1. Forum
  2. DOVE-Net
  3. Synchronet Discussion

  • bad QWK packets from VERT

    From Nelgin@VERT/EOTLBBS to DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion on Fri Dec 13 16:12:23 2019
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 3396 Oct 1 17:31 VERT.qw0.5d93d3b3.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 3155 Oct 2 14:56 VERT.qw0.5d9500e9.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4029 Oct 8 20:33 VERT.qw0.5d9d38ff.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4295 Oct 8 20:48 VERT.qw0.5d9d3c7d.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 6002 Oct 16 23:56 VERT.qw0.5da7f47f.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4252 Oct 20 22:25 VERT.qw0.5dad2545.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 7491 Oct 21 18:03 VERT.qw0.5dae392c.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 3457 Oct 22 13:48 VERT.qw0.5daf4eeb.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4135 Oct 22 15:33 VERT.qw0.5daf6790.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4286 Oct 24 16:18 VERT.qw0.5db2151b.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 2507 Oct 25 11:33 VERT.qw0.5db323c8.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4751 Nov 6 13:48 VERT.qw0.5dc32390.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 2567 Nov 10 08:46 VERT.qw0.5dc822ae.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 3415 Nov 10 09:01 VERT.qw0.5dc82632.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 0 Sep 26 15:30 VERT.qwk
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 2665 Aug 26 07:22 VERT.qwk.5d63cef2.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4822 Aug 26 13:52 VERT.qwk.5d642a67.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4234 Aug 28 19:42 VERT.qwk.5d671f86.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 3338 Sep 1 20:05 VERT.qwk.5d6c6ae1.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 2472 Sep 13 04:02 VERT.qwk.5d7b5b44.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 2524 Sep 16 11:34 VERT.qwk.5d7fb995.bad

    Do you want me to upload some so you can take a look at why they may be reporting as bad? I feel we might have had this conversation before but I'd rather not see .bad packets lying around.

    Thanks,
    Nigel

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com
  • From Digital Man@VERT to Nelgin on Fri Dec 13 17:40:19 2019
    Re: bad QWK packets from VERT
    By: Nelgin to DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion on Fri Dec 13 2019 04:12 pm

    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 3396 Oct 1 17:31 VERT.qw0.5d93d3b3.bad -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 3155 Oct 2 14:56 VERT.qw0.5d9500e9.bad -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4029 Oct 8 20:33 VERT.qw0.5d9d38ff.bad -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4295 Oct 8 20:48 VERT.qw0.5d9d3c7d.bad -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 6002 Oct 16 23:56 VERT.qw0.5da7f47f.bad -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4252 Oct 20 22:25 VERT.qw0.5dad2545.bad -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 7491 Oct 21 18:03 VERT.qw0.5dae392c.bad -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 3457 Oct 22 13:48 VERT.qw0.5daf4eeb.bad -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4135 Oct 22 15:33 VERT.qw0.5daf6790.bad -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4286 Oct 24 16:18 VERT.qw0.5db2151b.bad -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 2507 Oct 25 11:33 VERT.qw0.5db323c8.bad -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4751 Nov 6 13:48 VERT.qw0.5dc32390.bad -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 2567 Nov 10 08:46 VERT.qw0.5dc822ae.bad -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 3415 Nov 10 09:01 VERT.qw0.5dc82632.bad -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 0 Sep 26 15:30 VERT.qwk
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 2665 Aug 26 07:22 VERT.qwk.5d63cef2.bad -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4822 Aug 26 13:52 VERT.qwk.5d642a67.bad -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4234 Aug 28 19:42 VERT.qwk.5d671f86.bad -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 3338 Sep 1 20:05 VERT.qwk.5d6c6ae1.bad -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 2472 Sep 13 04:02 VERT.qwk.5d7b5b44.bad -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 2524 Sep 16 11:34 VERT.qwk.5d7fb995.bad

    Do you want me to upload some so you can take a look at why they may be reporting as bad? I feel we might have had this conversation before but I'd rather not see .bad packets lying around.

    Most likely vote errors which are no longer tracked as errors. You can likely just safely delete them. Also, only the 10 most-recent bad packets should be retained.

    digital man

    This Is Spinal Tap quote #6:
    David St. Hubbins: He was the patron saint of quality footwear.
    Norco, CA WX: 61.6øF, 74.0% humidity, 3 mph SE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Nelgin@VERT/EOTLBBS to Digital Man on Fri Dec 13 20:31:01 2019
    Digital wrote:
    Re: bad QWK packets from VERT
    By: Nelgin to DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion on Fri Dec 13 2019 04:12 pm

    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 3396 Oct 1 17:31 VERT.qw0.5d93d3b3.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 3155 Oct 2 14:56 VERT.qw0.5d9500e9.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4029 Oct 8 20:33 VERT.qw0.5d9d38ff.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4295 Oct 8 20:48 VERT.qw0.5d9d3c7d.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 6002 Oct 16 23:56 VERT.qw0.5da7f47f.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4252 Oct 20 22:25 VERT.qw0.5dad2545.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 7491 Oct 21 18:03 VERT.qw0.5dae392c.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 3457 Oct 22 13:48 VERT.qw0.5daf4eeb.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4135 Oct 22 15:33 VERT.qw0.5daf6790.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4286 Oct 24 16:18 VERT.qw0.5db2151b.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 2507 Oct 25 11:33 VERT.qw0.5db323c8.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4751 Nov 6 13:48 VERT.qw0.5dc32390.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 2567 Nov 10 08:46 VERT.qw0.5dc822ae.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 3415 Nov 10 09:01 VERT.qw0.5dc82632.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 0 Sep 26 15:30 VERT.qwk
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 2665 Aug 26 07:22 VERT.qwk.5d63cef2.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4822 Aug 26 13:52 VERT.qwk.5d642a67.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4234 Aug 28 19:42 VERT.qwk.5d671f86.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 3338 Sep 1 20:05 VERT.qwk.5d6c6ae1.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 2472 Sep 13 04:02 VERT.qwk.5d7b5b44.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 2524 Sep 16 11:34 VERT.qwk.5d7fb995.bad

    Do you want me to upload some so you can take a look at why they may be
    reporting as bad? I feel we might have had this conversation before but I'd
    rather not see .bad packets lying around.

    Most likely vote errors which are no longer tracked as errors. You can likely just safely delete them. Also, only the 10 most-recent bad packets should be retained.

    Ah, I seem to remember you mentioning something about those being votes. Any way to check for sure?

    Also...something isn't right if only the 10 most recent bad packets should
    be listed. Is that part of a timed event that I may not be running or is it built-in ?

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com
  • From Digital Man@VERT to Nelgin on Sat Dec 14 00:45:22 2019
    Re: Re: bad QWK packets from VERT
    By: Nelgin to Digital Man on Fri Dec 13 2019 08:31 pm

    Digital wrote:
    Re: bad QWK packets from VERT
    By: Nelgin to DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion on Fri Dec 13 2019 04:12 pm

    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 3396 Oct 1 17:31 VERT.qw0.5d93d3b3.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 3155 Oct 2 14:56 VERT.qw0.5d9500e9.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4029 Oct 8 20:33 VERT.qw0.5d9d38ff.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4295 Oct 8 20:48 VERT.qw0.5d9d3c7d.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 6002 Oct 16 23:56 VERT.qw0.5da7f47f.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4252 Oct 20 22:25 VERT.qw0.5dad2545.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 7491 Oct 21 18:03 VERT.qw0.5dae392c.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 3457 Oct 22 13:48 VERT.qw0.5daf4eeb.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4135 Oct 22 15:33 VERT.qw0.5daf6790.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4286 Oct 24 16:18 VERT.qw0.5db2151b.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 2507 Oct 25 11:33 VERT.qw0.5db323c8.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4751 Nov 6 13:48 VERT.qw0.5dc32390.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 2567 Nov 10 08:46 VERT.qw0.5dc822ae.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 3415 Nov 10 09:01 VERT.qw0.5dc82632.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 0 Sep 26 15:30 VERT.qwk
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 2665 Aug 26 07:22 VERT.qwk.5d63cef2.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4822 Aug 26 13:52 VERT.qwk.5d642a67.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 4234 Aug 28 19:42 VERT.qwk.5d671f86.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 3338 Sep 1 20:05 VERT.qwk.5d6c6ae1.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 2472 Sep 13 04:02 VERT.qwk.5d7b5b44.bad
    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 2524 Sep 16 11:34 VERT.qwk.5d7fb995.bad

    Do you want me to upload some so you can take a look at why they may be
    reporting as bad? I feel we might have had this conversation before but I'd
    rather not see .bad packets lying around.

    Most likely vote errors which are no longer tracked as errors. You can likely just safely delete them. Also, only the 10 most-recent bad packets should be retained.

    Ah, I seem to remember you mentioning something about those being votes. Any way to check for sure?

    The logs should say.

    Also...something isn't right if only the 10 most recent bad packets should be listed. Is that part of a timed event that I may not be running or is it built-in ?

    It's built-in, but that change may have been made after your last bad packet was received/saved. Just delete or move those files and see what happens. That'd be my recommendation.

    digital man

    Synchronet "Real Fact" #102:
    Synchronet added PETSCII (e.g. C64/C128) terminal support in October of 2018. Norco, CA WX: 53.3øF, 97.0% humidity, 0 mph S wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Rampage@VERT/SESTAR to Nelgin on Sat Dec 14 07:21:11 2019
    Re: bad QWK packets from VERT
    By: Nelgin to DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion on Fri Dec 13 2019 16:12:23


    Do you want me to upload some so you can take a look at why they may
    be reporting as bad? I feel we might have had this conversation
    before but I'd rather not see .bad packets lying around.

    i'm curious why you have more than 10 of them... IIRC, DM adjusted the code to keep only the last 10 (for inspection if needed/desired) and remove the older ones...


    )\/(ark

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ The SouthEast Star Mail HUB - SESTAR
  • From Ragnarok@docksud.com.ar to Nelgin on Thu Dec 19 11:43:56 2019
    El 13/12/19 a las 23:31, Nelgin escribió:
    Digital wrote:
    Re: bad QWK packets from VERT
    By: Nelgin to DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion on Fri Dec 13 2019 04:12 pm

    -rw------- 1 bbs bbs 3396 Oct 1 17:31 VERT.qw0.5d93d3b3.bad

    I had the same problem and deactivate the votes.
  • From MRO@VERT/BBSESINF to Nelgin on Sat Dec 14 13:37:33 2019
    Re: Re: bad QWK packets from VERT
    By: Nelgin to Digital Man on Fri Dec 13 2019 08:31 pm

    Also...something isn't right if only the 10 most recent bad packets should be listed. Is that part of a timed event that I may not be running or is it built-in ?


    just dont worry about it. these things happen sometimes.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::