supported IPv6 for a few years now.

    good to kwown, i never had tried!

    bbs.docksud.com.ar from the world . I now research how to formward the 23 ipv6 to the ipv4 port until synchronet support ipv6 natively

    Expect IPv6 native support very soon after the next official release.

    thanks!
  • From Underminer@VERT to Deuce on Sun Apr 5 05:47:49 2015
    Re: Re: ipv6
    By: Deuce to Underminer on Sun Apr 05 2015 01:22:48

    Re: Re: ipv6
    By: Underminer to Deuce on Sat Apr 04 2015 06:28 pm

    The problem is most of those incorectly set up servers are on the ISP
    end.

    I dunno, my IPv6 ISP is Hurricane Electric. It's not a problem with the protocol itself though.

    You're right. I don't think the protocol itself is problematic, and it will be needed in the future. My point was just that IPv4 isn't going anywhere anytime soon so long as there's major ISPs and the like who don't implement IPv6 properly.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ The Undermine - undermine.ddns.net
  • From mark firestone@VERT to UNDERMINER on Thu Apr 9 13:09:00 2015
    --- UNDERMINER wrote --

    Yeah, I'd put more stock in it if IPv6 actually worked properly with anyth that supposedly supported it. I've lost count of how many times I've had t disable it on clients' routers to stop random disconnects

    Yep. I've got it disabled on all the servers I manage where I work, to
    prevent weird domain communication failures and other strange issues.

    IPv6 is kind of dumb. Well, it was really smart, ten plus years ago, in solving a bunch of problems that have since been solved a different, less
    smart way, since. Because those problems have been kludged over, IPv6 will break things... and because it's not really interoperable with IPv4, it's virtually impossible to implement. It's like a country that drives on the
    left deciding it's going to drive on the right next Monday.

    But we need it. ):


    ---
    * TARDIS BBS - Home of QUARKware * telnet bbs.cortex-media.info 4223
  • From Nonya@VERT to mark firestone on Thu Apr 9 08:30:16 2015
    --- UNDERMINER wrote --

    Yeah, I'd put more stock in it if IPv6 actually worked properly with
    anyth that supposedly supported it. I've lost count of how many times
    I've had t disable it on clients' routers to stop random disconnects

    Yep. I've got it disabled on all the servers I manage where I work, to prevent weird domain communication failures and other strange issues.

    IPv6 is kind of dumb. Well, it was really smart, ten plus years ago, in solving a bunch of problems that have since been solved a different,
    less
    smart way, since. Because those problems have been kludged over, IPv6
    will
    break things... and because it's not really interoperable with IPv4,
    it's
    virtually impossible to implement. It's like a country that drives on
    the
    left deciding it's going to drive on the right next Monday.

    But we need it. ):


    ---
    * TARDIS BBS - Home of QUARKware * telnet bbs.cortex-media.info 4223


    The sad thing is, the DoD is still pushing to have their networks 100% IPV6 even though that's not really necessary.
    Nonya - Pimptastic BBS

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Nonya's Pimptastic BBS
  • From Underminer@VERT to Nonya on Thu Apr 9 11:36:34 2015
    Re: Re: ipv6
    By: Nonya to mark firestone on Thu Apr 09 2015 08:30:16

    The sad thing is, the DoD is still pushing to have their networks 100% IPV6 even though that's not really necessary.
    Nonya - Pimptastic BBS

    I can understand that though. That's a pretty big ship to try and turn around quickly, so to speak. I'm sure they want to be compliant before ipv4 goes the way of the dinosaurs.
    ---------------
    Kostie Muirhead
    AKA Underminer
    The Undermine - undermine.ddns.net
    Fido: 1:342/17


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ The Undermine - undermine.ddns.net
  • From Bill McGarrity@VERT to mark firestone on Thu Apr 9 10:49:00 2015
    On 04-09-15 13:09, mark firestone wrote to UNDERMINER <=-

    --- UNDERMINER wrote --

    Yeah, I'd put more stock in it if IPv6 actually worked properly with anyth that supposedly supported it. I've lost count of how many times I've had t disable it on clients' routers to stop random disconnects

    Yep. I've got it disabled on all the servers I manage where I work, to prevent weird domain communication failures and other strange issues.

    IPv6 is kind of dumb. Well, it was really smart, ten plus years ago,
    in solving a bunch of problems that have since been solved a different, less smart way, since. Because those problems have been kludged over, IPv6 will break things... and because it's not really interoperable
    with IPv4, it's virtually impossible to implement. It's like a country that drives on the left deciding it's going to drive on the right next Monday.

    But we need it. ):

    And that day is coming...


    --

    Bill

    Telnet: tequilamockingbirdonline.net
    Web: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net
    FTP: ftp.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:2121
    IRC: irc.tequilamockingbirdonline.net Ports: 6661-6670 SSL: +6697
    Radio: radio.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:8010/live


    ... Look Twice... Save a Life!! Motorcycles are Everywhere!!
    === MultiMail/Win32 v0.50
    --- SBBSecho 2.27-Win32
    * Origin: TequilaMockingbird Online - Toms River, NJ (1:266/404)
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ telnet://vert.synchro.net